Inquisitr NewsInquisitr NewsInquisitr News
  • News
  • Celebrity
  • Entertainment
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Newsletter
Reading: Mueller Report Mystery: Why Is Sergey Shoygu, Russia’s Defense Chief, Mentioned One Time With No Explanation?
Share
Font ResizerAa
Inquisitr NewsInquisitr News
Font ResizerAa
  • News
  • Celebrity
  • Entertainment
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Newsletter
Follow US
© 2025 Inquisitr Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
News

Mueller Report Mystery: Why Is Sergey Shoygu, Russia’s Defense Chief, Mentioned One Time With No Explanation?

Published on: April 23, 2019 at 11:33 PM ET
Jonathan Vankin
Written By Jonathan Vankin
News Writer

As many questions about the Donald Trump Russia scandal that were answered by Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report on his investigation, the report left at least as many unanswered — and raised new questions as well. One such mystery was spotted by independent journalist Scott Stedman on Tuesday, via his Twitter account, when he noticed a single mention in the Mueller Report of Sergey Shoygu, Russia’s defense minister since 2012.

Shoygu’s name appears only in Appendix B-1 , the report’s list of “referenced persons.” But the Russian Defense Minister is not, in fact, referenced anywhere else in the report.

“He doesn’t appear anywhere else in the document,” Stedman noted.

“Is he supposed to be redacted?”

Four other names in the Mueller Report’s list of “referenced persons” appear to have been redacted. Stedman’s suggestion is that the failure to redact Shoygu’s name may have been an error on Mueller’s part, in the report that may be accessed online via The New York Times . But if Mueller mistakenly failed to redact Shoygu’s name from the list of referenced persons, his name must appear earlier in the report, in one of the document’s many redacted passages.

As head of Russia’s military — a position he has held since 2012 — the 64-year-old Army general (pictured at the top of this page, at left, next to Russian President Vladimir Putin) — would have been ultimately responsible for, and likely approved, the Russian hacking attacks on the Democratic Party carried out by Russia’s military intelligence agency, the GRU, according to the Mueller Report Volume 1, Page 36 .

Robert Mueller grimaces.
Special Counsel Robert Mueller did not explain why he mentioned the head of Russia’s military in his report.

Shoygu — whose name is sometimes spelled “Shoigu” — is a close friend and political ally of Putin, and according to The Moscow Times is believed to be in line to succeed Putin as Russia’s president. Polling has repeatedly rated him second only to Putin in popularity.

Shoygu is also believed by Western intelligence agencies to be the architect of Russia’s aggressive military policies, according to The Spectator magazine, including the 2014 annexation of Crimea from Ukraine, and Russia’s intervention in the Syria civil war.

But why is Shoygu mysteriously mentioned in the Mueller Report, with no non-redacted explanation?

Though Shoygu’s name is not mentioned in the non-redacted body of the Mueller Report, the Russian Ministry of Defense is mentioned in connection with Joseph Mifsud, the Maltese academic who told Trump campaign adviser George Papadopoulos that Russia possessed “dirt” on Hillary Clinton in the form of “thousands of emails,” as the Inquisitr has reported.

Sergey Shiygu stares into space,
Russian Defense Minister Sergey Shoygu.

In Volume 1, Page 83 , Mueller appears to say that Mifsud had some connection to “an employee of the Russian Ministry of Defense,” but the specifics of the connection are redacted. The Ministry of Defense “employee” also had links to “a group of Russian military-controlled Facebook accounts that included accounts used to promote the DCLeaks releases in the course of the GRU’s hack-and-release operations.”

In other words, the Russian military was not only hacking and stealing Democratic emails but promoting the stolen documents to the American public through Facebook accounts which Russia’s Defense Ministry secretly controlled — and those accounts were somehow connected to a Defense Ministry “employee” with possible links to Mifsud. How Mifsud was told about the email “dirt” on Clinton held by Russia, as noted at Volume 1, Page 81 of the Mueller Report, has never been explained. Was it via the unnamed Russian Defense Ministry employee? The answer is impossible to determine from the non-redacted text of the report.

TAGGED:Donald Trumprobert mueller
Share This Article
Facebook X Flipboard Whatsapp Whatsapp Telegram Copy Link
Share
Inquisitr NewsInquisitr News
Follow US
© 2025 Inquisitr Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
  • About Us
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA
  • Contact
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?