I love astrology, especially when it can potentially out a celeb who might have been lying about her age. By up to a decade. Experts have looked at celebrity stylist Rachel Zoe’s claim to be a triple-Virgo (born in Virgo, rising sign in Virgo, moon in Virgo) and proclaimed it to be way off:
“[It] isn’t possible if Zoe is 37 and was born on Sept. 1, 1971 […] In fact, says our pro, she’d actually be five to 10 years older than that if she were indeed a Triple-V. So either Zoe’s fibbing, or she’s just starry-eyed when it comes to her sign.”
I vote that Rachel’s not starry-eyed at all, especially after looking at pics like these. At least we don’t have to blame her tanning bed for all the damage! We’d all be a lot nicer about her raisin face if we knew it was 10 years older, wouldn’t we?
Astrology masters, I salute you. This makes so much sense.
