The WikiLeaks Podesta emails have revealed some incredibly damning information regarding the Hillary Clinton campaign, but all the mainstream press seem to want to talk about is Donald Trump’s comments about women.
“He called her fat.”
“He said he’d have sex with her when she got older.”
“He said she’d be good in bed.”
"She's probably deeply troubled and therefore great in bed." — Donald Trump on Lindsey Lohan in 2004 https://t.co/4IMheWqYCn
— Jennifer Bendery (@jbendery) October 14, 2016
It’s funny to me that we’re supposed to take something he said on Howard Stern’s show seriously. If you’re under the age of 30, please do a bit of research about Howard and watch his interviews with people besides Donald Trump. If you’re not already too brainwashed by the media, you’ll learn that this kind of talk is the norm for Stern’s shows.
Then there’s the completely out of the blue group of women who’ve come forward to tell the world that Trump sexually abused them, never mind the fact that it’s awfully convenient for these ladies to come out of the woodwork at this time in the election season. Why did they all come forward now? It seems pretty coincidental if you ask me.
For those of you who want to tell me, “It’s that kind of attitude that prevents women from coming forward after they’ve been raped,” please spare me. I’ve had the same kind of experiences these women are claiming to have and worse, and I never reported them. You can bet that if I did decide to come forward about these experiences, I wouldn’t allow it to be publicized to the world, and I don’t care how much money I was offered. I’d be mortified if everyone and their dog knew about this dark and incredibly personal part of my past.
#Trump vs. The World
— Std Redneck Halley???? (@HalleyBorderCol) October 15, 2016
According to a recent poll, only 6 percent of Americans trust the mainstream media, so I’m willing to bet it’s only that small percentage who believe these damaging stories coming out against Donald Trump, or so I hope.
According to Google Trends, the mainstream media and the people are not in sync regarding interests. The media is reporting Donald Trump sex allegations with story upon story upon story, while the people are searching for the WikiLeaks Podesta emails.
Why aren’t the media elite giving the people what they want? Probably because Hillary Clinton has them in her back pocket. They serve her, not the “everyday Americans” she hates.
Net Advisor wrote an article entitled “Unethical Media Colluding With Hillary Clinton’s 2016 Campaign” on October 12, summarizing the leaks which have brought the Clinton, media collusion from a “right-wing conspiracy” into cold, hard reality.
Let’s begin with CNN, an organization which has appropriately been dubbed the “Clinton News Network” by Republicans and Trump supporters.
Donna Brazile, CNN political commentator, penned an email in which it looks as if she’s giving the Democratic nominee a heads-up on a question that she was going to be asked the following night during a town hall event. At the time this email was exchanged, Brazile was acting as vice chairwoman of the DNC and she was on the CNN payroll.
Brazile, along with a CNN representative, deny that the content of the email implies what it seems to imply, but it’s hard to be convincing in the face of proof.
“The email obtained by POLITICO was written by town hall co-moderator Roland Martin on the day of the town hall to CNN producers. But it shows him using word for word the language of a question that Brazile appeared to have sent to the Clinton campaign a day earlier.”
The New York Times have done pretty much everything they can to take the wind out of Donald Trump’s sails, so it comes as no surprise that the WikiLeaks Podesta emails have yielded proof of collusion between the prestigious publication and the Clinton campaign.
Mark Leibovich of the New York Times appears to have asked the Clinton camp what kinds of stories they should publish, as well as what kinds of stories should be avoided. Leibovich also gives them the option to “veto” out parts they deem unacceptable as well as giving them a handful of possible story ideas to choose from.
He writes, “I wanted the option to use all — and you could veto what you didn’t want. That’s why i selected the 5 or 6 I sent to you…”
NBC News is reportedly sitting on a 1999 interview they had with Bill Clinton rape accuser Juanita Broaddrick, of whom I’ve written extensively about.
Daily Caller reports that Michael Isikoffa, a journalist who used to work for NBC, is trying to persuade the news organization to release the interview.
Isikoffa says that Broaddrick appeared on Dateline and admitted to anchor Lisa Myers that Mrs. Clinton tried to scare Juanita into silence after President Clinton raped her in 1978.
“‘Broaddrick told her story to NBC and the WashPost in 99. Both organizations closely vetted her story and chose to run it,’ wrote Isikoff.”
Clinton supporters, if they chose to believe Broaddrick in the first place, which in my opinion is not likely with their level of denial, probably wouldn’t appreciate the fact that the woman who says every victim of rape should be believed actually took measures to silence the rape victim of her own husband.
The backlash could prove catastrophic for Hillary Clinton, so why do you think NBC is keeping the interview from the general public?
There are a couple possibilities as to why. One, perhaps they fear the Democratic candidate. Or two, she may be paying to keep them quiet. Whatever the reason, it’s highly doubtful that if NBC had information about Trump that was equally damaging in nature, they wouldn’t be hiding it.
There are several other instances of media bias that the WikiLeaks Podesta emails have uncovered. Obviously you won’t hear about much of it from the media elite, but it is possible to find if you just have the motivation to look.
Americans should care about this blatant media bias, because in essence, it’s the press that are controlling this year’s election by carefully selecting what you are exposed to and what you are not exposed to. They are manipulating you to make a decision based on (what I believe) are lies about Donald Trump, while doing everything they can to hide the massive amount of corruption surrounding his opponent.
While the mainstream media is obsessing over Trump’s relationship with women, the WikiLeaks Podesta emails have unveiled some very damning information about our Democratic presidential nominee, specifically things she has done in governmental positions of power and her attitude about the American people. Most news outlets haven’t touched it, don’t want to touch it, and likely won’t touch it, even though new bombshells are being revealed by the day and this process will continue until November 8.
I, for one, am sickened by it, and I’m done sitting idly by while the elites in this country actively deceive the American people. The most disturbing part of it is that there are plenty of people who willingly and passionately eat up everything the mainstream media publicizes, without even thinking to question the validity of what they’re being fed.
It looks as if our trust of the press, even the little of it that’s left, may well prove to be our downfall.
WikiLeaks say they’re saving the best for last, and based on what has come out so far, I can’t imagine how much worse the revealings could get for Hillary Clinton.
The things the WikiLeaks Podesta emails have uncovered should concern every American, whether you’re liberal, conservative, moderate, or otherwise.
While you read the following points, imagine if these things were coming out about Trump. Do you believe the media would ignore them the way they’ve been doing for Clinton?
While the New York Times is busy digging up dirt on Trump, they and other popular media outlets are completely ignoring the fact that Joe Podesta, Hillary’s campaign chairman, wrote in an email that he knows the former secretary of State “has begun to hate everyday Americans.”
— Linda Suhler, Ph.D. (@LindaSuhler) October 11, 2016
Really? She hates us? Then why on earth does she want to lead us? No matter what you think about Donald Trump, can you honestly say you’d be comfortable with a leader who has contempt for you? How could she possibly have respect for those she hates? Have you ever wanted to improve the life of someone you hate?
The WikiLeaks Podesta emails further reveal that Democrats don’t think much about their party’s civilian members. The Clintons are counting on an “unaware and compliant citizenry” in order for them to be successful, and this isn’t the first time such an idea has been exchanged among the Democrats via email.
— Anonymous (@AnonymousWiki) October 14, 2016
In an email exchanged on May 13, two DNC officials are discussing the releasing of scripts of the Wall Street speeches Hillary has given and been paid handsomely for. It’s obvious this is not something the former First Lady desires to do, as one staffer responded, “She wants to achieve consistency and the best way to do that is to keep the people ignorant.”
It doesn’t say, “make them ignorant,” or “drive them to ignorance.” The staffer wrote “keep them ignorant,” because they believe Americans who support Hillary Clinton are already ignorant, and for her to be able to thrive, it’s essential to keep them that way by promoting “consistency,” a trait that would go out the window if the public got a hold of the Wall Street scripts.
On the more disturbing side of things, in one February email a slang term, “wet work” or “wetwork,” for “murder” is used, and the context used around the term is nothing short of chilling.
“I am all in,” it reads, followed by, “Sounds like it will be a bad nite (sic), we all need to buckle up and double down.”
To this, John Podesta responds, “Didn’t think wet works meant pool parties at the Vineyard.”
According to new Wikileaks emails, three days before Justice Scalia died this email was sent, using the term “wet works”. The term is used exclusively in the Military meaning “Assassination”. . US Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia dies, aged 79. Scalia died in his sleep at age 79 on the night of February 12 or the morning of February 13, 2016, following an afternoon of quail hunting and dining at the Cibolo Creek Ranch in Shafter, Texas. Conspiracy theorists suspected foul play. . “We discovered the judge in bed, a pillow over his head. His bed clothes were unwrinkled,” John Poindexter, the ranch owner told the San Antonio Express-News, adding that Scalia “was lying very restfully. It looked like he had not quite awakened from a nap.” #antoninscalia #wetworks #wikileaks
Does this mean that someone was murdered at a pool party at “the Vineyard?” Or perhaps it means there was a celebration at “the Vineyard,” Martha’s perhaps, for the murder?
Some people are speculating that, because the “wet work” email was sent on February 9 and Justice Antonin Scalia was found dead on February 13, it could very well mean this email is referencing the murder of the late Supreme Court judge. Personally, what concerns me more than that possibility is Podesta and Steve Elmendorf’s lackadaisical attitude about the slaying of someone that can be perceived in this exchange.
The WikiLeaks Podesta emails are being released daily, making it somewhat difficult to keep up with every bombshell unveiled. The revealings I have shared herein are just the tip of the iceberg. The reality of “crooked Hillary” is finally at Americans’ fingertips, so it would be a shame if we were foolish enough to allow the media to prevail on November 8, thus sending our beautiful, free country straight into utter destruction. The time has come for Americans to wake up.
[Featured Image by Ric Frazier/Shuttershock]