inquisitrlogo

 
Former WikiLeaks Member Destroyed 3,500 Files Before They Could Be Published

Posted: August 23, 2011

Daniel Domscheit-Berg

Former WikiLeaks employee Daniel Domscheit-Berg has revealed that before leaving the company he destroyed 3,500 unpublished files, shreadding them “in order to ensure that the sources are not compromised.”

According to  Domscheit-Berg  the files included Washington’s “no-fly list” and site founder Julian Assange says information on 20 right-wing groups was also compromised.

In a statement released to the press Assange says his former employee kept cozy ties with US intelligence and police while claiming that the former Wikileaks member committed “sabotage” and improperly used chat logs for his book Inside WikiLeaks, chat logs that paint Assange in a less than favorable light.

It’s not necessarily that Domscheit-Berg didn’t want files to be distributed across the internet, he opened his own whistleblower website called OpenLeaks but then ran into issues when Germany’s top hacker group kicked him out and accused him of exploiting their work to benefit OpenLeaks.

Really Assange? You’re going to bitch and moan that files were used against you without your permission and that it was in some way an invasion of your privacy? Some people simply can’t take a dose of their own medicine.

Category: News
Tags : , ,
Posted: August 23, 2011
James Johnson

By James Johnson










Comments


3 Archived Responses to “ Former WikiLeaks Member Destroyed 3,500 Files Before They Could Be Published ”

  1. I'm astounded by the utter idiocy of the author. Is it possible that author can't distinguish between privacy of the individual and privacy of corporations and governments?

    Obviously it's possible but nevertheless.. you have to be a complete idiot not to notice the difference.

  2. The difference between the three entities, is how the law deals with each. Stealing is stealing, whether is is done against an individual, corporation, or government. What some don't understand, giving away information for the sake of 'transparency' isn't what leaking is about. It is the person who stole the information who has risked the most, Julian Assange doesn't care about that. All he wants to do is find something to support his belief.

    However, what was missed in this story is that the information never was the property of Wikileaks.

    Some people should take the time to read about espionage, and try to understand the laws against it.