Ron Paul Defends Anti-War Stance: America is Provoking, Not Preventing War

Is America preventing or provoking war in Iran? The common stance among the GOP candidates is that Iran is a nuclear threat and that without intervention by the US an attack on American soil is inevitable. Ron Paul, however, says that the biggest threat is America’s overreaction to rumors, which may provoke war.
Paul’s views aren’t popular with his fellow candidates. Michele Bachman said that she felt “threatened” by Paul’s views on foreign policy. Bachman said:
“With all due respect to Ron Paul, I think I have never heard a more dangerous answer for American security than the one that we just heard from Ron Paul… We know without a shadow of a doubt that Iran will take a nuclear weapon, they will use it to wipe our ally Israel off the face of the map and they stated they will use it against the United States of America.”
But Paul wonders why Iran would want to attack America? Do they want to attack America because we’re free and prosperous? Paul said:
“To declare war on 1.2 billion Muslims and say all Muslims are the same, this is dangerous talk. Yeah, there are some radicals. But they don’t come here to kill us because we’re free and prosperous. Do they go to Switzerland and Sweden? That is absurd… The CIA has explained it to us. It said they come here and they want to do us harm because we are bombing them.”
Paul also said that foreign wars are making America bankrupt. Paul added:
“Why do we have 900 bases in 130 countries and we’re totally bankrupt. How do you rebuild a military when we have no money? How are we going to take care of the people? I think this wild goal to have another war in the name of defense is the dangerous thing. The danger is really us overreacting. We need a strong national defense. And we need to only go to war with a declaration of war and carelessly flubbing it and starting these wars so often.”
Reuters reports that many of Paul’s views were booed by the audience and scoffed at by his fellow candidates. According to Politico, Fox News host Sean Hannity was also dismissive of Paul’s ideas about Iran. In an interview with Michele Bachman, Hannity said “position on Iran scares me.”
Paul’s spokesman Gary Howard said that the debate shouldn’t hurt Paul’s numbers because people are already well aware of his views. Howard said:
“People know his views, and he’s polling top three. His support is solid. He doesn’t lose votes once he’s got them.”
What do you think of Ron Paul’s view on Iran? Is America preventing or provoking war?








![Kansas TV Station Stabbing: Man Breaks Into Topeka’s WIBW News Station, Stabs 2 Employees [Video]](http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/2012/05/kansas-tv-station-stabbing-2012-wibw-tv-ray-miles-100x100.jpg)
![Katherine Heigl Shows Off Newly Adopted Daughter [Pics]](http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/2012/05/katherine-heigl-adopted-daughter-pics-1-100x100.jpg)







![Miley Cyrus Flashes Side Boob, Talks About Losing Her Viginity [Photo, NSFW]](http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/2012/05/o-MILEY-CYRUS-SIDE-BOOB-SEX-SCENE-VIRGINITY-570-100x100.jpg)



![Grieving Pit Bull Stays with Dead Mate for 14 Hours [Video]](http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/2012/05/grieving-pit-bull-phoenix-arizona-2012-video-100x100.jpg)

![Bill Clinton Takes Snapshot With Porn Stars [Photo]](http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/2012/05/Atm25wrCAAA_vSM-100x100.jpg)
Dec 16, 2011
RP is absolutely correct. I'm still shocked how many hoopleheads buy into these chicken hawks and their pro-war propaganda. Yet these other candidates still have the audacity to state that they're any different from the status quo. Newt, Mitt, Bachman, etc……they're no different from the trash that's already in Washington DC. Basically they'll continue waging costly wars and continue to make more enemies while we still suffer domestically.
Dec 16, 2011
Just look at our interventionist history concerning Iran: beginning with our part in the 1953 coup d'etat (and we were "shocked" about the hostage crisis; what did we expect?), our involvement on both sides in the Iran-Iraq war, and now our unfounded involvement in the conflicts between Israel and Iran; America has a long history of sticking its nose where it doesn't belong. Ron Paul is right; instead of jumping into another conflict (regardless of Congress' approval), we ought to pull out, pull back, and concentrate on our economic influences – influences which Iran and the rest of the Middle East have been using to sway us ever since their oil came under local control.
Dec 17, 2011
Dr. Paul is correct. It is our imperialistic globalist foreign policy that provokes hatred of America. America is supposed to be a shiny city on a hill – a standard that other nations emulate and adore. Until and unless we re-adopt a non-interventionist foreign policy akin to that of our founders, the city on a hill shall remain anything but shiny.
Dec 19, 2011
http://www.ronpaul2012.com/2011/12/17/have-trouble-with-ron-pauls-foreign-policy/
Jan 6, 2012
The fundamental problem is the bias of the media. That is, it is in the hands of wealthy persons who, more often than not, are Jewish-Israeli Americans. This, coupled with AIPAC and JINSA control of the political and military culture of the US, creates a paradigm in which all discussion is set. Most of these candidates rely heavily on the money of these big interests, and frankly it extends far beyond oil, and more into the big banks and, again, a predominance of Jewish-Israeli Americans. Fact is the Iranian people have been free of Western puppet government since the Islamic revolution, and Saddam was built up to take the Islamic revolutionary regime down. Saddam failed, and the US opted to remove him, and now that is done, they're back to Iran again, the original target. These wars are more to do with oil, than terrorism, but they are more to do with Israeli-interests, than oil.