inquisitrlogo

 
Google Lively not well recieved


Google launched virtual world service Lively earlier today and The Inquisitr’s JR Raphael finished his post with the words “Looks like we may have another Google home run on our hands.” I know where JR is coming from as anything Google launches immediately has a weight of presence that over the middle to long run delivers hits with the majority of services. I’d note though that a hit doesn’t necessarily mean a market leader, but certainly enough users to make it a top five product in the space with millions of users.

My initial negative on the product was a lack of support for Macs, a very un-Google like product launch. Daring to open Windows in VMWare Fusion, I eventually decided to give it a go. Maybe it doesn’t like Vista in a virtual machine, but I found Lively close to unusable. Slow to load, clunky to use, and the popular rooms devoid of avatars to interact with. Underwhelmed isn’t the half of my reaction. But am I alone? Here’s a pick of the coverage from FriendFeed. I tried to find someone who praises it, but aside from a couple of people suggesting that we should all give it a longer chance, I couldn’t find any positives reviews.

Mine kept closing itself down before I could choose a character. Will keep trying. – sergiooooooo
i agree, at first glance… FAIL – tommy payne










Comments


6 Archived Responses to “ Google Lively not well recieved ”

  1. Score_Under
    Jul 9, 2008

    Google lively really failed. I tried four times and all of the times I got a segmentation fault.
    To google: Get a better programmer.

  2. We've done a small review of Lively here – http://www.metaversejournal.com/2008/07/09/live… – I think it's a long way of stinking, particularly when compared to some of the lesser worlds already on the market. That said – no Mac support is another major failing IMO.

  3. Word Smith
    Jul 10, 2008

    'i' before 'e', except after 'c'
    Google Lively not well received

  4. I'm an educator. Here's my review:
    .