Tweet 

Miley Cyrus BJ “leaked photo” doing the rounds, likely fake

You idiot, you got it backwards.

This is a photo montage somebody else posted in order to show that it WASN'T fake.

These other photos were posted to show that the face in the picture is indeed Miley Cyrus, as they look very much like her.

You fail.

That pic was made AFTER the original miley cyrus BJ photo appeared on the internet! To compare her face structure to the one on the photo! DUMBASSES

it's fake you jackasses who think it's real. Evidentally you know nothing about photoshop. It's fake.

What “yeah” said some 33 minutes ago, plus the original “BJ” image's EXIF data, which corresponds with the other leaked shots perfectly.

THE PICTURE IS REAL. THE MONTAGE WAS DONE TO SHOW SIMILARITY OF FACIAL FEATURES.

Camera: Research In Motion BlackBerry 9000
Flash: No flash function
Focus: At 0mm
Date: April 9, 2009 1:54:32PM (timezone not specified)
(2 months, 6 days, 16 hours, 42 minutes, 37 seconds ago, assuming an image timezone of US Pacific)
File: 1,200 × 1,600 JPEG (1.9 megapixels)
183,381 bytes (0.17 megabytes) Image compression: 97%
Color Encoding:
WARNING: Color space tagged as sRGB, without an embedded color profile. Windows and Mac web browsers will treat the colors randomly.
Images for the web are most widly viewable when in the sRGB color space and with an embedded color profile. See my Introduction to Digital-Image Color Spaces for more information.
Url: http:/ / cgi.4chan.org/ r/ src/ 1245155862442.jpg

Here's the full data:

EXIF — this group of metadata is encoded in 402 bytes (0.4k)
Color Space sRGB
Components Configuration YCbCr
Date/Time Original 2009:04:09 13:54:32
2 months, 6 days, 16 hours, 42 minutes, 37 seconds ago
Device Setting Description (0 bytes binary data)
Exif Image Size 1,600 × 1,200
Exif Version 0220
Exposure Time 0
Flash No flash function
Light Source Unknown
Make Research In Motion
Camera Model Name BlackBerry 9000
Modify Date 2009:04:09 13:54:32
2 months, 6 days, 16 hours, 42 minutes, 37 seconds ago
Orientation Horizontal (normal)
Resolution 72 pixels/inch
Software Rim Exif Version1.00a
Subject Distance 0 m
Y Cb Cr Positioning Co-sited

wow you people are seriously brain dead.

the montage was put together by the people trying to prove this was legit!

find me someone who can take the picture on the top left and turn it into the actual blow job pic, and i'll die of shock. its to show the facial structure is the same.

there is data taken from mrs.blowJ's twitter pics that show it is taken with a blackberry, just like the data from the original blowjob pic shows as well.

There's only one legitimate place I've found to see the UNCENSORED version of this and a small video, the rest seem like scams :-/ You can see it over here though: http://vostuu.com/watch28015.html

They make you do a little survey but after that it's good to go

There's only one legitimate place I've found to see the UNCENSORED version of this and a small video, the rest seem like scams :-/ You can see it over here though: http://vostuu.com/watch28015.html

They make you do a little survey but after that it's good to go

I think it's realy

It sure looks like her. I filled out a quick survey and saw a picture and a video! Check it out:
http://vostuu.com/watch20039.html

Wow, that middle one looks real!!!!

EXIF data confirms as real.

The montage of photos of Miley kissing was put together far after this photo was taken. The compilation of photographs is only to prove that the Miley photo is in fact, legitimate. Notice how none of the faces match up with the one in her blow job picture? That's because, believe it or not, Miley Cyrus actually gave a blow job!! Shocking, isn't it? Saying this photo is fake without evidence is bad journalism. But sooner or later, this evidence will be proven, and all you ignorant “journalists” and fans will have to admit how not so innocent our little role model really is.

What “yeah” said some 33 minutes ago, plus the original “BJ” image's EXIF data, which corresponds with the other leaked shots perfectly.

THE PICTURE IS REAL. THE MONTAGE WAS DONE TO SHOW SIMILARITY OF FACIAL FEATURES.

Camera: Research In Motion BlackBerry 9000
Flash: No flash function
Focus: At 0mm
Date: April 9, 2009 1:54:32PM (timezone not specified)
(2 months, 6 days, 16 hours, 42 minutes, 37 seconds ago, assuming an image timezone of US Pacific)
File: 1,200 × 1,600 JPEG (1.9 megapixels)
183,381 bytes (0.17 megabytes) Image compression: 97%
Color Encoding:
WARNING: Color space tagged as sRGB, without an embedded color profile. Windows and Mac web browsers will treat the colors randomly.
Images for the web are most widly viewable when in the sRGB color space and with an embedded color profile. See my Introduction to Digital-Image Color Spaces for more information.
Url: http:/ / cgi.4chan.org/ r/ src/ 1245155862442.jpg

Here's the full data:
………

——————————————————————–

hahahahhahahh OMG if thats legit than that means it was taken on my 16th birthday hahah SHITT SON

this is retarded, one can clearly see that the faces from the “source” photos are not shot at the same angle. Personally, I think it's real.

That image was made to compare the pose of miley in the picture with other similar pose. Thus, to prove it was her. Check the EXIF data… the picture was never edited.

What the hell is on that guy's ear?

I do think the first pictures are the same. But in the second one… unless they added extra hair to her and flipped the guy's hand upside down I don't know.

That image, if anything, proves that it's a real picture. Neither picture is close enough to be shopped to the middle picture, but they both show the similarities in the face/jawline, etc.

I hope it's not real, but I think it might be :/

He's not a very big boy is he.

Guys this is not real.
Also do not use the links that say it is a video – It is not. They are spam/viruses.

The picture data does not prove anything. All it does is show that the original photo (out of any the above) was used.

The picture in the article proves damn right that this is a fake.
Also I know for a fact it is fake.

The date on the image data provided does not match where Miley was at that time

dumbasses! PHOTOSHOPPED! I dont even like Miley yet I know its fake. They took the top 2 pics & photoshopped them into the one in the middle so her face will look like that.

It's real you idiots! This needs to get out to the presses! I want to see Miley's downfall.

@ Chelsea

Bitch you stupid. Read other people's comments before you post yours, immediately jumping to conclusions just like the author.

Uh, sorry to burst your bubble, but even though I haven't actually seen the picture in question, I work for the Government and I know for a fact that even EXIF data can be easily altered by someone who knows what they are doing. You can even find programs on the internet that will help you if you look hard enough. Just because the EXIF data is the same as some other picture, doesn't mean it was taken by the same camera or at a specific time or anything else.

http://tinyurl.com/Miley-Cyrus-BJ what about the real video???

Look at it again, sir. Look at the shape and span of the lip opening foremost. It’s different. The entire angle of her head is different. You can’t do that with photoshop, dumbass.
Stop pretending that you know what photoshop can do and GTFO.

I think you’re just a fucking Miley Cyrus fangirl. It was real, get the fuck over it. The person you replied to offered the evidence, you offered no counter-evidence.

^Denial.

Probably the same guy I replied to earlier. You don’t know the extents of photoshop. It can’t edit angles like that. I could produce a fake BJ image with the photos very easily, but you would notice the angle difference.