inquisitrlogo

 
Church of Scientology Spied On Southpark Creators Trey Parker and Matt Stone, Found Nothing

Posted: October 24, 2011

Trey Parker and Matt Stone

When Trey Parker and Matt Stone aired the South Park episode Trapped in the Closet which poked fun at the highest beliefs held by the church of Scientology whiling also poking fun at two of their best known members John Travolta and Tom Cruise the church decided not to sit by idly and take the jabs at face value.

According to internal documents which were recently unearthed by Marty Rathbun, a former Scientology executive, the church called for a “classic” investigation into the men’s lives.

That “classic” investigation is said to have included identifying the friends of Stone and Parker, performing public records checks and even going through both men’s garbage to find any incriminating evidence they could rustle up.

Rathbun says the church went through trash bins for:

“Phone records. Bank records. Personal letters that expose some kind of vulnerability. They’ll read stuff into the kind of alcohol you’re drinking and how much. Prescriptions. They’ll figure out your diet. They can find out a lot about you through your trash.”

Speaking about how much dirt the investigation was digging up Rathbun told The Village Voice:

“You can see that the commanding officer is pissed off and not enough is getting done.”

I personally find it hilarious that the church of scientology thought any dirt dug up on the creators of South Park would in same way allow them to pull strings, after all these are the same guys who make fun of mentally handicapped people, god, mormons and rednecks, sometimes all at once, bad publicity for South Park is Christmas come early.

Do you think the Church of Scientology was being petty in their attempts to dig up “dirt” on Trey Parker and Matt Stone?

Category: Celebrity News
Tags : , , ,
Posted: October 24, 2011
James Johnson

By James Johnson









Comments


333 Archived Responses to “ Church of Scientology Spied On Southpark Creators Trey Parker and Matt Stone, Found Nothing ”

  1. And so what if they did? It's not as if Trey and Matt are candidates for political office, and digging up skeletons would derail their campaigns. South Park and the occasional movie they've made have pretty loyal followings – it would take quite a horrific revelation about them to peel away their fan base.

  2. Lol, even if they did find something I could imagine an episode where they would just make light of the entire situation. That being said, Matt and Trey are very normal people from what I've seen and it doesn't surprise me nothin turned up. Just glad the money was wasted on this stupid investigation and not the corrupting of some other unfortunate soul.

  3. The Church of Scientology is petty in everything they do.

  4. This isn't petty, this is strait up malicious.

  5. Brandon K. Foat
    Sep 6, 2012

    When do they think these guys would have the time to do something sinister behind closed doors that could be used as blackmail? They're ALWAYS working on a new project. Plus, it wasn't like the Mormon episode where they just kept saying that Mormonism is dumb. AND the entire musical that they made about the Mormon faith was well recieved. Even Mormons realized that any publicity is good publicity. They literally didn't let it bother them. It's because they BELIEVE in their faith, whether it was conjured up or not. Scientologists KNOW that there's was made up, don't actually believe in it, but don't want the world to know its horse shit and that they're wrong and will do whatever to cover up the fact thereof.

  6. Brandon K. Foat
    Sep 6, 2012

    When do they think these guys would have the time to do something sinister behind closed doors that could be used as blackmail? They're ALWAYS working on a new project. Plus, it wasn't like the Mormon episode where they just kept saying that Mormonism is dumb. AND the entire musical that they made about the Mormon faith was well recieved. Even Mormons realized that any publicity is good publicity. They literally didn't let it bother them. It's because they BELIEVE in their faith, whether it was conjured up or not. Scientologists KNOW that there's was made up, don't actually believe in it, but don't want the world to know its horse shit and that they're wrong and will do whatever to cover up the fact thereof.

  7. Brandon K. Foat
    Sep 6, 2012

    When do they think these guys would have the time to do something sinister behind closed doors that could be used as blackmail? They're ALWAYS working on a new project. Plus, it wasn't like the Mormon episode where they just kept saying that Mormonism is dumb. AND the entire musical that they made about the Mormon faith was well recieved. Even Mormons realized that any publicity is good publicity. They literally didn't let it bother them. It's because they BELIEVE in their faith, whether it was conjured up or not. Scientologists KNOW that there's was made up, don't actually believe in it, but don't want the world to know its horse shit and that they're wrong and will do whatever to cover up the fact thereof.

  8. Brandon K. Foat
    Sep 6, 2012

    When do they think these guys would have the time to do something sinister behind closed doors that could be used as blackmail? They're ALWAYS working on a new project. Plus, it wasn't like the Mormon episode where they just kept saying that Mormonism is dumb. AND the entire musical that they made about the Mormon faith was well recieved. Even Mormons realized that any publicity is good publicity. They literally didn't let it bother them. It's because they BELIEVE in their faith, whether it was conjured up or not. Scientologists KNOW that there's was made up, don't actually believe in it, but don't want the world to know its horse shit and that they're wrong and will do whatever to cover up the fact thereof.

  9. Brandon K. Foat
    Sep 6, 2012

    When do they think these guys would have the time to do something sinister behind closed doors that could be used as blackmail? They're ALWAYS working on a new project. Plus, it wasn't like the Mormon episode where they just kept saying that Mormonism is dumb. AND the entire musical that they made about the Mormon faith was well recieved. Even Mormons realized that any publicity is good publicity. They literally didn't let it bother them. It's because they BELIEVE in their faith, whether it was conjured up or not. Scientologists KNOW that there's was made up, don't actually believe in it, but don't want the world to know its horse shit and that they're wrong and will do whatever to cover up the fact thereof.

  10. Brandon K. Foat
    Sep 6, 2012

    When do they think these guys would have the time to do something sinister behind closed doors that could be used as blackmail? They're ALWAYS working on a new project. Plus, it wasn't like the Mormon episode where they just kept saying that Mormonism is dumb. AND the entire musical that they made about the Mormon faith was well recieved. Even Mormons realized that any publicity is good publicity. They literally didn't let it bother them. It's because they BELIEVE in their faith, whether it was conjured up or not. Scientologists KNOW that there's was made up, don't actually believe in it, but don't want the world to know its horse shit and that they're wrong and will do whatever to cover up the fact thereof.

  11. Brandon K. Foat
    Sep 6, 2012

    When do they think these guys would have the time to do something sinister behind closed doors that could be used as blackmail? They're ALWAYS working on a new project. Plus, it wasn't like the Mormon episode where they just kept saying that Mormonism is dumb. AND the entire musical that they made about the Mormon faith was well recieved. Even Mormons realized that any publicity is good publicity. They literally didn't let it bother them. It's because they BELIEVE in their faith, whether it was conjured up or not. Scientologists KNOW that there's was made up, don't actually believe in it, but don't want the world to know its horse shit and that they're wrong and will do whatever to cover up the fact thereof.

  12. Brandon K. Foat
    Sep 6, 2012

    When do they think these guys would have the time to do something sinister behind closed doors that could be used as blackmail? They're ALWAYS working on a new project. Plus, it wasn't like the Mormon episode where they just kept saying that Mormonism is dumb. AND the entire musical that they made about the Mormon faith was well recieved. Even Mormons realized that any publicity is good publicity. They literally didn't let it bother them. It's because they BELIEVE in their faith, whether it was conjured up or not. Scientologists KNOW that there's was made up, don't actually believe in it, but don't want the world to know its horse shit and that they're wrong and will do whatever to cover up the fact thereof.

  13. Brandon K. Foat
    Sep 6, 2012

    When do they think these guys would have the time to do something sinister behind closed doors that could be used as blackmail? They're ALWAYS working on a new project. Plus, it wasn't like the Mormon episode where they just kept saying that Mormonism is dumb. AND the entire musical that they made about the Mormon faith was well recieved. Even Mormons realized that any publicity is good publicity. They literally didn't let it bother them. It's because they BELIEVE in their faith, whether it was conjured up or not. Scientologists KNOW that there's was made up, don't actually believe in it, but don't want the world to know its horse shit and that they're wrong and will do whatever to cover up the fact thereof.

  14. Brandon K. Foat
    Sep 6, 2012

    When do they think these guys would have the time to do something sinister behind closed doors that could be used as blackmail? They're ALWAYS working on a new project. Plus, it wasn't like the Mormon episode where they just kept saying that Mormonism is dumb. AND the entire musical that they made about the Mormon faith was well recieved. Even Mormons realized that any publicity is good publicity. They literally didn't let it bother them. It's because they BELIEVE in their faith, whether it was conjured up or not. Scientologists KNOW that there's was made up, don't actually believe in it, but don't want the world to know its horse shit and that they're wrong and will do whatever to cover up the fact thereof.

  15. Brandon K. Foat
    Sep 6, 2012

    When do they think these guys would have the time to do something sinister behind closed doors that could be used as blackmail? They're ALWAYS working on a new project. Plus, it wasn't like the Mormon episode where they just kept saying that Mormonism is dumb. AND the entire musical that they made about the Mormon faith was well recieved. Even Mormons realized that any publicity is good publicity. They literally didn't let it bother them. It's because they BELIEVE in their faith, whether it was conjured up or not. Scientologists KNOW that there's was made up, don't actually believe in it, but don't want the world to know its horse shit and that they're wrong and will do whatever to cover up the fact thereof.

  16. Brandon K. Foat
    Sep 6, 2012

    When do they think these guys would have the time to do something sinister behind closed doors that could be used as blackmail? They're ALWAYS working on a new project. Plus, it wasn't like the Mormon episode where they just kept saying that Mormonism is dumb. AND the entire musical that they made about the Mormon faith was well recieved. Even Mormons realized that any publicity is good publicity. They literally didn't let it bother them. It's because they BELIEVE in their faith, whether it was conjured up or not. Scientologists KNOW that there's was made up, don't actually believe in it, but don't want the world to know its horse shit and that they're wrong and will do whatever to cover up the fact thereof.

  17. This is why I flush my trash down the toilet and defecate in my garbage bin.

  18. This is why I flush my trash down the toilet and defecate in my garbage bin.

  19. This is why I flush my trash down the toilet and defecate in my garbage bin.

  20. This is why I flush my trash down the toilet and defecate in my garbage bin.

  21. This is why I flush my trash down the toilet and defecate in my garbage bin.

  22. This is why I flush my trash down the toilet and defecate in my garbage bin.

  23. This is why I flush my trash down the toilet and defecate in my garbage bin.

  24. This is why I flush my trash down the toilet and defecate in my garbage bin.

  25. This is why I flush my trash down the toilet and defecate in my garbage bin.

  26. This is why I flush my trash down the toilet and defecate in my garbage bin.

  27. This is why I flush my trash down the toilet and defecate in my garbage bin.

  28. This is why I flush my trash down the toilet and defecate in my garbage bin.

  29. GET OUT OF THE CLOSET TOM CRUISE.

  30. "Hey, this guys into a lot of shit"

  31. Stop replying to yourself

  32. Anthony Gatto
    Sep 6, 2012

    Really. These are the same guys who admitted dropping LSD before the Oscars and show up wearing dresses. What could that crazy cult find to hold against them. I see a new episode of South Park in this story.

  33. Anonymous
    Sep 6, 2012

    These guys showed up at the oscars in dresses on ACID! What did they think they could find worse than that that would cause them embarresment? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

  34. Anonymous
    Sep 6, 2012

    These guys showed up at the oscars in dresses on ACID! What did they think they could find worse than that that would cause them embarresment? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

  35. Anonymous
    Sep 6, 2012

    These guys showed up at the oscars in dresses on ACID! What did they think they could find worse than that that would cause them embarresment? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

  36. I think that even if their car tires were made out of babies I'd still love them.

  37. Shocker. Another sad attempt by the fraud called scientology to intimidate those who speak the truth about them.
    A sect who was founded by a thief and fraudster behaves dishonestly and unethically? Is anyone surprised?

  38. Shocker. Another sad attempt by the fraud called scientology to intimidate those who speak the truth about them.
    A sect who was founded by a thief and fraudster behaves dishonestly and unethically? Is anyone surprised?

  39. Shocker. Another sad attempt by the fraud called scientology to intimidate those who speak the truth about them.
    A sect who was founded by a thief and fraudster behaves dishonestly and unethically? Is anyone surprised?

  40. lol reddit

  41. How does a pyramid scheme get to become a "church", one and two are their numbers closer to cult status? Their actions are clearly cult like.

  42. Kirill Gennadyevich Shishkabob
    Sep 6, 2012
  43. Kirill Gennadyevich Shishkabob
    Sep 6, 2012
  44. Kirill Gennadyevich Shishkabob
    Sep 6, 2012
  45. Kirill Gennadyevich Shishkabob
    Sep 6, 2012
  46. Kirill Gennadyevich Shishkabob
    Sep 6, 2012
  47. Kirill Gennadyevich Shishkabob
    Sep 6, 2012
  48. Kirill Gennadyevich Shishkabob
    Sep 6, 2012
  49. Kirill Gennadyevich Shishkabob
    Sep 6, 2012
  50. Kirill Gennadyevich Shishkabob
    Sep 6, 2012
  51. Kirill Gennadyevich Shishkabob
    Sep 6, 2012
  52. It's not a Church, it's a Cult. L Ron Hubbard once said "Writing for a penny a word is ridiculous. If a man really wanted to make a million dollars, the best way to do it would be start his own religion" and so he did and these retards bought into it. Hubbard was a crappy science fiction writer and his worst work was "Dianetics". How can these people be so stupid?

  53. "That being said, Matt and Trey are very normal people…"
    I've always thought about this as the very reason for their show's success.

  54. "That being said, Matt and Trey are very normal people…"
    I've always thought about this as the very reason for their show's success.

  55. "That being said, Matt and Trey are very normal people…"
    I've always thought about this as the very reason for their show's success.

  56. "That being said, Matt and Trey are very normal people…"
    I've always thought about this as the very reason for their show's success.

  57. "That being said, Matt and Trey are very normal people…"
    I've always thought about this as the very reason for their show's success.

  58. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    You're what's wrong with the world.

  59. Does this guy not have an editor? God. That was painful to read.

  60. Tyler Hopkins
    Sep 6, 2012

    It'd be a good use for all those babies they have lying around.

  61. Wow. they're as stupid as their "religion" if you can even call it that. that's fucking pathetic, matt and trey should get to call for psych testing on these fucks because they would all end up in some asylum XD.

  62. Wow. they're as stupid as their "religion" if you can even call it that. that's fucking pathetic, matt and trey should get to call for psych testing on these fucks because they would all end up in some asylum XD.

  63. the whole chrush is a fucking joke

  64. all religion is

  65. *your

  66. *your

  67. When did this "investigation" occur? That episode aired nearly a decade ago.

  68. When did this "investigation" occur? That episode aired nearly a decade ago.

  69. Other than them being two middle aged guys making cardboard cutouts of 7 year olds…perfectly normal.

  70. Other than them being two middle aged guys making cardboard cutouts of 7 year olds…perfectly normal.

  71. Adam Stackpole
    Sep 6, 2012

    ^………….why?

  72. Adam Stackpole
    Sep 6, 2012

    ^………….why?

  73. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    No, 'you are what's wrong with the world.' You're- You are. If you're going to correct someone, make sure you yourself understand the English language fully first.

  74. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    No, 'you are what's wrong with the world.' You're- You are. If you're going to correct someone, make sure you yourself understand the English language fully first.

  75. I liked Mission Earth. And as for Battlefield Earth, don't even think about watching the movie.. oh, you did. hehe.

  76. I bet you anything this situation is going to be in the next episode of Southpark. I can just imagine a scene where Scientoglogists and Tom Cruise are digging through Stan's garbage in the middle of the night. Randy opens the front door 'Staannnnnn?'

  77. Oh Lawwwwwdy

  78. Gabby, are you saying Reddit users are what's wrong in the world?

  79. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    No, I'm saying that when Redditors visit a link and post in the comments section: 'hurr reddit was here' and such like, it just degrades the reputation of both sites and makes them look like they're 11 years old.

  80. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    No, I'm saying that when Redditors visit a link and post in the comments section: 'hurr reddit was here' and such like, it just degrades the reputation of both sites and makes them look like they're 11 years old.

  81. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    No, I'm saying that when Redditors visit a link and post in the comments section: 'hurr reddit was here' and such like, it just degrades the reputation of both sites and makes them look like they're 11 years old.

  82. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    No, I'm saying that when Redditors visit a link and post in the comments section: 'hurr reddit was here' and such like, it just degrades the reputation of both sites and makes them look like they're 11 years old.

  83. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    No, I'm saying that when Redditors visit a link and post in the comments section: 'hurr reddit was here' and such like, it just degrades the reputation of both sites and makes them look like they're 11 years old.

  84. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    No, I'm saying that when Redditors visit a link and post in the comments section: 'hurr reddit was here' and such like, it just degrades the reputation of both sites and makes them look like they're 11 years old.

  85. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    No, I'm saying that when Redditors visit a link and post in the comments section: 'hurr reddit was here' and such like, it just degrades the reputation of both sites and makes them look like they're 11 years old.

  86. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    No, I'm saying that when Redditors visit a link and post in the comments section: 'hurr reddit was here' and such like, it just degrades the reputation of both sites and makes them look like they're 11 years old.

  87. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    No, I'm saying that when Redditors visit a link and post in the comments section: 'hurr reddit was here' and such like, it just degrades the reputation of both sites and makes them look like they're 11 years old.

  88. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    No, I'm saying that when Redditors visit a link and post in the comments section: 'hurr reddit was here' and such like, it just degrades the reputation of both sites and makes them look like they're 11 years old.

  89. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    No, I'm saying that when Redditors visit a link and post in the comments section: 'hurr reddit was here' and such like, it just degrades the reputation of both sites and makes them look like they're 11 years old.

  90. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    No, I'm saying that when Redditors visit a link and post in the comments section: 'hurr reddit was here' and such like, it just degrades the reputation of both sites and makes them look like they're 11 years old.

  91. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    No, I'm saying that when Redditors visit a link and post in the comments section: 'hurr reddit was here' and such like, it just degrades the reputation of both sites and makes them look like they're 11 years old.

  92. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    No, I'm saying that when Redditors visit a link and post in the comments section: 'hurr reddit was here' and such like, it just degrades the reputation of both sites and makes them look like they're 11 years old.

  93. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    No, I'm saying that when Redditors visit a link and post in the comments section: 'hurr reddit was here' and such like, it just degrades the reputation of both sites and makes them look like they're 11 years old.

  94. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    No, I'm saying that when Redditors visit a link and post in the comments section: 'hurr reddit was here' and such like, it just degrades the reputation of both sites and makes them look like they're 11 years old.

  95. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    No, I'm saying that when Redditors visit a link and post in the comments section: 'hurr reddit was here' and such like, it just degrades the reputation of both sites and makes them look like they're 11 years old.

  96. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    No, I'm saying that when Redditors visit a link and post in the comments section: 'hurr reddit was here' and such like, it just degrades the reputation of both sites and makes them look like they're 11 years old.

  97. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    No, I'm saying that when Redditors visit a link and post in the comments section: 'hurr reddit was here' and such like, it just degrades the reputation of both sites and makes them look like they're 11 years old.

  98. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    No, I'm saying that when Redditors visit a link and post in the comments section: 'hurr reddit was here' and such like, it just degrades the reputation of both sites and makes them look like they're 11 years old.

  99. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    No, I'm saying that when Redditors visit a link and post in the comments section: 'hurr reddit was here' and such like, it just degrades the reputation of both sites and makes them look like they're 11 years old.

  100. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    No, I'm saying that when Redditors visit a link and post in the comments section: 'hurr reddit was here' and such like, it just degrades the reputation of both sites and makes them look like they're 11 years old.

  101. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    No, I'm saying that when Redditors visit a link and post in the comments section: 'hurr reddit was here' and such like, it just degrades the reputation of both sites and makes them look like they're 11 years old.

  102. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    No, I'm saying that when Redditors visit a link and post in the comments section: 'hurr reddit was here' and such like, it just degrades the reputation of both sites and makes them look like they're 11 years old.

  103. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    No, I'm saying that when Redditors visit a link and post in the comments section: 'hurr reddit was here' and such like, it just degrades the reputation of both sites and makes them look like they're 11 years old.

  104. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    No, I'm saying that when Redditors visit a link and post in the comments section: 'hurr reddit was here' and such like, it just degrades the reputation of both sites and makes them look like they're 11 years old.

  105. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    No, I'm saying that when Redditors visit a link and post in the comments section: 'hurr reddit was here' and such like, it just degrades the reputation of both sites and makes them look like they're 11 years old.

  106. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    No, I'm saying that when Redditors visit a link and post in the comments section: 'hurr reddit was here' and such like, it just degrades the reputation of both sites and makes them look like they're 11 years old.

  107. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    No, I'm saying that when Redditors visit a link and post in the comments section: 'hurr reddit was here' and such like, it just degrades the reputation of both sites and makes them look like they're 11 years old.

  108. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    No, I'm saying that when Redditors visit a link and post in the comments section: 'hurr reddit was here' and such like, it just degrades the reputation of both sites and makes them look like they're 11 years old.

  109. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    No, I'm saying that when Redditors visit a link and post in the comments section: 'hurr reddit was here' and such like, it just degrades the reputation of both sites and makes them look like they're 11 years old.

  110. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    No, I'm saying that when Redditors visit a link and post in the comments section: 'hurr reddit was here' and such like, it just degrades the reputation of both sites and makes them look like they're 11 years old.

  111. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    No, I'm saying that when Redditors visit a link and post in the comments section: 'hurr reddit was here' and such like, it just degrades the reputation of both sites and makes them look like they're 11 years old.

  112. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    No, I'm saying that when Redditors visit a link and post in the comments section: 'hurr reddit was here' and such like, it just degrades the reputation of both sites and makes them look like they're 11 years old.

  113. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    No, I'm saying that when Redditors visit a link and post in the comments section: 'hurr reddit was here' and such like, it just degrades the reputation of both sites and makes them look like they're 11 years old.

  114. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    No, I'm saying that when Redditors visit a link and post in the comments section: 'hurr reddit was here' and such like, it just degrades the reputation of both sites and makes them look like they're 11 years old.

  115. Josh Schulenberg
    Sep 6, 2012

    Exactly. Stan and Kyle seem to represent the show's creators and are generally pretty normal while everyone else goes between extremes of crazy. This Scientology trash incident would probably fit right in.

  116. Josh Schulenberg
    Sep 6, 2012

    Exactly. Stan and Kyle seem to represent the shows creators and are generally pretty normal while everyone else goes between extremes of crazy. This Scientology trash incident would probably fit right in.

  117. Maybe they are scientologists!

  118. Maybe they are scientologists!

  119. Maybe they are scientologists!

  120. Maybe they are scientologists!

  121. Maybe they are scientologists!

  122. Maybe they are scientologists!

  123. Maybe they are scientologists!

  124. Maybe they are scientologists!

  125. Maybe they are scientologists!

  126. Maybe they are scientologists!

  127. Maybe they are scientologists!

  128. Maybe they are scientologists!

  129. Maybe they are scientologists!

  130. Maybe they are scientologists!

  131. Maybe they are scientologists!

  132. Maybe they are scientologists!

  133. Bo Young In
    Sep 6, 2012

    still pretty harsh to blame the man for the wrong of this world… lol

  134. Trey and Matt are the genius satirists of our age (along with Jennifer Saunders of Ab-Fab) – the best since the Pythons of the 60s/70s… duel with them at your peril.

  135. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    It's a deplorable act, one that annoys most people quite a lot.

  136. Trolling is a art.

  137. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    Don't make me laugh, it's not trolling, it's being a boisterous twat.

  138. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    Don't make me laugh, it's not trolling, it's being a boisterous twat.

  139. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    Don't make me laugh, it's not trolling, it's being a boisterous twat.

  140. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    Don't make me laugh, it's not trolling, it's being a boisterous twat.

  141. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    Don't make me laugh, it's not trolling, it's being a boisterous twat.

  142. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    Don't make me laugh, it's not trolling, it's being a boisterous twat.

  143. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    Don't make me laugh, it's not trolling, it's being a boisterous twat.

  144. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    Don't make me laugh, it's not trolling, it's being a boisterous twat.

  145. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    Don't make me laugh, it's not trolling, it's being a boisterous twat.

  146. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    Don't make me laugh, it's not trolling, it's being a boisterous twat.

  147. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    Don't make me laugh, it's not trolling, it's being a boisterous twat.

  148. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    Don't make me laugh, it's not trolling, it's being a boisterous twat.

  149. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    Don't make me laugh, it's not trolling, it's being a boisterous twat.

  150. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    Don't make me laugh, it's not trolling, it's being a boisterous twat.

  151. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    Don't make me laugh, it's not trolling, it's being a boisterous twat.

  152. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    Don't make me laugh, it's not trolling, it's being a boisterous twat.

  153. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    Don't make me laugh, it's not trolling, it's being a boisterous twat.

  154. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    Don't make me laugh, it's not trolling, it's being a boisterous twat.

  155. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    Don't make me laugh, it's not trolling, it's being a boisterous twat.

  156. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    Don't make me laugh, it's not trolling, it's being a boisterous twat.

  157. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    Don't make me laugh, it's not trolling, it's being a boisterous twat.

  158. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    Don't make me laugh, it's not trolling, it's being a boisterous twat.

  159. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    Don't make me laugh, it's not trolling, it's being a boisterous twat.

  160. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    Don't make me laugh, it's not trolling, it's being a boisterous twat.

  161. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    Don't make me laugh, it's not trolling, it's being a boisterous twat.

  162. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    Don't make me laugh, it's not trolling, it's being a boisterous twat.

  163. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    Don't make me laugh, it's not trolling, it's being a boisterous twat.

  164. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    Don't make me laugh, it's not trolling, it's being a boisterous twat.

  165. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    Don't make me laugh, it's not trolling, it's being a boisterous twat.

  166. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    Don't make me laugh, it's not trolling, it's being a boisterous twat.

  167. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    Don't make me laugh, it's not trolling, it's being a boisterous twat.

  168. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    Don't make me laugh, it's not trolling, it's being a boisterous twat.

  169. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    Don't make me laugh, it's not trolling, it's being a boisterous twat.

  170. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    Don't make me laugh, it's not trolling, it's being a boisterous twat.

  171. lol u mad

  172. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    Haha, what a good one. So inventive! You really hit the nail on the head with that one.

  173. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    Haha, what a good one. So inventive! You really hit the nail on the head with that one.

  174. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    Haha, what a good one. So inventive! You really hit the nail on the head with that one.

  175. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    Haha, what a good one. So inventive! You really hit the nail on the head with that one.

  176. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    Haha, what a good one. So inventive! You really hit the nail on the head with that one.

  177. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    Haha, what a good one. So inventive! You really hit the nail on the head with that one.

  178. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    Haha, what a good one. So inventive! You really hit the nail on the head with that one.

  179. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    Haha, what a good one. So inventive! You really hit the nail on the head with that one.

  180. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    Haha, what a good one. So inventive! You really hit the nail on the head with that one.

  181. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    Haha, what a good one. So inventive! You really hit the nail on the head with that one.

  182. ಠ_ಠ

  183. ಠ_ಠ

  184. ಠ_ಠ

  185. ಠ_ಠ

  186. ಠ_ಠ

  187. ಠ_ಠ

  188. ಠ_ಠ

  189. ಠ_ಠ

  190. ಠ_ಠ

  191. ಠ_ಠ

  192. I wouldn't like that, babies make terrible rubber. Babies are only really good for eating.

  193. I wouldn't like that, babies make terrible rubber. Babies are only really good for eating.

  194. I wouldn't like that, babies make terrible rubber. Babies are only really good for eating.

  195. I wouldn't like that, babies make terrible rubber. Babies are only really good for eating.

  196. I wouldn't like that, babies make terrible rubber. Babies are only really good for eating.

  197. I wouldn't like that, babies make terrible rubber. Babies are only really good for eating.

  198. I wouldn't like that, babies make terrible rubber. Babies are only really good for eating.

  199. I wouldn't like that, babies make terrible rubber. Babies are only really good for eating.

  200. I wouldn't like that, babies make terrible rubber. Babies are only really good for eating.

  201. I wouldn't like that, babies make terrible rubber. Babies are only really good for eating.

  202. Anthony Gatto
    Sep 6, 2012

    unless they are crack babies, then they can join the Crack Baby Athletic Association!!!

  203. Adam Stackpole
    Sep 6, 2012

    ^Gabby is a girls name though….

  204. Tyler- Wait, you don't have Babyskin car tires? You don't know what you're missing out on!

  205. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    No, it's not. Gabrielle is a girls name, my full name is Gabriel. Since it's a fairly long name, I usually shorten it to Gabby. I don't know about the shortening of Gabrielle, but it's probably Unisex.

  206. Adam Stackpole
    Sep 6, 2012

    Interesting, and thank you for the reply. I've never met a man who believed Gabby was in fact a unisex shortening of the male Gabriel but I'll take it, especially since I've met guys named Mackenzie and Sarah which is a decent bit further on the scale.

    But in all seriousness, maybe we should stop wasting our time throwing around names in a completely useless and obscure internet thread? I think its pretty lofty to assume that majority of people even care that someone posts comments like "lol reddit" beyond the fact that they are annoyed enough to call someone a "boisterous twat", and to assume that the problems of the world are hinged on one person. You're probably younger so I'll fill you in on a little fact. Its rude and ignorant to throw around words like that for no reason and to incite an argument based on your false assumptions about something. Next time maybe you should just stick to reading the article and not bother commenting on something just for the sake of being contentions.

    Thats my 2 cents. Hope everyone has a nice day! Cheers.

  207. Adam Stackpole
    Sep 6, 2012

    Interesting, and thank you for the reply. I've never met a man who believed Gabby was in fact a unisex shortening of the male Gabriel but I'll take it, especially since I've met guys named Mackenzie and Sarah which is a decent bit further on the scale.

    But in all seriousness, maybe we should stop wasting our time throwing around names in a completely useless and obscure internet thread? I think its pretty lofty to assume that majority of people even care that someone posts comments like "lol reddit" beyond the fact that they are annoyed enough to call someone a "boisterous twat", and to assume that the problems of the world are hinged on one person. You're probably younger so I'll fill you in on a little fact. Its rude and ignorant to throw around words like that for no reason and to incite an argument based on your false assumptions about something. Next time maybe you should just stick to reading the article and not bother commenting on something just for the sake of being contentions.

    Thats my 2 cents. Hope everyone has a nice day! Cheers.

  208. Adam Stackpole
    Sep 6, 2012

    Interesting, and thank you for the reply. I've never met a man who believed Gabby was in fact a unisex shortening of the male Gabriel but I'll take it, especially since I've met guys named Mackenzie and Sarah which is a decent bit further on the scale.

    But in all seriousness, maybe we should stop wasting our time throwing around names in a completely useless and obscure internet thread? I think its pretty lofty to assume that majority of people even care that someone posts comments like "lol reddit" beyond the fact that they are annoyed enough to call someone a "boisterous twat", and to assume that the problems of the world are hinged on one person. You're probably younger so I'll fill you in on a little fact. Its rude and ignorant to throw around words like that for no reason and to incite an argument based on your false assumptions about something. Next time maybe you should just stick to reading the article and not bother commenting on something just for the sake of being contentions.

    Thats my 2 cents. Hope everyone has a nice day! Cheers.

  209. Adam Stackpole
    Sep 6, 2012

    Interesting, and thank you for the reply. I've never met a man who believed Gabby was in fact a unisex shortening of the male Gabriel but I'll take it, especially since I've met guys named Mackenzie and Sarah which is a decent bit further on the scale.

    But in all seriousness, maybe we should stop wasting our time throwing around names in a completely useless and obscure internet thread? I think its pretty lofty to assume that majority of people even care that someone posts comments like "lol reddit" beyond the fact that they are annoyed enough to call someone a "boisterous twat", and to assume that the problems of the world are hinged on one person. You're probably younger so I'll fill you in on a little fact. Its rude and ignorant to throw around words like that for no reason and to incite an argument based on your false assumptions about something. Next time maybe you should just stick to reading the article and not bother commenting on something just for the sake of being contentions.

    Thats my 2 cents. Hope everyone has a nice day! Cheers.

  210. Adam Stackpole
    Sep 6, 2012

    Interesting, and thank you for the reply. I've never met a man who believed Gabby was in fact a unisex shortening of the male Gabriel but I'll take it, especially since I've met guys named Mackenzie and Sarah which is a decent bit further on the scale.

    But in all seriousness, maybe we should stop wasting our time throwing around names in a completely useless and obscure internet thread? I think its pretty lofty to assume that majority of people even care that someone posts comments like "lol reddit" beyond the fact that they are annoyed enough to call someone a "boisterous twat", and to assume that the problems of the world are hinged on one person. You're probably younger so I'll fill you in on a little fact. Its rude and ignorant to throw around words like that for no reason and to incite an argument based on your false assumptions about something. Next time maybe you should just stick to reading the article and not bother commenting on something just for the sake of being contentions.

    Thats my 2 cents. Hope everyone has a nice day! Cheers.

  211. Adam Stackpole
    Sep 6, 2012

    Interesting, and thank you for the reply. I've never met a man who believed Gabby was in fact a unisex shortening of the male Gabriel but I'll take it, especially since I've met guys named Mackenzie and Sarah which is a decent bit further on the scale.

    But in all seriousness, maybe we should stop wasting our time throwing around names in a completely useless and obscure internet thread? I think its pretty lofty to assume that majority of people even care that someone posts comments like "lol reddit" beyond the fact that they are annoyed enough to call someone a "boisterous twat", and to assume that the problems of the world are hinged on one person. You're probably younger so I'll fill you in on a little fact. Its rude and ignorant to throw around words like that for no reason and to incite an argument based on your false assumptions about something. Next time maybe you should just stick to reading the article and not bother commenting on something just for the sake of being contentions.

    Thats my 2 cents. Hope everyone has a nice day! Cheers.

  212. Adam Stackpole
    Sep 6, 2012

    Interesting, and thank you for the reply. I've never met a man who believed Gabby was in fact a unisex shortening of the male Gabriel but I'll take it, especially since I've met guys named Mackenzie and Sarah which is a decent bit further on the scale.

    But in all seriousness, maybe we should stop wasting our time throwing around names in a completely useless and obscure internet thread? I think its pretty lofty to assume that majority of people even care that someone posts comments like "lol reddit" beyond the fact that they are annoyed enough to call someone a "boisterous twat", and to assume that the problems of the world are hinged on one person. You're probably younger so I'll fill you in on a little fact. Its rude and ignorant to throw around words like that for no reason and to incite an argument based on your false assumptions about something. Next time maybe you should just stick to reading the article and not bother commenting on something just for the sake of being contentions.

    Thats my 2 cents. Hope everyone has a nice day! Cheers.

  213. Adam Stackpole
    Sep 6, 2012

    Interesting, and thank you for the reply. I've never met a man who believed Gabby was in fact a unisex shortening of the male Gabriel but I'll take it, especially since I've met guys named Mackenzie and Sarah which is a decent bit further on the scale.

    But in all seriousness, maybe we should stop wasting our time throwing around names in a completely useless and obscure internet thread? I think its pretty lofty to assume that majority of people even care that someone posts comments like "lol reddit" beyond the fact that they are annoyed enough to call someone a "boisterous twat", and to assume that the problems of the world are hinged on one person. You're probably younger so I'll fill you in on a little fact. Its rude and ignorant to throw around words like that for no reason and to incite an argument based on your false assumptions about something. Next time maybe you should just stick to reading the article and not bother commenting on something just for the sake of being contentions.

    Thats my 2 cents. Hope everyone has a nice day! Cheers.

  214. Adam Stackpole
    Sep 6, 2012

    Interesting, and thank you for the reply. I've never met a man who believed Gabby was in fact a unisex shortening of the male Gabriel but I'll take it, especially since I've met guys named Mackenzie and Sarah which is a decent bit further on the scale.

    But in all seriousness, maybe we should stop wasting our time throwing around names in a completely useless and obscure internet thread? I think its pretty lofty to assume that majority of people even care that someone posts comments like "lol reddit" beyond the fact that they are annoyed enough to call someone a "boisterous twat", and to assume that the problems of the world are hinged on one person. You're probably younger so I'll fill you in on a little fact. Its rude and ignorant to throw around words like that for no reason and to incite an argument based on your false assumptions about something. Next time maybe you should just stick to reading the article and not bother commenting on something just for the sake of being contentions.

    Thats my 2 cents. Hope everyone has a nice day! Cheers.

  215. Adam Stackpole
    Sep 6, 2012

    Interesting, and thank you for the reply. I've never met a man who believed Gabby was in fact a unisex shortening of the male Gabriel but I'll take it, especially since I've met guys named Mackenzie and Sarah which is a decent bit further on the scale.

    But in all seriousness, maybe we should stop wasting our time throwing around names in a completely useless and obscure internet thread? I think its pretty lofty to assume that majority of people even care that someone posts comments like "lol reddit" beyond the fact that they are annoyed enough to call someone a "boisterous twat", and to assume that the problems of the world are hinged on one person. You're probably younger so I'll fill you in on a little fact. Its rude and ignorant to throw around words like that for no reason and to incite an argument based on your false assumptions about something. Next time maybe you should just stick to reading the article and not bother commenting on something just for the sake of being contentions.

    Thats my 2 cents. Hope everyone has a nice day! Cheers.

  216. Adam Stackpole
    Sep 6, 2012

    Interesting, and thank you for the reply. I've never met a man who believed Gabby was in fact a unisex shortening of the male Gabriel but I'll take it, especially since I've met guys named Mackenzie and Sarah which is a decent bit further on the scale.

    But in all seriousness, maybe we should stop wasting our time throwing around names in a completely useless and obscure internet thread? I think its pretty lofty to assume that majority of people even care that someone posts comments like "lol reddit" beyond the fact that they are annoyed enough to call someone a "boisterous twat", and to assume that the problems of the world are hinged on one person. You're probably younger so I'll fill you in on a little fact. Its rude and ignorant to throw around words like that for no reason and to incite an argument based on your false assumptions about something. Next time maybe you should just stick to reading the article and not bother commenting on something just for the sake of being contentions.

    Thats my 2 cents. Hope everyone has a nice day! Cheers.

  217. Adam Stackpole
    Sep 6, 2012

    Interesting, and thank you for the reply. I've never met a man who believed Gabby was in fact a unisex shortening of the male Gabriel but I'll take it, especially since I've met guys named Mackenzie and Sarah which is a decent bit further on the scale.

    But in all seriousness, maybe we should stop wasting our time throwing around names in a completely useless and obscure internet thread? I think its pretty lofty to assume that majority of people even care that someone posts comments like "lol reddit" beyond the fact that they are annoyed enough to call someone a "boisterous twat", and to assume that the problems of the world are hinged on one person. You're probably younger so I'll fill you in on a little fact. Its rude and ignorant to throw around words like that for no reason and to incite an argument based on your false assumptions about something. Next time maybe you should just stick to reading the article and not bother commenting on something just for the sake of being contentions.

    Thats my 2 cents. Hope everyone has a nice day! Cheers.

  218. Adam Stackpole
    Sep 6, 2012

    Interesting, and thank you for the reply. I've never met a man who believed Gabby was in fact a unisex shortening of the male Gabriel but I'll take it, especially since I've met guys named Mackenzie and Sarah which is a decent bit further on the scale.

    But in all seriousness, maybe we should stop wasting our time throwing around names in a completely useless and obscure internet thread? I think its pretty lofty to assume that majority of people even care that someone posts comments like "lol reddit" beyond the fact that they are annoyed enough to call someone a "boisterous twat", and to assume that the problems of the world are hinged on one person. You're probably younger so I'll fill you in on a little fact. Its rude and ignorant to throw around words like that for no reason and to incite an argument based on your false assumptions about something. Next time maybe you should just stick to reading the article and not bother commenting on something just for the sake of being contentions.

    Thats my 2 cents. Hope everyone has a nice day! Cheers.

  219. Adam Stackpole
    Sep 6, 2012

    Interesting, and thank you for the reply. I've never met a man who believed Gabby was in fact a unisex shortening of the male Gabriel but I'll take it, especially since I've met guys named Mackenzie and Sarah which is a decent bit further on the scale.

    But in all seriousness, maybe we should stop wasting our time throwing around names in a completely useless and obscure internet thread? I think its pretty lofty to assume that majority of people even care that someone posts comments like "lol reddit" beyond the fact that they are annoyed enough to call someone a "boisterous twat", and to assume that the problems of the world are hinged on one person. You're probably younger so I'll fill you in on a little fact. Its rude and ignorant to throw around words like that for no reason and to incite an argument based on your false assumptions about something. Next time maybe you should just stick to reading the article and not bother commenting on something just for the sake of being contentions.

    Thats my 2 cents. Hope everyone has a nice day! Cheers.

  220. Adam Stackpole
    Sep 6, 2012

    Interesting, and thank you for the reply. I've never met a man who believed Gabby was in fact a unisex shortening of the male Gabriel but I'll take it, especially since I've met guys named Mackenzie and Sarah which is a decent bit further on the scale.

    But in all seriousness, maybe we should stop wasting our time throwing around names in a completely useless and obscure internet thread? I think its pretty lofty to assume that majority of people even care that someone posts comments like "lol reddit" beyond the fact that they are annoyed enough to call someone a "boisterous twat", and to assume that the problems of the world are hinged on one person. You're probably younger so I'll fill you in on a little fact. Its rude and ignorant to throw around words like that for no reason and to incite an argument based on your false assumptions about something. Next time maybe you should just stick to reading the article and not bother commenting on something just for the sake of being contentions.

    Thats my 2 cents. Hope everyone has a nice day! Cheers.

  221. Adam Stackpole
    Sep 6, 2012

    Interesting, and thank you for the reply. I've never met a man who believed Gabby was in fact a unisex shortening of the male Gabriel but I'll take it, especially since I've met guys named Mackenzie and Sarah which is a decent bit further on the scale.

    But in all seriousness, maybe we should stop wasting our time throwing around names in a completely useless and obscure internet thread? I think its pretty lofty to assume that majority of people even care that someone posts comments like "lol reddit" beyond the fact that they are annoyed enough to call someone a "boisterous twat", and to assume that the problems of the world are hinged on one person. You're probably younger so I'll fill you in on a little fact. Its rude and ignorant to throw around words like that for no reason and to incite an argument based on your false assumptions about something. Next time maybe you should just stick to reading the article and not bother commenting on something just for the sake of being contentions.

    Thats my 2 cents. Hope everyone has a nice day! Cheers.

  222. Adam Stackpole
    Sep 6, 2012

    Interesting, and thank you for the reply. I've never met a man who believed Gabby was in fact a unisex shortening of the male Gabriel but I'll take it, especially since I've met guys named Mackenzie and Sarah which is a decent bit further on the scale.

    But in all seriousness, maybe we should stop wasting our time throwing around names in a completely useless and obscure internet thread? I think its pretty lofty to assume that majority of people even care that someone posts comments like "lol reddit" beyond the fact that they are annoyed enough to call someone a "boisterous twat", and to assume that the problems of the world are hinged on one person. You're probably younger so I'll fill you in on a little fact. Its rude and ignorant to throw around words like that for no reason and to incite an argument based on your false assumptions about something. Next time maybe you should just stick to reading the article and not bother commenting on something just for the sake of being contentions.

    Thats my 2 cents. Hope everyone has a nice day! Cheers.

  223. Adam Stackpole
    Sep 6, 2012

    Interesting, and thank you for the reply. I've never met a man who believed Gabby was in fact a unisex shortening of the male Gabriel but I'll take it, especially since I've met guys named Mackenzie and Sarah which is a decent bit further on the scale.

    But in all seriousness, maybe we should stop wasting our time throwing around names in a completely useless and obscure internet thread? I think its pretty lofty to assume that majority of people even care that someone posts comments like "lol reddit" beyond the fact that they are annoyed enough to call someone a "boisterous twat", and to assume that the problems of the world are hinged on one person. You're probably younger so I'll fill you in on a little fact. Its rude and ignorant to throw around words like that for no reason and to incite an argument based on your false assumptions about something. Next time maybe you should just stick to reading the article and not bother commenting on something just for the sake of being contentions.

    Thats my 2 cents. Hope everyone has a nice day! Cheers.

  224. Adam Stackpole
    Sep 6, 2012

    Interesting, and thank you for the reply. I've never met a man who believed Gabby was in fact a unisex shortening of the male Gabriel but I'll take it, especially since I've met guys named Mackenzie and Sarah which is a decent bit further on the scale.

    But in all seriousness, maybe we should stop wasting our time throwing around names in a completely useless and obscure internet thread? I think its pretty lofty to assume that majority of people even care that someone posts comments like "lol reddit" beyond the fact that they are annoyed enough to call someone a "boisterous twat", and to assume that the problems of the world are hinged on one person. You're probably younger so I'll fill you in on a little fact. Its rude and ignorant to throw around words like that for no reason and to incite an argument based on your false assumptions about something. Next time maybe you should just stick to reading the article and not bother commenting on something just for the sake of being contentions.

    Thats my 2 cents. Hope everyone has a nice day! Cheers.

  225. Adam Stackpole
    Sep 6, 2012

    Interesting, and thank you for the reply. I've never met a man who believed Gabby was in fact a unisex shortening of the male Gabriel but I'll take it, especially since I've met guys named Mackenzie and Sarah which is a decent bit further on the scale.

    But in all seriousness, maybe we should stop wasting our time throwing around names in a completely useless and obscure internet thread? I think its pretty lofty to assume that majority of people even care that someone posts comments like "lol reddit" beyond the fact that they are annoyed enough to call someone a "boisterous twat", and to assume that the problems of the world are hinged on one person. You're probably younger so I'll fill you in on a little fact. Its rude and ignorant to throw around words like that for no reason and to incite an argument based on your false assumptions about something. Next time maybe you should just stick to reading the article and not bother commenting on something just for the sake of being contentions.

    Thats my 2 cents. Hope everyone has a nice day! Cheers.

  226. Adam Stackpole
    Sep 6, 2012

    Interesting, and thank you for the reply. I've never met a man who believed Gabby was in fact a unisex shortening of the male Gabriel but I'll take it, especially since I've met guys named Mackenzie and Sarah which is a decent bit further on the scale.

    But in all seriousness, maybe we should stop wasting our time throwing around names in a completely useless and obscure internet thread? I think its pretty lofty to assume that majority of people even care that someone posts comments like "lol reddit" beyond the fact that they are annoyed enough to call someone a "boisterous twat", and to assume that the problems of the world are hinged on one person. You're probably younger so I'll fill you in on a little fact. Its rude and ignorant to throw around words like that for no reason and to incite an argument based on your false assumptions about something. Next time maybe you should just stick to reading the article and not bother commenting on something just for the sake of being contentions.

    Thats my 2 cents. Hope everyone has a nice day! Cheers.

  227. Adam Stackpole
    Sep 6, 2012

    Interesting, and thank you for the reply. I've never met a man who believed Gabby was in fact a unisex shortening of the male Gabriel but I'll take it, especially since I've met guys named Mackenzie and Sarah which is a decent bit further on the scale.

    But in all seriousness, maybe we should stop wasting our time throwing around names in a completely useless and obscure internet thread? I think its pretty lofty to assume that majority of people even care that someone posts comments like "lol reddit" beyond the fact that they are annoyed enough to call someone a "boisterous twat", and to assume that the problems of the world are hinged on one person. You're probably younger so I'll fill you in on a little fact. Its rude and ignorant to throw around words like that for no reason and to incite an argument based on your false assumptions about something. Next time maybe you should just stick to reading the article and not bother commenting on something just for the sake of being contentions.

    Thats my 2 cents. Hope everyone has a nice day! Cheers.

  228. Adam Stackpole
    Sep 6, 2012

    Interesting, and thank you for the reply. I've never met a man who believed Gabby was in fact a unisex shortening of the male Gabriel but I'll take it, especially since I've met guys named Mackenzie and Sarah which is a decent bit further on the scale.

    But in all seriousness, maybe we should stop wasting our time throwing around names in a completely useless and obscure internet thread? I think its pretty lofty to assume that majority of people even care that someone posts comments like "lol reddit" beyond the fact that they are annoyed enough to call someone a "boisterous twat", and to assume that the problems of the world are hinged on one person. You're probably younger so I'll fill you in on a little fact. Its rude and ignorant to throw around words like that for no reason and to incite an argument based on your false assumptions about something. Next time maybe you should just stick to reading the article and not bother commenting on something just for the sake of being contentions.

    Thats my 2 cents. Hope everyone has a nice day! Cheers.

  229. Adam Stackpole
    Sep 6, 2012

    Interesting, and thank you for the reply. I've never met a man who believed Gabby was in fact a unisex shortening of the male Gabriel but I'll take it, especially since I've met guys named Mackenzie and Sarah which is a decent bit further on the scale.

    But in all seriousness, maybe we should stop wasting our time throwing around names in a completely useless and obscure internet thread? I think its pretty lofty to assume that majority of people even care that someone posts comments like "lol reddit" beyond the fact that they are annoyed enough to call someone a "boisterous twat", and to assume that the problems of the world are hinged on one person. You're probably younger so I'll fill you in on a little fact. Its rude and ignorant to throw around words like that for no reason and to incite an argument based on your false assumptions about something. Next time maybe you should just stick to reading the article and not bother commenting on something just for the sake of being contentions.

    Thats my 2 cents. Hope everyone has a nice day! Cheers.

  230. Adam Stackpole
    Sep 6, 2012

    Interesting, and thank you for the reply. I've never met a man who believed Gabby was in fact a unisex shortening of the male Gabriel but I'll take it, especially since I've met guys named Mackenzie and Sarah which is a decent bit further on the scale.

    But in all seriousness, maybe we should stop wasting our time throwing around names in a completely useless and obscure internet thread? I think its pretty lofty to assume that majority of people even care that someone posts comments like "lol reddit" beyond the fact that they are annoyed enough to call someone a "boisterous twat", and to assume that the problems of the world are hinged on one person. You're probably younger so I'll fill you in on a little fact. Its rude and ignorant to throw around words like that for no reason and to incite an argument based on your false assumptions about something. Next time maybe you should just stick to reading the article and not bother commenting on something just for the sake of being contentions.

    Thats my 2 cents. Hope everyone has a nice day! Cheers.

  231. Adam Stackpole
    Sep 6, 2012

    Interesting, and thank you for the reply. I've never met a man who believed Gabby was in fact a unisex shortening of the male Gabriel but I'll take it, especially since I've met guys named Mackenzie and Sarah which is a decent bit further on the scale.

    But in all seriousness, maybe we should stop wasting our time throwing around names in a completely useless and obscure internet thread? I think its pretty lofty to assume that majority of people even care that someone posts comments like "lol reddit" beyond the fact that they are annoyed enough to call someone a "boisterous twat", and to assume that the problems of the world are hinged on one person. You're probably younger so I'll fill you in on a little fact. Its rude and ignorant to throw around words like that for no reason and to incite an argument based on your false assumptions about something. Next time maybe you should just stick to reading the article and not bother commenting on something just for the sake of being contentions.

    Thats my 2 cents. Hope everyone has a nice day! Cheers.

  232. Adam Stackpole
    Sep 6, 2012

    Interesting, and thank you for the reply. I've never met a man who believed Gabby was in fact a unisex shortening of the male Gabriel but I'll take it, especially since I've met guys named Mackenzie and Sarah which is a decent bit further on the scale.

    But in all seriousness, maybe we should stop wasting our time throwing around names in a completely useless and obscure internet thread? I think its pretty lofty to assume that majority of people even care that someone posts comments like "lol reddit" beyond the fact that they are annoyed enough to call someone a "boisterous twat", and to assume that the problems of the world are hinged on one person. You're probably younger so I'll fill you in on a little fact. Its rude and ignorant to throw around words like that for no reason and to incite an argument based on your false assumptions about something. Next time maybe you should just stick to reading the article and not bother commenting on something just for the sake of being contentions.

    Thats my 2 cents. Hope everyone has a nice day! Cheers.

  233. Adam Stackpole
    Sep 6, 2012

    Interesting, and thank you for the reply. I've never met a man who believed Gabby was in fact a unisex shortening of the male Gabriel but I'll take it, especially since I've met guys named Mackenzie and Sarah which is a decent bit further on the scale.

    But in all seriousness, maybe we should stop wasting our time throwing around names in a completely useless and obscure internet thread? I think its pretty lofty to assume that majority of people even care that someone posts comments like "lol reddit" beyond the fact that they are annoyed enough to call someone a "boisterous twat", and to assume that the problems of the world are hinged on one person. You're probably younger so I'll fill you in on a little fact. Its rude and ignorant to throw around words like that for no reason and to incite an argument based on your false assumptions about something. Next time maybe you should just stick to reading the article and not bother commenting on something just for the sake of being contentions.

    Thats my 2 cents. Hope everyone has a nice day! Cheers.

  234. Adam Stackpole
    Sep 6, 2012

    Interesting, and thank you for the reply. I've never met a man who believed Gabby was in fact a unisex shortening of the male Gabriel but I'll take it, especially since I've met guys named Mackenzie and Sarah which is a decent bit further on the scale.

    But in all seriousness, maybe we should stop wasting our time throwing around names in a completely useless and obscure internet thread? I think its pretty lofty to assume that majority of people even care that someone posts comments like "lol reddit" beyond the fact that they are annoyed enough to call someone a "boisterous twat", and to assume that the problems of the world are hinged on one person. You're probably younger so I'll fill you in on a little fact. Its rude and ignorant to throw around words like that for no reason and to incite an argument based on your false assumptions about something. Next time maybe you should just stick to reading the article and not bother commenting on something just for the sake of being contentions.

    Thats my 2 cents. Hope everyone has a nice day! Cheers.

  235. Adam Stackpole
    Sep 6, 2012

    Interesting, and thank you for the reply. I've never met a man who believed Gabby was in fact a unisex shortening of the male Gabriel but I'll take it, especially since I've met guys named Mackenzie and Sarah which is a decent bit further on the scale.

    But in all seriousness, maybe we should stop wasting our time throwing around names in a completely useless and obscure internet thread? I think its pretty lofty to assume that majority of people even care that someone posts comments like "lol reddit" beyond the fact that they are annoyed enough to call someone a "boisterous twat", and to assume that the problems of the world are hinged on one person. You're probably younger so I'll fill you in on a little fact. Its rude and ignorant to throw around words like that for no reason and to incite an argument based on your false assumptions about something. Next time maybe you should just stick to reading the article and not bother commenting on something just for the sake of being contentions.

    Thats my 2 cents. Hope everyone has a nice day! Cheers.

  236. Adam Stackpole
    Sep 6, 2012

    Interesting, and thank you for the reply. I've never met a man who believed Gabby was in fact a unisex shortening of the male Gabriel but I'll take it, especially since I've met guys named Mackenzie and Sarah which is a decent bit further on the scale.

    But in all seriousness, maybe we should stop wasting our time throwing around names in a completely useless and obscure internet thread? I think its pretty lofty to assume that majority of people even care that someone posts comments like "lol reddit" beyond the fact that they are annoyed enough to call someone a "boisterous twat", and to assume that the problems of the world are hinged on one person. You're probably younger so I'll fill you in on a little fact. Its rude and ignorant to throw around words like that for no reason and to incite an argument based on your false assumptions about something. Next time maybe you should just stick to reading the article and not bother commenting on something just for the sake of being contentions.

    Thats my 2 cents. Hope everyone has a nice day! Cheers.

  237. Adam Stackpole
    Sep 6, 2012

    Interesting, and thank you for the reply. I've never met a man who believed Gabby was in fact a unisex shortening of the male Gabriel but I'll take it, especially since I've met guys named Mackenzie and Sarah which is a decent bit further on the scale.

    But in all seriousness, maybe we should stop wasting our time throwing around names in a completely useless and obscure internet thread? I think its pretty lofty to assume that majority of people even care that someone posts comments like "lol reddit" beyond the fact that they are annoyed enough to call someone a "boisterous twat", and to assume that the problems of the world are hinged on one person. You're probably younger so I'll fill you in on a little fact. Its rude and ignorant to throw around words like that for no reason and to incite an argument based on your false assumptions about something. Next time maybe you should just stick to reading the article and not bother commenting on something just for the sake of being contentions.

    Thats my 2 cents. Hope everyone has a nice day! Cheers.

  238. Adam Stackpole
    Sep 6, 2012

    Interesting, and thank you for the reply. I've never met a man who believed Gabby was in fact a unisex shortening of the male Gabriel but I'll take it, especially since I've met guys named Mackenzie and Sarah which is a decent bit further on the scale.

    But in all seriousness, maybe we should stop wasting our time throwing around names in a completely useless and obscure internet thread? I think its pretty lofty to assume that majority of people even care that someone posts comments like "lol reddit" beyond the fact that they are annoyed enough to call someone a "boisterous twat", and to assume that the problems of the world are hinged on one person. You're probably younger so I'll fill you in on a little fact. Its rude and ignorant to throw around words like that for no reason and to incite an argument based on your false assumptions about something. Next time maybe you should just stick to reading the article and not bother commenting on something just for the sake of being contentions.

    Thats my 2 cents. Hope everyone has a nice day! Cheers.

  239. Mark Wevers
    Sep 6, 2012

    Worst movie experience ever. And that was when I was too young to know that movies were crappy.

  240. and this is different from all other religions how?

  241. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    Perhaps. But I'm entitled to my own and opinion and reserve the right to have my say. The RedditFags are not, indeed, a life-threatening problem, but irritating nonetheless. I've spent enough time on the Internet to see that this is not an invalid issue, so it's not a 'false assumption.' It's not rude or ignorant to express your opinion, and I was commenting to combat the tide of moronic infection.

  242. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    Perhaps. But I'm entitled to my own and opinion and reserve the right to have my say. The RedditFags are not, indeed, a life-threatening problem, but irritating nonetheless. I've spent enough time on the Internet to see that this is not an invalid issue, so it's not a 'false assumption.' It's not rude or ignorant to express your opinion, and I was commenting to combat the tide of moronic infection.

  243. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    Perhaps. But I'm entitled to my own and opinion and reserve the right to have my say. The RedditFags are not, indeed, a life-threatening problem, but irritating nonetheless. I've spent enough time on the Internet to see that this is not an invalid issue, so it's not a 'false assumption.' It's not rude or ignorant to express your opinion, and I was commenting to combat the tide of moronic infection.

  244. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    Perhaps. But I'm entitled to my own and opinion and reserve the right to have my say. The RedditFags are not, indeed, a life-threatening problem, but irritating nonetheless. I've spent enough time on the Internet to see that this is not an invalid issue, so it's not a 'false assumption.' It's not rude or ignorant to express your opinion, and I was commenting to combat the tide of moronic infection.

  245. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    Perhaps. But I'm entitled to my own and opinion and reserve the right to have my say. The RedditFags are not, indeed, a life-threatening problem, but irritating nonetheless. I've spent enough time on the Internet to see that this is not an invalid issue, so it's not a 'false assumption.' It's not rude or ignorant to express your opinion, and I was commenting to combat the tide of moronic infection.

  246. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    Perhaps. But I'm entitled to my own and opinion and reserve the right to have my say. The RedditFags are not, indeed, a life-threatening problem, but irritating nonetheless. I've spent enough time on the Internet to see that this is not an invalid issue, so it's not a 'false assumption.' It's not rude or ignorant to express your opinion, and I was commenting to combat the tide of moronic infection.

  247. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    Perhaps. But I'm entitled to my own and opinion and reserve the right to have my say. The RedditFags are not, indeed, a life-threatening problem, but irritating nonetheless. I've spent enough time on the Internet to see that this is not an invalid issue, so it's not a 'false assumption.' It's not rude or ignorant to express your opinion, and I was commenting to combat the tide of moronic infection.

  248. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    Perhaps. But I'm entitled to my own and opinion and reserve the right to have my say. The RedditFags are not, indeed, a life-threatening problem, but irritating nonetheless. I've spent enough time on the Internet to see that this is not an invalid issue, so it's not a 'false assumption.' It's not rude or ignorant to express your opinion, and I was commenting to combat the tide of moronic infection.

  249. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    Perhaps. But I'm entitled to my own and opinion and reserve the right to have my say. The RedditFags are not, indeed, a life-threatening problem, but irritating nonetheless. I've spent enough time on the Internet to see that this is not an invalid issue, so it's not a 'false assumption.' It's not rude or ignorant to express your opinion, and I was commenting to combat the tide of moronic infection.

  250. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    Perhaps. But I'm entitled to my own and opinion and reserve the right to have my say. The RedditFags are not, indeed, a life-threatening problem, but irritating nonetheless. I've spent enough time on the Internet to see that this is not an invalid issue, so it's not a 'false assumption.' It's not rude or ignorant to express your opinion, and I was commenting to combat the tide of moronic infection.

  251. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    Perhaps. But I'm entitled to my own and opinion and reserve the right to have my say. The RedditFags are not, indeed, a life-threatening problem, but irritating nonetheless. I've spent enough time on the Internet to see that this is not an invalid issue, so it's not a 'false assumption.' It's not rude or ignorant to express your opinion, and I was commenting to combat the tide of moronic infection.

  252. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    Perhaps. But I'm entitled to my own and opinion and reserve the right to have my say. The RedditFags are not, indeed, a life-threatening problem, but irritating nonetheless. I've spent enough time on the Internet to see that this is not an invalid issue, so it's not a 'false assumption.' It's not rude or ignorant to express your opinion, and I was commenting to combat the tide of moronic infection.

  253. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    Perhaps. But I'm entitled to my own and opinion and reserve the right to have my say. The RedditFags are not, indeed, a life-threatening problem, but irritating nonetheless. I've spent enough time on the Internet to see that this is not an invalid issue, so it's not a 'false assumption.' It's not rude or ignorant to express your opinion, and I was commenting to combat the tide of moronic infection.

  254. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    Perhaps. But I'm entitled to my own and opinion and reserve the right to have my say. The RedditFags are not, indeed, a life-threatening problem, but irritating nonetheless. I've spent enough time on the Internet to see that this is not an invalid issue, so it's not a 'false assumption.' It's not rude or ignorant to express your opinion, and I was commenting to combat the tide of moronic infection.

  255. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    Perhaps. But I'm entitled to my own and opinion and reserve the right to have my say. The RedditFags are not, indeed, a life-threatening problem, but irritating nonetheless. I've spent enough time on the Internet to see that this is not an invalid issue, so it's not a 'false assumption.' It's not rude or ignorant to express your opinion, and I was commenting to combat the tide of moronic infection.

  256. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    Perhaps. But I'm entitled to my own and opinion and reserve the right to have my say. The RedditFags are not, indeed, a life-threatening problem, but irritating nonetheless. I've spent enough time on the Internet to see that this is not an invalid issue, so it's not a 'false assumption.' It's not rude or ignorant to express your opinion, and I was commenting to combat the tide of moronic infection.

  257. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    Perhaps. But I'm entitled to my own and opinion and reserve the right to have my say. The RedditFags are not, indeed, a life-threatening problem, but irritating nonetheless. I've spent enough time on the Internet to see that this is not an invalid issue, so it's not a 'false assumption.' It's not rude or ignorant to express your opinion, and I was commenting to combat the tide of moronic infection.

  258. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    Perhaps. But I'm entitled to my own and opinion and reserve the right to have my say. The RedditFags are not, indeed, a life-threatening problem, but irritating nonetheless. I've spent enough time on the Internet to see that this is not an invalid issue, so it's not a 'false assumption.' It's not rude or ignorant to express your opinion, and I was commenting to combat the tide of moronic infection.

  259. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    Perhaps. But I'm entitled to my own and opinion and reserve the right to have my say. The RedditFags are not, indeed, a life-threatening problem, but irritating nonetheless. I've spent enough time on the Internet to see that this is not an invalid issue, so it's not a 'false assumption.' It's not rude or ignorant to express your opinion, and I was commenting to combat the tide of moronic infection.

  260. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    Perhaps. But I'm entitled to my own and opinion and reserve the right to have my say. The RedditFags are not, indeed, a life-threatening problem, but irritating nonetheless. I've spent enough time on the Internet to see that this is not an invalid issue, so it's not a 'false assumption.' It's not rude or ignorant to express your opinion, and I was commenting to combat the tide of moronic infection.

  261. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    Perhaps. But I'm entitled to my own and opinion and reserve the right to have my say. The RedditFags are not, indeed, a life-threatening problem, but irritating nonetheless. I've spent enough time on the Internet to see that this is not an invalid issue, so it's not a 'false assumption.' It's not rude or ignorant to express your opinion, and I was commenting to combat the tide of moronic infection.

  262. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    Perhaps. But I'm entitled to my own and opinion and reserve the right to have my say. The RedditFags are not, indeed, a life-threatening problem, but irritating nonetheless. I've spent enough time on the Internet to see that this is not an invalid issue, so it's not a 'false assumption.' It's not rude or ignorant to express your opinion, and I was commenting to combat the tide of moronic infection.

  263. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    Perhaps. But I'm entitled to my own and opinion and reserve the right to have my say. The RedditFags are not, indeed, a life-threatening problem, but irritating nonetheless. I've spent enough time on the Internet to see that this is not an invalid issue, so it's not a 'false assumption.' It's not rude or ignorant to express your opinion, and I was commenting to combat the tide of moronic infection.

  264. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    Perhaps. But I'm entitled to my own and opinion and reserve the right to have my say. The RedditFags are not, indeed, a life-threatening problem, but irritating nonetheless. I've spent enough time on the Internet to see that this is not an invalid issue, so it's not a 'false assumption.' It's not rude or ignorant to express your opinion, and I was commenting to combat the tide of moronic infection.

  265. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    Perhaps. But I'm entitled to my own and opinion and reserve the right to have my say. The RedditFags are not, indeed, a life-threatening problem, but irritating nonetheless. I've spent enough time on the Internet to see that this is not an invalid issue, so it's not a 'false assumption.' It's not rude or ignorant to express your opinion, and I was commenting to combat the tide of moronic infection.

  266. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    Perhaps. But I'm entitled to my own and opinion and reserve the right to have my say. The RedditFags are not, indeed, a life-threatening problem, but irritating nonetheless. I've spent enough time on the Internet to see that this is not an invalid issue, so it's not a 'false assumption.' It's not rude or ignorant to express your opinion, and I was commenting to combat the tide of moronic infection.

  267. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    Perhaps. But I'm entitled to my own and opinion and reserve the right to have my say. The RedditFags are not, indeed, a life-threatening problem, but irritating nonetheless. I've spent enough time on the Internet to see that this is not an invalid issue, so it's not a 'false assumption.' It's not rude or ignorant to express your opinion, and I was commenting to combat the tide of moronic infection.

  268. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    Perhaps. But I'm entitled to my own and opinion and reserve the right to have my say. The RedditFags are not, indeed, a life-threatening problem, but irritating nonetheless. I've spent enough time on the Internet to see that this is not an invalid issue, so it's not a 'false assumption.' It's not rude or ignorant to express your opinion, and I was commenting to combat the tide of moronic infection.

  269. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    Perhaps. But I'm entitled to my own and opinion and reserve the right to have my say. The RedditFags are not, indeed, a life-threatening problem, but irritating nonetheless. I've spent enough time on the Internet to see that this is not an invalid issue, so it's not a 'false assumption.' It's not rude or ignorant to express your opinion, and I was commenting to combat the tide of moronic infection.

  270. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    Perhaps. But I'm entitled to my own and opinion and reserve the right to have my say. The RedditFags are not, indeed, a life-threatening problem, but irritating nonetheless. I've spent enough time on the Internet to see that this is not an invalid issue, so it's not a 'false assumption.' It's not rude or ignorant to express your opinion, and I was commenting to combat the tide of moronic infection.

  271. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    Perhaps. But I'm entitled to my own and opinion and reserve the right to have my say. The RedditFags are not, indeed, a life-threatening problem, but irritating nonetheless. I've spent enough time on the Internet to see that this is not an invalid issue, so it's not a 'false assumption.' It's not rude or ignorant to express your opinion, and I was commenting to combat the tide of moronic infection.

  272. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    Perhaps. But I'm entitled to my own and opinion and reserve the right to have my say. The RedditFags are not, indeed, a life-threatening problem, but irritating nonetheless. I've spent enough time on the Internet to see that this is not an invalid issue, so it's not a 'false assumption.' It's not rude or ignorant to express your opinion, and I was commenting to combat the tide of moronic infection.

  273. Please send Tom over for a good poke…through my garbage

  274. The only reason why this dangerous organization is still designated as a religion by the US government is because they use "Sicilian-style tactics" to prevent the US government from banning them. Since nobody in the government has the courage to stand up to these white-collar criminals, we'll need vigilantes to do the work for us.

  275. Adam Stackpole
    Sep 6, 2012

    That may be true, but your tone and choice of words make you seem like the moronic infection. Just because it's your opinion (no matter how silly it is) doesn't mean you are entitled to inject it in such a rude manner. Perhaps you would like to cite reasons other than your own opinion and apparent "experience" on the internet as to why the "RedditFags" as you call them are irritating enough for you to speak that way about any person?

  276. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    I am entitled to express my opinion in any demeanor I deign, as is the way of Free Speech. The RedditFags that feel the need to advertise their presence on every link, and the manner that they came there from, deteriorate Reddit and it's scene in general.

  277. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    I am entitled to express my opinion in any demeanor I deign, as is the way of Free Speech. The RedditFags that feel the need to advertise their presence on every link, and the manner that they came there from, deteriorate Reddit and it's scene in general.

  278. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    I am entitled to express my opinion in any demeanor I deign, as is the way of Free Speech. The RedditFags that feel the need to advertise their presence on every link, and the manner that they came there from, deteriorate Reddit and it's scene in general.

  279. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    I am entitled to express my opinion in any demeanor I deign, as is the way of Free Speech. The RedditFags that feel the need to advertise their presence on every link, and the manner that they came there from, deteriorate Reddit and it's scene in general.

  280. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    I am entitled to express my opinion in any demeanor I deign, as is the way of Free Speech. The RedditFags that feel the need to advertise their presence on every link, and the manner that they came there from, deteriorate Reddit and it's scene in general.

  281. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    I am entitled to express my opinion in any demeanor I deign, as is the way of Free Speech. The RedditFags that feel the need to advertise their presence on every link, and the manner that they came there from, deteriorate Reddit and it's scene in general.

  282. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    I am entitled to express my opinion in any demeanor I deign, as is the way of Free Speech. The RedditFags that feel the need to advertise their presence on every link, and the manner that they came there from, deteriorate Reddit and it's scene in general.

  283. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    I am entitled to express my opinion in any demeanor I deign, as is the way of Free Speech. The RedditFags that feel the need to advertise their presence on every link, and the manner that they came there from, deteriorate Reddit and it's scene in general.

  284. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    I am entitled to express my opinion in any demeanor I deign, as is the way of Free Speech. The RedditFags that feel the need to advertise their presence on every link, and the manner that they came there from, deteriorate Reddit and it's scene in general.

  285. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    I am entitled to express my opinion in any demeanor I deign, as is the way of Free Speech. The RedditFags that feel the need to advertise their presence on every link, and the manner that they came there from, deteriorate Reddit and it's scene in general.

  286. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    I am entitled to express my opinion in any demeanor I deign, as is the way of Free Speech. The RedditFags that feel the need to advertise their presence on every link, and the manner that they came there from, deteriorate Reddit and it's scene in general.

  287. Adam Stackpole
    Sep 6, 2012

    More incorrect assuptions based on your false conceptions. I am waiting for your empirical evidence, not your misguided opinions. It is sad that people bend the idea of free speech and think it gives them the right to be slanderous without regard. Also, for future reference, your demeanor is a gateway to how you react professionally. I wish you luck when you get into the real world, you're gonna need it.

  288. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    Subtle insults and trying to capture some sort of moral and ethical high ground doesn't get you ahead in an argument, let alone life. So stop. What do you expect me to do? Stockpile every single case of a RedditFag showing their true colours? The brilliant thing about free speech is that everybody can say whatever the fuck they want to say, so if they want to be 'slanderous without regard', they can be. Incorrect assumptions and false conceptions? You only need look at the comment that started this all off, 'lol reddit.'

  289. Adam Stackpole
    Sep 6, 2012

    I seem to be getting ahead just fine, thank you. And yes. In order to come to such a rash conclusion I expect physical evidince providing deductive reasoning behind what seems to be a misguided hatred for an arbitrary group of people. Your ignorance and generalization based on one persons random irrelevant comment are frankly saddening.

  290. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    What a damn shame. What effect does that gave on me, exactly?

  291. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    What a damn shame. What effect does that gave on me, exactly?

  292. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 6, 2012

    What a damn shame. What effect does that gave on me, exactly?

  293. Emory Damn Son Christenson
    Sep 6, 2012

    Considering this article was written last year, I highly doubt it's going to be in the next episode.

  294. Stephanie Orem
    Sep 6, 2012

    I've often though of venturing into one of their 'centers' because I'm a very curious person. I've since decided not to because these people are extremely dangerous. They will file false reports against you, do terrorist acts in your name and get you arrested, and even attempt to turn your friends against you as a way of isolation to potentially make you suicidal. It sounds out there but it's true. Read "Looking over my shoulder" the Paulette Cooper story.

  295. Adam Stackpole
    Sep 6, 2012

    Have*

    Truthfully it has no effect on you. I wish you the best in your future endeavors, and I guess we can 'agree to disagree'. :) Side note, cursing makes you sound like you're an angry teenager. So stop.

  296. Adam Stackpole
    Sep 6, 2012

    Have*

    Truthfully it has no effect on you. I wish you the best in your future endeavors, and I guess we can 'agree to disagree'. :) Side note, cursing makes you sound like you're an angry teenager. So stop.

  297. Adam Stackpole
    Sep 6, 2012

    Have*

    Truthfully it has no effect on you. I wish you the best in your future endeavors, and I guess we can 'agree to disagree'. :) Side note, cursing makes you sound like you're an angry teenager. So stop.

  298. Adam Stackpole
    Sep 6, 2012

    Have*

    Truthfully it has no effect on you. I wish you the best in your future endeavors, and I guess we can 'agree to disagree'. :) Side note, cursing makes you sound like you're an angry teenager. So stop.

  299. Adam Stackpole
    Sep 6, 2012

    Have*

    Truthfully it has no effect on you. I wish you the best in your future endeavors, and I guess we can 'agree to disagree'. :) Side note, cursing makes you sound like you're an angry teenager. So stop.

  300. Adam Stackpole
    Sep 6, 2012

    Have*

    Truthfully it has no effect on you. I wish you the best in your future endeavors, and I guess we can 'agree to disagree'. :) Side note, cursing makes you sound like you're an angry teenager. So stop.

  301. Anonymous
    Sep 6, 2012

    Learn how to make money just using the Google. You choose working hours. Earning potential up to $2000/day. For more info visit MakeCash25.cøm.

  302. The only way to ruin these 2 guys…., if they are somehow proven to be normal. Hey, look at their picture. Don't they look normal? Well, they are probably not wearing pants or undies, but what would that really prove? Besides not spending money on half a wardrobe……

  303. I think there is some #'s thing… If you have enough idiots believing in it you qualify for a religion, until then just a cult.

  304. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 7, 2012

    I shall do whatever the fuck I like.

  305. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 7, 2012

    I shall do whatever the fuck I like.

  306. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 7, 2012

    I shall do whatever the fuck I like.

  307. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 7, 2012

    I shall do whatever the fuck I like.

  308. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 7, 2012

    I shall do whatever the fuck I like.

  309. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 7, 2012

    I shall do whatever the fuck I like.

  310. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 7, 2012

    I shall do whatever the fuck I like.

  311. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 7, 2012

    I shall do whatever the fuck I like.

  312. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 7, 2012

    I shall do whatever the fuck I like.

  313. Gabby Newmeir
    Sep 7, 2012

    I shall do whatever the fuck I like.

  314. Adam Stackpole
    Sep 7, 2012

    Lol ok

  315. Adam Stackpole
    Sep 7, 2012

    Lol ok

  316. Adam Stackpole
    Sep 7, 2012

    Lol ok

  317. Adam Stackpole
    Sep 7, 2012

    Lol ok

  318. Adam Stackpole
    Sep 7, 2012

    Lol ok

  319. Adam Stackpole
    Sep 7, 2012

    Lol ok

  320. Adam Stackpole
    Sep 7, 2012

    Lol ok

  321. Adam Stackpole
    Sep 7, 2012

    Lol ok

  322. Adam Stackpole
    Sep 7, 2012

    Lol ok

  323. Adam Stackpole
    Sep 7, 2012

    Lol ok

  324. Anonymous
    Sep 7, 2012

    >>>>> My friend's mom makes $69/hr on the computer. She has been laid off for 6 months but last month her check with bonuses was $18267 just working on the computer for a few hours. Read more here >>>> http://tinyurl.com/9723rav

  325. Craig Popkess
    Sep 7, 2012

    All of them are cults: this one is just a bit sillier than the mormons and the astrologers… None of them deserve tax-free subsidies.

  326. lol facebook

  327. maybe the Scientologist plan has already sprung. The last season of South Park has been the most docile in memory. Can anyone think of anything controversial that they have said/done in Season 16?