Posted in: Celebrity News

Kate Middleton Bottomless Photos Published By Danish Magazine Se Og Hor

kate middleton

The entire world has seen Kate Middleton topless thanks to an extremely long zoom lens and questionable publishing etiquette. Danish Magazine Se Og Hor recently added to the scandal by publishing a few bottomless photos of the Duchess.

The photos appear to be from the same set of photos that were published by magazines in France, Ireland, and Italy. Se Og Hor published the photos on September 20.

A lawsuit will likely follow but Se Og Hor doesn’t seem to mind.

Se og Hør Editor Kim Henningsen, said:

“It’s a set of unique photos from an A-class celebrity. We are a leading gossip magazine in Denmark, and it is my job to publish them. If the British royal family want to sue us, then it will happen then and we’ll deal with it.”

Kate Middleton’s topless photos have been published in various magazines from Italy, France, and Ireland. French Magazine Closer even said that it had photos of Prince William and Kate Middleton having sex.

The royal family recently won their legal battle against the French magazine so it isn’t likely that the explicit photos will be published in Closer. Unfortunately for Kate and the Royal family it looks like there are plenty of other magazines willing to go to court over Middleton’s nude photos.

Here are some of the censored images from Se Og Hor.

kate middleton bottomlesskate middleton bottomlesskate middleton bottomless

[Correction: A previous version of this article stated that new bottomless photos of Kate Middleton were published this week in SE og HØR. The photos were published by the magazine on September 20 and did not include any new images.]

Articles And Offers From The Web

Comments

44 Responses to “Kate Middleton Bottomless Photos Published By Danish Magazine Se Og Hor”

  1. Christopher Koulouris

    The royals may have been able to get French journal Closer to comply because of tough privacy laws in that nation there but it seems for now the Royals will have to bear and grin it and understand that as distasteful as some would deem it they are public figures and the media will attempt at all times to disclose as much about them as possible even if it betrays certain decorum or what is perceived as appropriate media content, then again let’s define freedom of speech and whether we would even be making bones about these images if it wasn’t Kate Middleton but say a B rated celebrity instead….

    http://scallywagandvagabond.com/2012/09/nsfw-here-are-kate-middleton-topless-and-now-bottomless-pictures-courtesy-of-danish-magazine-se-og-hor/

  2. Sherrie Phillips

    Leave her and him alone! They have a right to do this in a non public setting and taking these photos of them at home is not right!

  3. Juniper Smith

    Photos, especially nude photos taken surreptitiously without the subjects knowledge or consent, are not "art"or public information. It is an invasion of privacy and further evidence of the decline of decency and respect for the individual in western society.

  4. Juniper Smith

    Photos, especially nude photos taken surreptitiously without the subjects knowledge or consent, are not "art"or public information. It is an invasion of privacy and further evidence of the decline of decency and respect for the individual in western society.

  5. Juniper Smith

    Photos, especially nude photos taken surreptitiously without the subjects knowledge or consent, are not "art"or public information. It is an invasion of privacy and further evidence of the decline of decency and respect for the individual in western society.

  6. Rio Wilshire

    There are no nude fotos of kate middleton in the nude nor topless. It was all a news media hoax to raise the news ratings. There are no nude fotos of kate middleton. It was all lies.

  7. George Bramwell Jr.

    I change security if I was a royal. If they can get close enough to shhot with a camera they could just as easily shot with a rifle. Plus she looks OUTSTANDING.

  8. Anonymous

    Sherrie is 10,000 percent right.

    Even so, people raised for decades with, in and around the paparazzi slime-eaters they have seen all their lives should really know better.

  9. Anonymous

    Yea and not everyone woman is a whore, willing to show their body off. It's called class, and even when someone tries to have some, this world and the lib ideas that manifest in it, break those who try to have a little decency. If it were my wife, I would have found this photographer. My wife, her body, is not yours.

  10. Bob Stewart

    That's silly. Hitting that target at a distance of 1000 meters is ridiculously complex. Probably a handful of people in the world could pull it off. Those people would not waste their talent on a low value target like the wife of the grandson of a useless monarch. What would they hope to accomplish? Changing who gets selected as the throne's representative in the Canadian government? Take a look at the map on this link and name the security detail that would have found this guy. http://www.smh.com.au/lifestyle/celebrity/how-paparazzi-get-pics-that-make-royals-snap-20120917-262pm.html

  11. Anna Herrick

    The paparazzi have skeletons in their closets. Kate has a right to do anything she wants in her own setting. If I had a body like hers I'd show my butt off. She's too much of a lady but I would have mooned them.

  12. Anonymous

    My last pay check was $9500 working 12 hours a week online. My sisters friend has been averaging 15k for months now and she works about 20 hours a week. I can't believe how easy it was once I tried it out. The potential with this is endless. This is what I do, Buzz17.cøm.

  13. Jamie Wilson

    Shame on the photographer for taking these photos. I know it is your job but have some class. They deserve privacy. It is wrong to take photos of them at their home and without their permission. That photographer and others that do stuff like this in my eyes are perverts.

  14. Stephena Helms Held

    They were not found nude in a public place and had every right to believe that they were private. The onus is on the photographers who went to extraordinary means to invade that privacy. SHAME on them and on the publishers who paid them for those photographs.

  15. Sandi Secor Payne

    Agreed. Hopefully she doesn't come to the same end as Princess Diana. The paparazzi had a big hand in her death.

  16. Anonymous

    So the young woman has boobs and a backside just like tens of millions of other women. So what!

  17. Buce McLaughlin

    Oh PLEASE.. All Kate wants to do is tan a little more of her body, than people do on a public beach! I wish these low life paparazzi leave them ALONE.
    They're a young beautiful couple and in love with each other…LEAVE THEM BE!

  18. Merlin Granberg

    That's the price you pay when you become sexy, rich and all most a Queen Royalty has it's fault's, but we can over look your fantastic body. Never could see why her father in law left Dianna for that UGLY pig.

  19. William Polk

    HEY WORLD , GROW THE HELL UP. YA SEEN ONE ASS YOU HAVE SEEN THEM ALL, DIFFERENT SHAPES AND SIZES BUT THEY ALL HAVE THE SAME FUNCTION. BIG DEAL. CIAO

  20. William Polk

    IF THE SIMPLE MINDED CLOWNS WHO HAVE A FIXATIONS ON ASSES, , SHOULD TAke a long fromAN l angle view of that putrobance that they see in the mirror , biggest examples of ass-holes god ever made. and the view is free. CIAO.

  21. Dijana Veljkovic

    They are beautiful couple and it just shows how intimate and comfortable with each other they are. Their marriage is a real thing. She is beautiful women! She still has my respect. Her nude pictures are art. She is so beautiful with the clothes or without. SHAME on the photographers who took these photos. He/she is a pervert.

  22. William Polk

    QUESTION,? ANY BODY EVER THOUGHT ONE WAY TO THIN OUT THESE SLUG PAPAPRAZZI, IS TO PUT A BOUNTY ON THEIR HIDES, BY THE LB, BY THE HEIGHT, WIDTH, SHOE SIZE, AND ETC, I AM SURE ANY REMAINS BROUGHT IN DEAD , WOULD STILL BE PAID THE GOING RATE, HMMMMMMMMMM, JUST A THOUGHT. CIAO

  23. Joan E Snudden

    This couple has the same anatomy as the rest of us. This magazine, of course, is all about making money.
    It has no morals.