Posted in: Travel

Driverless Cars Legality Raise Concerns

driverless-car-google

Driverless cars have come a long way in recent years, and the technology needed to make the concept a reality is nearly mature. Legal issues, not science, present one of the largest roadblocks between today and a driverless future.

Many car manufacturers, universities, and technology firms have experimented with the development of driverless cars since the late 2000s. While driverless cars are not yet for sale, the technology is further long than many people would suspect. Google’s driverless cars have managed to drive hundreds of thousands of miles without crashing. Google has lobbied for permission to drive their cars on open roads because developing the technology is only the first step of making driverless cars a reality.

Driverless cars are expected to save thousands of lives each year. The vast majority of vehicle accidents, 90 percent, are the result of human error. Driverless cars will appear on local roads within the next few decades, but they raise all kinds of legal concerns. If a driverless car gets into a crash, who is at fault?

An Arizona legislator attempted to address this issue by introducing a bill last year that would adjust state law to cover driverless cars.

“After I introduced the bill, then suddenly all the insurance companies started approaching me with the questions of the liability,” Jeff Dial told NPR. “The more you deal with this issue, the more the issue grows and grows.”

Nevada became the first state to legalize driverless cars in the summer of 2011. Since then, Florida and California have also permitted the vehicles. Colorado debated a bill that would allow driverless cars just last month, but it was ultimately shelved.

Drivers still need a driver’s license to operate driverless cars, but the technology grants a driver more freedom than traditional driving ever has. There’s the possibility that drivers would no longer be limited to the radio and could watch television instead. The Colorado bill would have allowed drivers to text behind the wheel, granted that the car was doing the driving.

Convenience aside, human nature remains a strong reason why driverless cars have not taken off sooner. Many car companies have introduced adaptive cruise control, which allows cars to drive at a safe distance without requiring input from the driver. A driver has to fight the urge to manually apply the brakes as they approach the rear of the car ahead. How will drivers adjust to traffic congestion where even a small number of the cars on the road are self-driven?

driverless-car-traffic

Car companies have created cars with lane-departure warnings and lane-change warnings and are experimenting with the idea of cars that can park themselves. The technology for driverless cars will have matured long before humanity is ready to let go of control of the wheel.

Articles And Offers From The Web

Comments

5 Responses to “Driverless Cars Legality Raise Concerns”

  1. Eric Mariacher

    We’ve been told that Mercedes is going to sell a driverless car in 2013. But the car will be driverless for 10 seconds i.e. drivers will be allowed to have their hand off the steering wheel for a maximum of 10 seconds. As far as I read, the driver will still be liable if anything bad happens during the time he has his hands off the wheel.

    For the following years, we can reasonably anticipate that these 10 seconds will become 20 then 30 seconds and even a minute. From here let’s ask a series of questions:
    The biggest one being: “What is the limit from where drivers having an accident, when his car is in automated mode, will be able to attack the car manufacturer?”.
    * Who will decide what the limit is?
    – car manufacturers, government or insurers?

    * How do we prove that the accident happened while the car was in driverless mode?
    – Do driverless cars need some airplane like black boxes?

    http://driverless-cars.blogspot.fr/2013/01/who-will-be-liable-for-driverless-car.html

  2. Andrew Atkin

    Oh – it certainly won't be decades. The latent demand and practical appeal is far too strong. I don't know why people keep saying it's going to take so long. That's just nonsense.

  3. BiModal Glideway

    It seems like it will take longer to get the legal part of all this worked out because of safety concerns. So why not add coexisting technologies such as our BiModal Glideway Dual Mode Transportation System. One of Our Main concerns here at BiModal Glideway is safety, so by add our glideway to other autonomous programs could only help push for a safer future. visit our website at bimodalglideway.com for more information and you can email us with any questions or comment you may have.