Posted in: Celebrity News

Ja Rule In Jail Until July, Has To Pay Back $1.1 Million In Back Taxes

Ja Rule In Jail Until July, Has To Pay Back $1.1 Million In Back Taxes

Ja Rule will remain in jail until July to serve time for tax evasion, prison officials in New York said this week.

The platinum-selling artist is in a New York City jail, and the Federal Bureau of Prisons announced that he will remain there until mid 2013. Ja Rule was released last week from a prison in central New York, where he served most of his two-year sentence for illegal gun possession, and moved to a federal prison, The Associated Press noted.

Ja Rule is now in jail in Brooklyn’s Metropolitan Detention Center, a facility that houses prisoners with little time left on their sentences or those awaiting trial.

The July release date is a bit of a change from the rapper’s previous hopes. Back in November, the buzz online said that he would be getting free in February. SOHH noted at the time:

“Ja Rule checked in to his current prison term in June of last year, and in just a few more months, he’ll be able to wave goodbye to his cell…hopefully for good! His site has announced that the New York rapper will be released from jail in February of next year, which gives him just 3 months until freedom!”

That three months turned out to be seven, as Ja Rule will remain in jail longer than initially expected to finish his federal charges.

Ja Rule was put in jail after he admitting that he failed to pay taxes on more than $3 million he earned between 2004 and 2006 when he lived in New Jersey. He said he is anxious to get back to work once he’s free, and for good reason — he’s being ordered to pay back the $1.1 million he owes.

Articles And Offers From The Web

Comments

4 Responses to “Ja Rule In Jail Until July, Has To Pay Back $1.1 Million In Back Taxes”

  1. Jake Witmer

    A MESSAGE OF COMPASSION AND UNITY, FOR MY FELLOW CITIZENS, FREE TO COPY, PRINT, AND REPOST:

    Even wealth and popularity can't protect the black man, or the political critic, from the illegitimate government we have today. Look at the USA! We're doing everything that Hitler did, right up until "the final solution." Except, in this country, it won't be the Jews who get murdered, it will be blacks, mexicans, and anyone who speaks out against the government.

    Tax evasion is not a "crime."

    Tax evasion is a "malum prohibitum." Mala prohibita (Latin plural of "malum prohibitum") is any crime that is created solely by the act of prohibition. Mala prohibita are also called "victimless crimes" or "crimes created solely by the act of legislation." Mala prohibita are different from "mala in se," which are crimes that everyone recognizes as crimes, crimes that possess both "injury" and "intent to injure" a specific, named party. If a crime possesses both "injury" and "intent to injure" a specific person, then it is said to have a "body of the crime" or "corpus delecti."

    Lawyers use these fancy foreign words to confuse their intended victims, the general public. The purpose of the courts is no longer to uphold the supreme law (the constitution), or the people's understanding of the constitution ("the common law"). The purpose of the courts is to steal from voting demographics that are less than 50%. If you're black, hispanic, or you think for yourself: THIS MEANS YOU. Go to any modern court. The majority of what they're doing is trying to steal money from motorists and the users of drugs that have a better cost/benefit than alcohol and cigarettes, as quickly as possible. Because the jury system has been destroyed by your ignorance, they get away with it, too!

    Well, you say, how can I become a better citizen, and less of a servile tax-slave? (The great abolitionist and former slave, Frederick Douglass, stated that if you couldn't control one dollar of your own income, you were a slave, you simply might be a better-treated slave than your peers. The strength of his mind freed him from slavery, and he became not only a great abolitionist, but a classical liberal, now called "libertarian," intellectual, in his own right.) You can do several things. First of all, you can visit the Fully Informed Jury Association online, and read about how juries were gradually destroyed. The gist of the message is: Although juries still have the right to veto laws they disagree with (by returning "Not Guilty" verdicts in cases where the accused clearly broke the law), judges and prosecutors team up to mislead them into believing this is not true. In 1850, the sociopathic judges and prosecutors (they can be identified as sociopaths because they sought positions of unconstitutional power over their fellow man, and then failed to restrain that power once elected) of the Northern courts were not as anti-slavery as the Northern citizens were. They favored the enforcement of the horrible "Fugitive Slave Law of 1850." As such, they created a new courtroom procedure that allowed the prosecutors to question the jury and dismiss anyone who disagreed with returning Fugitive Slaves to the South, to face execution or continued slavery and public beatings. This practice continues today, as a means of enforcing unpopular laws. Once again, the lawyers have used foreign language to hide their intentions from the uneducated layman. They call this questioning and selection process "voir dire." Voir dire is a French term that means to see the truth. It means, essentially, that the court is seeing the truth about how smart the "prospective juror" or "venireman" is who stands before them. If he's smart enough to think for himself, they say "dismissed" and send him home. If he's a moron who will obey his government, and punish his fellow slave, they allow him to sit on the jury.

    In 162 years, very little has changed. America's legal system is still the most racist, backwards system in the world. (There are over 2.4 million people in prison, and over 60% of them are imprisoned for "victimless crime" offenses! The USA has only 5% of the World's population, but over 25% of the world's prisoners! Some "Land of the Free!") Judges (who are usually ex-prosecutors, and almost always bar-licensed lawyers) and prosecutors still use "voir dire" to send people to prison for actions that are non-criminal. And this is shameful, because the Declaration of Independence and the Bill of Rights are two of the most pro-freedom government charters ever to exist. But if so, why didn't they prevent slavery, or the current perversion of the common law system? Simple: the Founders were not all equally anti-slavery, and they were under a tight time schedule to avoid getting their asses kicked by the British, who had the world's strongest navy, and plenty of backup soldiers. Their only choice was to push an inadequate constitution through the committee. The primary failing of the Constitution is that it did not clearly and precisely define what constitutes a proper jury.

    After visiting the Fully Informed Jury Association, and the International Society for Individual Liberty online, and reading about your rights as a jury member, what then? Well, you can get organized and hand out pamphlets in front of your local courthouse, or door-to-door in your neighborhood. (If you're brave, and have extra time or money to risk. In Alaska, one such pamphleteer was arrested and charged with "jury tampering" for telling the jury about the rights they possess. This essentially resulted in his year long imprisonment for political speech. His name is Frank Turney, and his pamphlets prevented the punishment of an innocent man who was being denied his gun rights.) If you don't want to hand out pamphlets to strangers, at least hand them out to your family and friends, or print this comment and give it to them. Sure, you will meet people who favor the system of tyranny, and present arguments to the contrary. If you want to totally defeat those arguments, you can buy the book "Let's Get Free: A Hip-Hop Theory of Justice" by Professor Paul Butler, or "Jury Nullification: The Evolution of a Doctrine," by Clay Conrad. You can find these books linked on Jake Witmer's Blog, which comes back after a simple google search.

    The arguments against "Jury Veto" (also called "Jury Nullification of Law" or just, "Jury Nullification") are the arguments of tyrants and their jargon-spewing sophist defenders. When abolitionist Lysander Spooner was criticizing the legitimacy of the government, he wrote that there were generally three types of Americans: dupes (people too dumb to know the government was screwing them), knaves (people who benefitted from the taxation, and didn't mind stealing from their neighbors), and cowards (people who knew that involuntary taxation was outlawed by the Constitution's original Article 1, Section 9, but who failed to fight the government, due to fear).

    So next time you're called for jury duty, dummy up! Answer the prosecutor's "voir dire" questions like an obedient idiot who is willing to do whatever the judge tells him to do, including "apply the law as it is given to you." Don't look excited to be there, imitate the other prospective jury members. Pretend you don't know that you have the legal right, and the power, to ignore the judge's unconstitutional "instructions." (Before a bad Supreme Court precedent in 1895, the jurors who made it past "voir dire" were informed that they had a right to vote their consciences, even if their conscience was "in direct disagreement with the law." That supreme court precedent was "Sparf and Hansen v. USA")

    Then, vote "Not Guilty," and see justice done!

    FEEL FREE TO COPY AND REPOST.

  2. Jake Witmer

    A MESSAGE OF COMPASSION AND UNITY, FOR MY FELLOW CITIZENS, FREE TO COPY, PRINT, AND REPOST:

    Even wealth and popularity can't protect the black man, or the political critic, from the illegitimate government we have today. Look at the USA! We're doing everything that Hitler did, right up until "the final solution." Except, in this country, it won't be the Jews who get murdered, it will be blacks, mexicans, and anyone who speaks out against the government.

    Tax evasion is not a "crime."

    Tax evasion is a "malum prohibitum." Mala prohibita (Latin plural of "malum prohibitum") is any crime that is created solely by the act of prohibition. Mala prohibita are also called "victimless crimes" or "crimes created solely by the act of legislation." Mala prohibita are different from "mala in se," which are crimes that everyone recognizes as crimes, crimes that possess both "injury" and "intent to injure" a specific, named party. If a crime possesses both "injury" and "intent to injure" a specific person, then it is said to have a "body of the crime" or "corpus delecti."

    Lawyers use these fancy foreign words to confuse their intended victims, the general public. The purpose of the courts is no longer to uphold the supreme law (the constitution), or the people's understanding of the constitution ("the common law"). The purpose of the courts is to steal from voting demographics that are less than 50%. If you're black, hispanic, or you think for yourself: THIS MEANS YOU. Go to any modern court. The majority of what they're doing is trying to steal money from motorists and the users of drugs that have a better cost/benefit than alcohol and cigarettes, as quickly as possible. Because the jury system has been destroyed by your ignorance, they get away with it, too!

    Well, you say, how can I become a better citizen, and less of a servile tax-slave? (The great abolitionist and former slave, Frederick Douglass, stated that if you couldn't control one dollar of your own income, you were a slave, you simply might be a better-treated slave than your peers. The strength of his mind freed him from slavery, and he became not only a great abolitionist, but a classical liberal, now called "libertarian," intellectual, in his own right.) You can do several things. First of all, you can visit the Fully Informed Jury Association online, and read about how juries were gradually destroyed. The gist of the message is: Although juries still have the right to veto laws they disagree with (by returning "Not Guilty" verdicts in cases where the accused clearly broke the law), judges and prosecutors team up to mislead them into believing this is not true. In 1850, the sociopathic judges and prosecutors (they can be identified as sociopaths because they sought positions of unconstitutional power over their fellow man, and then failed to restrain that power once elected) of the Northern courts were not as anti-slavery as the Northern citizens were. They favored the enforcement of the horrible "Fugitive Slave Law of 1850." As such, they created a new courtroom procedure that allowed the prosecutors to question the jury and dismiss anyone who disagreed with returning Fugitive Slaves to the South, to face execution or continued slavery and public beatings. This practice continues today, as a means of enforcing unpopular laws. Once again, the lawyers have used foreign language to hide their intentions from the uneducated layman. They call this questioning and selection process "voir dire." Voir dire is a French term that means to see the truth. It means, essentially, that the court is seeing the truth about how smart the "prospective juror" or "venireman" is who stands before them. If he's smart enough to think for himself, they say "dismissed" and send him home. If he's a moron who will obey his government, and punish his fellow slave, they allow him to sit on the jury.

    In 162 years, very little has changed. America's legal system is still the most racist, backwards system in the world. (There are over 2.4 million people in prison, and over 60% of them are imprisoned for "victimless crime" offenses! The USA has only 5% of the World's population, but over 25% of the world's prisoners! Some "Land of the Free!") Judges (who are usually ex-prosecutors, and almost always bar-licensed lawyers) and prosecutors still use "voir dire" to send people to prison for actions that are non-criminal. And this is shameful, because the Declaration of Independence and the Bill of Rights are two of the most pro-freedom government charters ever to exist. But if so, why didn't they prevent slavery, or the current perversion of the common law system? Simple: the Founders were not all equally anti-slavery, and they were under a tight time schedule to avoid getting their asses kicked by the British, who had the world's strongest navy, and plenty of backup soldiers. Their only choice was to push an inadequate constitution through the committee. The primary failing of the Constitution is that it did not clearly and precisely define what constitutes a proper jury.

    After visiting the Fully Informed Jury Association, and the International Society for Individual Liberty online, and reading about your rights as a jury member, what then? Well, you can get organized and hand out pamphlets in front of your local courthouse, or door-to-door in your neighborhood. (If you're brave, and have extra time or money to risk. In Alaska, one such pamphleteer was arrested and charged with "jury tampering" for telling the jury about the rights they possess. This essentially resulted in his year long imprisonment for political speech. His name is Frank Turney, and his pamphlets prevented the punishment of an innocent man who was being denied his gun rights.) If you don't want to hand out pamphlets to strangers, at least hand them out to your family and friends, or print this comment and give it to them. Sure, you will meet people who favor the system of tyranny, and present arguments to the contrary. If you want to totally defeat those arguments, you can buy the book "Let's Get Free: A Hip-Hop Theory of Justice" by Professor Paul Butler, or "Jury Nullification: The Evolution of a Doctrine," by Clay Conrad. You can find these books linked on Jake Witmer's Blog, which comes back after a simple google search.

    The arguments against "Jury Veto" (also called "Jury Nullification of Law" or just, "Jury Nullification") are the arguments of tyrants and their jargon-spewing sophist defenders. When abolitionist Lysander Spooner was criticizing the legitimacy of the government, he wrote that there were generally three types of Americans: dupes (people too dumb to know the government was screwing them), knaves (people who benefitted from the taxation, and didn't mind stealing from their neighbors), and cowards (people who knew that involuntary taxation was outlawed by the Constitution's original Article 1, Section 9, but who failed to fight the government, due to fear).

    So next time you're called for jury duty, dummy up! Answer the prosecutor's "voir dire" questions like an obedient idiot who is willing to do whatever the judge tells him to do, including "apply the law as it is given to you." Don't look excited to be there, imitate the other prospective jury members. Pretend you don't know that you have the legal right, and the power, to ignore the judge's unconstitutional "instructions." (Before a bad Supreme Court precedent in 1895, the jurors who made it past "voir dire" were informed that they had a right to vote their consciences, even if their conscience was "in direct disagreement with the law." That supreme court precedent was "Sparf and Hansen v. USA")

    Then, vote "Not Guilty," and see justice done! Stand up for your individual freedom and constitutionally-protected rights. Noone else will do it for you.

    FEEL FREE TO COPY AND REPOST.

  3. Jake Witmer

    How can there be such a thing as "illegal gun possession" in a country with the Second Amendment? Oh yeah, that's right, he's black, so his Second Amendment rights don't apply. In Alaska, Vermont, Wyoming, or Arizona, "illegal gun possession" wouldn't be considered a crime. So how can it send someone to prison in other States? Doesn't the 14th Amendment extent the Bill of Rights to all citizens? Or are there still such a thing as slaves in America?

    Obviously, the liberal establishment is the most racist group of people who exist. The very first "Jim Crow" law passed in the South after the Civil War was the law requiring people to get permission of their local sheriffs in order to carry a concealed weapon for defense. Blacks were denied permits, whites were not. The result: over 4,500 innocent blacks lynched in the South.

    And now, some traitorous blacks want to deny all blacks their hard-won right to self-defense. The result of which will be to place more young black men in jail, simply for exercising their right to carry a weapon adequate to defend themselves from aggression. And what fuels the aggression? Mostly jealousy, and the black market drug trade, which exists because drugs are banned. Before 1910, anyone could buy heroin or cocaine in a pharmacy, and it was no big deal. There was no crime associated with it, and addicts were basically as dangerous as drunks are now.

    But get rid of property rights, and the government will find a group to scapegoat. Blacks don't use drugs or own weapons more than whites do, but in the areas where blacks live, those things are banned, and the police arrest thousands of people for these "victimless crimes." Then, they make everyone in the USA pay for their prison industrial complex, at gunpoint, resulting in a country no more free than France or Spain. America is not the land of the free. We are the world's number one jailor, and a racist jailor, at that.

    Ja Rule's persecution is grotesque. He should demand a jury trial, and the jurors should all vote "Not Guilty." He's done nothing wrong. Americans need to wake up to the prison planet they are paying for, with their childrens' future. It's not worth the price.

    Every one of the gun-banning politicians and constitutional-oath-breaking cops in NY, Chicago, DC, and other faux-liberal (socialist) controlled cities, needs to be publicly confronted by angry voters. Of course, the voters are acting like sheep now, and that's why they need to vote Libertarian, and conduct public exit polls to make sure the votes aren't rigged. For all we really know, Libertarians have been winning elections for years, and everyone is just too ashamed and simple minded to admit that they voted against the system.

    This is what you get, when the government educates your kids. A nation of the simple-minded and easily controlled.