He noted that the armada spotted passing by our Sun consisted of a main mothership, three smaller ships, and 10 smaller crafts, making a total of about 14 spaceships (see illustration above).
"There is a main mothership, three medium ships (yellow circle), and 10 tiny craft (red circles) following it," the alien hunter explains.
"Look how the long thin nose of the medium craft (above) is the same as the nose on the mothership below it," he continues. "It looks like they are traveling together because there is safety in numbers..."
Waring's observation that "they are traveling together because there is safety in numbers" is consistent with the claim that it was probably a fleet of merchant vessels flying in a group for protection against interstellar pirate vessels. The main mother ship and three smaller ships were probably cargo vessels and the smaller crafts probably included highly maneuverable fighters or attack crafts protecting precious cargo, UFO hunters suggested.
The observations by UFO hunters would not come as a surprise to enthusiasts who keep a close and regular watch on UFO traffic through our inner solar system as revealed by NASA's SOHO satellite photos. It is widely believed, based on the evidence of regular and heavy UFO traffic allegedly observed on SOHO images, that a major interstellar highway passes through our inner solar system and that our Sun is a major stopover for interstellar UFO ships traveling through our section of the Milky Way Galaxy.
Streetcap1 reported in July of 2015 about the discovery of a fleet of large identical alien motherships flying in a formation past our Sun. Responding to critics who insisted that the structures on the SOHO image were merely flaws in the digital imagery, the alien hunter pointed to the symmetric structure of the objects and argued that they were clearly three identical crafts with unmistakable aerodynamic features flying in a line formation.
The aerodynamic features of the objects (see video below) were inconsistent with the notion that they were merely accidental flaws in NASA's image, Streetcap1 argued.