Florida Teen Goes To School Without Bra, Forced To Put Bandages Over Nipples To Stop ‘Distracting’ Boys

A Florida teen is making national headlines after she says she was humiliated by her school’s administration for failing to wear a bra to school. According to 17-year-old Lizzy Martinez, she was wearing a modest, loose, gray, long-sleeved shirt when she went to class at Braden River High School on Monday. To her shock and amazement, she found herself sent to the office of Dean Violeta Velazquez after a teacher complained that her attire was a “distraction.”

Specifically, the teacher had reported to the dean that Lizzy’s unbound breasts and visible nipples were “a distraction to boys in [her] class.” In a conversation with a local newspaper, the high school student claims that she was told to disguise the appearance of her braless breasts by constricting them with a second shirt under her long-sleeve shirt. After she made the modifications to her attire, Lizzy Martinez claims that her dean demanded that she “move around” to prove that her breasts were sufficiently restrained, reports KIRO 7.

“She told me that I needed to put a shirt on under my long-sleeve shirt to try to tighten my breasts — to constrict them. And then she asked me to move around.”

The Braden River High School Dean remained dissatisfied with the 17-year-old girl’s appearance, and according to Martinez told her to go to the nurse’s clinic to get four bandages – two for each breast – to cover her nipples. Martinez claims that the humiliating body-shaming left her in tears, and she later took to social media to express her disgust and outrage.

In a tweet, Lizzy Martinez accused her teacher and school administration of putting her male classmates’ educational opportunities above her own, even treating her as though “boys’ education is far more important.” What’s more, the teen felt as though she was being taught to be “ashamed of my body.” The school district involved in the incident admits that the situation played out as described by Martinez, but claims that they were just “trying to enforce the dress code.”

A dress code that, incidentally, doesn’t require girls to wear bras, or even mention female undergarments.

It does, however, prohibit students from “dressing in a manner that distracts other students.” In a statement released by Mitchell Teitelbaum, the general counsel for the school district, he admitted that matter “should have been handled differently.”

“This matter was brought to the attention of the Superintendent’s Office for review. It is undisputed that this matter should have been handled differently at the school level and corrective measures have been taken to prevent a reoccurrence in the way these matters will be addressed in the future.”

According to Teitelbaum, school employees were simply trying to help the student correct her violation of the dress code. As WCPO 9 reports, the school made a point of making it known that Lizzy Martinez was not subjected to disciplinary action in connection with her alleged dress code violation. However, Martinez’ mother Kari Knop was unhappy with the way her daughter was treated and singled out simply for being a girl with breasts and demanded a meeting with school administrators after she learned of her daughters’ ordeal.

“We should not treat a girl like this because of where her fat cells decided to distribute genetically.”

Martinez also shared a screenshot that indicates that she has been blocked from commenting on her school’s Twitter account following the incident and tweeting out a demand that Braden River High School “stop sexualizing my body.”

Martinez says that she now intends to stop wearing a bra to school in protest of the school’s alleged sexualization of her body. She further added that the distraction was being caused by other students’ behavior, not her choice to go without a bra. She believes that it was the “distracted” boys who should have been pulled out of class and counseled for their reactions, not her.

“The students that were laughing or snickering or talking about me — that should have been addressed, not me, because I wasn’t the issue there.”