Category: Odd + Funny Author : Samantha DeWitt Posted: November 19, 2008
Tags : , , , , , , , , , ,
Subscribe: Tech Feed, Email, Twitter

PETA says meat eaters should pay more insurance


    StumbleUpon Digg Reddit Mixx del.icio.us MySpace Fark Facebook TwitThis Propeller Wikio Yahoo! Buzz

 

That wacky mob PETA, fresh from “flouring” Lindsay Lohan in Paris has sent a letter to BlueCross BlueShield health insurance company in Vermont on behalf of their 2 million members asking that health insurance premiums be raised for meat eaters and reduced for vegetarians.

They state that meat eating is linked to some of America’s “deadliest diseases” and that agreeing to this request will result in the company saving money,  which we all know PETA cares about.

PETA argues that a a cut in insurance premiums would give people an “incentive” to do without meat and that will make them healthier.  The letter also warns of the danger of E coli outbreak.  I would be more worried about catching the outbreak of smug, superiority that normally accompanies being a vegetarian and PETA member.  

BlueCross BlueShield said that discrimination on the grounds of eating preferences was illegal in every state. They obviously didn’t feel the need to add the bit about how they couldn’t give a crap about what PETA thinks anyway.

Via ecosalon


You might also like




  • And in this letter, did PETA mention that being a vegetarian is so unnatural that they have to take supplements and eat constructed foods (like soy milk) in order to just stay alive? Because you know that thing called "protein"?

    You don't get it from eating broccoli 8x a day.

    --Kyle
  • jrrrl
    Um, that's completely not true. Vegetarians get plenty of protein without supplements, from normal foods like beans, grains, etc. You don't need to drink soy milk any more than you need to drink cow milk (which is also completely unnatural for humans). Many meat eaters drink soy milk because it tastes better to them and is healthier. The only special supplement recommended for non-meat eaters is B12 for vegans, because there are only a handful of vegan sources. Non-vegan vegetarians get plenty.

    It's a good idea for everyone to take a nutritional supplement, but without one, meat eaters on average have seven major nutritional deficiencies (calcium, iodine, vitamin C, vitamin E, fiber, folate, and magnesium) while vegans on average only have three (calcium, iodine, and B12).

    Large populations of people are strictly vegetarian and there are no health problems. 40% of the country of India is completely vegetarian -- they have health problems due to poverty, but not because they're vegetarian. Strictly vegetarian religious groups like Seventh Day Adventists in California have been studied and they live 5-7 years longer than similar groups of meat eaters. It's been well-studied and well-proven that eating meat raises your risk of diabetes, heart disease, and several cancers like stomach, colon, and breast cancer.

    Eating meat is the new smoking, and even if you cling to meat for your entire life, your children probably won't.
  • MonickerL
    I'm sorry but anybody who denies that humans are built to be omnivorous, and turns a blind eye to the evidence that we've adapted into being such from our herbivore ancestors, is fooling themselves.

    Yes, meat can cause problems for you, but so can a vegetarian/vegan diet if you don't moderate. If we just stopped stuffing our fat faces every waking moment, we'd be fine. With our meat, thank you very much.
  • jrrrl
    Humans have adapted to a lot of things -- including astronomical rates of death during childbirth and lifespans into your 40's if you're lucky. Evolution isn't destiny. All modern medicine and nutrition is "unnatural." A vegetarian diet makes you healthier, and does not cause problems except for the aforementioned B12 issue with vegans who don't eat the handful of natural sources.

    Evolution also didn't take into account global warming, for which eating meat (livestock specifically) is the #1 human cause.

    http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=20...
  • Glad to see you figured out how to use the 'reply' button.

    "Evolution also didn't take into account global warming, for which eating meat (livestock specifically) is the #1 human cause. "

    I'm glad you're ignorant. Because that frees me from responding to your original nonsense.

    --Kyle
  • jrrrl
    I provided the link to the UN study that says livestock is the #1 human-related cause of global warming. The United Nations is more ignorant than yourself? If you'd like to read the entire study and results (which I doubt, since you don't seem to be very intellectually curious), see below:

    http://www.fao.org/docrep/010/a0701e/a0701e00.htm
  • No the quote was me laughing at you.

    And the ignorance reference was just to you and your comments in general.

    I'm not "intellectually curious"? Well, I'm glad you have come to yet another amazingly perfect and correct conclusion.

    Maybe you should get your IQ tested... I'm betting you're MENSA quality.

    --Kyle
  • jrrrl
    Um, okay? Do I pal around with terrorists too?
  • You are so full of WIN.

    *end my caring about you and this thread*

    --Kyle
  • jrrrl
    Cool, thanks! ^_^
  • Anthonyga
    "40% of the country of India is completely vegetarian -- they have health problems due to poverty, but not because they're vegetarian."

    Sounds like we should ask BlueCross BlueShield to raise premiums on the poor.
  • jrrrl
    Men live 6 years shorter than women and have more chronic diseases. Meat-eating men live 11-13 years shorter than vegetarian women! We really need to stop these communist subsidies on meat-eating men.
  • I would like to think that those insurance companies that go ahead with this suggestion will go bankrupt instead. And I know of vegetarians who live healthy lifestyles, one of them even a bodybuilder.
  • Nothing wrong if you're eating meat. Just don't eat that kind of losing great animal meat. that' all
  • Dan
    And of course... Blue Cross and Blue Shield can OBVIOUSLY monitor people's dieting habits for no cost at all! No need to sift through millions of pieces of paperwork to make adjustments, no need to change methods of documentation and archiving data to find out things, no need to pay for auditors to make sure people are reporting honestly, it's all for free! FREE! Ahahahaha... sure PETA, sure, only if you guys pay for the invasion of privacy needed to pull this stunt off.
blog comments powered by Disqus
King.com (Midasplayer.com Ltd.)