Taylor Swift Slammed By Pandora Exec, Freelance Photographer For Apple Letter

Chanel Adams

Taylor Swift has been applauded lately for her "victorious" open letter to Apple, explaining why she wouldn't include her new album 1989 on their new streaming service, Apple Music. In her letter, Swift explained that Apple Music is giving its customers a three-month trial, which means that artists won't get paid during those three months. Apple responded in a series of tweets, saying that they decided to pay their artists during the three-month trial. Now, a Pandora exec and a freelance photographer are slamming Taylor Swift for her letter.

Pandora is speaking out about Taylor Swift's open letter, and it's not pretty. Chief Technology Officer Tom Conrad also took to Twitter to address his feelings about Swift's letter. In a series of Tweets, Conrad argued that streaming services like Pandora, Spotify, and YouTube pay all artists every time a user streams their music through free trials or paid subscriptions. He also goes on to say that Swift's letter and Apple's "swift" move is all part of their PR. He also says that both fans and the media shouldn't see Swift's letter as some sort of heroic move or as progress within the music industry.

"1/ Spotify, YouTube Pandora and others all pay artists for their free tiers and trials. It's the right thing to do.

2/ Swift took her new album off Spotify not because she's not paid, but because she feels their free service "devalues music."

3/ Swift never pulled from YouTube which is the most popular free service and certainly devalues music if Spotify does.

4/ Swift's career was [built] on terrestrial radio play, which is a free service AND doesn't pay recording artists a dime.

5/ Apple isn't getting rid of its long free trial, but is now going to pay artists. This simply puts it at parity with all other players.

6/ Reminder: Apple uses music to make billion[s] off hardware. Artists see nothing from this.

7/ Swift's letter and Apple's response is mostly theater. Nothing here to suggest that Apple treats artists more fairly than anyone else.

8/ My point is this: there is too much animus between artists & Silicon Valley. We shouldn't herald this move as progress. It's status quo."

2/ Swift took her new album off Spotify not because she's not paid, but because she feels their free service "devalues music."

3/ Swift never pulled from YouTube which is the most popular free service and certainly devalues music if Spotify does.

4/ Swift's career was [built] on terrestrial radio play, which is a free service AND doesn't pay recording artists a dime.

5/ Apple isn't getting rid of its long free trial, but is now going to pay artists. This simply puts it at parity with all other players.

6/ Reminder: Apple uses music to make billion[s] off hardware. Artists see nothing from this.

7/ Swift's letter and Apple's response is mostly theater. Nothing here to suggest that Apple treats artists more fairly than anyone else.

8/ My point is this: there is too much animus between artists & Silicon Valley. We shouldn't herald this move as progress. It's status quo."

A freelance photographer isn't sitting well with Swift's letter either. Jason Sheldon is calling Swift a hypocrite in his very open letter on his blog. He explains that Swift's controls the use of her photos, which means that photographers like Sheldon won't get paid for their work. Sheldon goes as far as to say that Swift has acted the same that Apple has in the past for not paying their artists.

"You say in your letter that three months is a long time to go unpaid. But you seem happy to restrict us to being paid once, and never being able to earn from our work ever again, while granting you the rights to exploit our work for your benefit for all eternity. How are you any different to Apple?

"Photographers need to earn a living as well. Like Apple, you can afford to pay for photographs so please stop forcing us to hand them over to you while you prevent us from publishing them more than once, ever."

"Photographers need to earn a living as well. Like Apple, you can afford to pay for photographs so please stop forcing us to hand them over to you while you prevent us from publishing them more than once, ever."

What are your thoughts on Taylor Swift's open letter to Apple? Do you think she should be applauded as well as criticized? Share your thoughts below in the comments section.

[Image: Sascha Steinbach/Getty Images for TAS]

ALL CONTENT © 2008 - 2021 THE INQUISITR.