The Epstein case keeps getting darker as a bunch of never-before-seen photos and videos give an insight into Little St James Island, the private island of the now-deceased billionaire and sexual predator. Among the new photos and videos released by the House Oversight Committee, a strange dentist’s office with odd masks and a blackboard has caught the attention of netizens.
The dentist’s office gives an eerie vibe because of its setting, and several words on the blackboard appear redacted, leading to netizens coming up with new theories regarding which words have authorities redacted and why. The redacted words are surrounded by other visible words, including ‘mirror in face’, ‘power’, ‘intellectual’, ‘deception’, ‘political’, ‘truth’ etc.
Some of these words make sense when they are considered in terms of the kind of life Epstein lived. It is quite well known that he enjoyed spending time with intellectuals, as there is proof of his correspondence with the famous linguist Noam Chomsky. His hunger for power can also be deciphered based on his actions. However, not every visible word on the blackboard has a direct and straightforward connection with him and that is what has piqued the interest of netizens.
‼️ABD Temsilciler Meclisi Denetim Komitesindeki Demokratlar, Pedofili sapık Jeffrey Epstein’in kâbus adasının daha önce hiç görülmemiş fotoğraf ve videolarını yayımladı.
▪️Görüntülerde birkaç yatak odası, banyo ve bir odada dişçi koltuğunu andıran bir düzenek dikkat çekiyor.… pic.twitter.com/lMCPFe0Emw
— NE KADAR OLDU? (@NekadarolduTR) December 4, 2025
The redaction of certain words also remains a mystery. Some theories suggest that ‘dank brain’ is a word that was redacted. As Unilaid reported, “Approximations of what was written on the whiteboard claim that some of the words include ‘truth/myth reality’ under the header ‘plants’ with a line drawn to the word power.”
A number of other words cannot be read because of Epstein’s messy handwriting. Netizens have used this opportunity to turn into detectives and uncover why some words were redacted while others were not. One user focused on the removal of ‘dank brain’ from the official release of these pictures and mentioned, “So later, when they ‘Un-Redact’ some photos they can say ‘Fine… here’s a few untouched’.”
Another added, “Basically….. it’s fodder to throw people off. Redact everything to make it difficult to find anything.” A third person had a critical theory as they said, “They likely are redacting a lot of things that don’t need redaction, that way folks can’t identify which redactions would be meaningful to identify.”
Ever since Donald Trump signed a bill on November 19, asking for the release of all data on the Epstein files, the possibility of redacting certain information has been a constant source of discussion.
View this post on Instagram
Critics have pointed out that since Trump’s own name has come up multiple times while talking about the people in the Epstein files, it is highly unlikely that his administration would release the files without redacting information that would show the president in a poor light.
Members of both the Republican and Democratic parties have come together to demand the release of all the files, and Pam Bondi has been sent a letter asking her to release the new information on the Epstein case that she had previously mentioned.
With the release of redacted images, skepticism around the release of all the information in those files has increased. It would be interesting to see if the Department of Justice would indeed release those files unredacted or censor information they think would damage the reputation and position of certain powerful people.
