Category: Sport Author : Duncan Riley Posted: July 5, 2009
Tags : Andre Agassi, ATP Tour, Bjorn Borg, grand slam, grand slam tennis, Ivan Lendl, John McEnroe, Ken Rosewall, Pete Sampras, rafael nadal, Rod Laver, roger federer, tennis, wimbledon
After passing Pete Sampras’ record by winning his 15th grand slam tennis title, the question is being asked about whether Roger Federer can now be considered the greatest tennis player of all time.
There are two serious contenders for this title – not considering the likes of John McEnroe or Bjorn Borg, who were not as consistent over as long a period. Sampras and Rod Laver are the others who can be placed alongside Federer in this conversation. Federer now has 15 grand slams among 60 career titles in ATP tour events, compared to Sampras with 14 slams and 64 titles and Laver with 11 slams and 27 ATP titles.
The complication with going on pure statistics is that Laver spent much of the glory years of his career outside the ATP tour, as his run coincided with the advent of the open era. He played as an amateur until 1962, winning six of his slams including a Grand Slam in the calendar year of 1962 before turning professional, which disqualified him from the still-amateur ATP tour. It was not until 1968 that the open era began and he was allowed to return to the ATP tour, after which he completed a second calendar year Grand Slam in 1969 as a professional at the age of 31.
There are arguments either way. Three of the four slam tournaments that Laver played in were on grass, whereas Sampras and Federer have had to win on synthetic surfaces as well. On the other hand, Laver is the only one of the three to have won more than one French Open. You could argue that Sampras may have had the greatest array of opponents facing him, with the likes of Ivan Lendl and Andre Agassi where Laver’s main rival was Ken Rosewall and Federer has struggled mightily with his nemesis in Rafael Nadal.
In fact, it is Nadal who stands in the way of Federer’s claims. Federer did not have to play the Spaniard in either of the last two Slams and it was Nadal who had beaten him in the final of three of the previous four slam tournaments. Federer’s 7-13 record against Nadal, including 2-6 in slams, is the greatest flaw in his record.
Personally, being an Aussie, I realise I am biased in thinking Laver would have the wood over the American and the Swiss champions. However, the six-year hole in his ATP record is only a potential for slam tournaments so we will never know if he could have reached 20 or more. Federer could still get somewhere near there… but only if Nadal stays injured.
![[VIDEO] Comic-Con trailer for ‘The Walking Dead’ hits web, are you going to watch?](http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/2010/08/Picture-15-100x100.png)
![Prince Harry caught on film making racists comments [Video]](http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/princeharry-150x150.jpg)
Jul 5, 2009
I am from china, my english name is jojo, rum more places make more friends
Now i am senior student, thanks for like me of here, my Hobbies is golf, design website, swim, drawing, photoshop, music, shopping, I just designed my business website
http://www.asiahandbag.com and http://www.good-handbag.com over 1 month ago..And I just feel my websites not getting that many views at all..It seem like they are staying the
same…How am i supposed to sell, if no one is really going thru my items…I feel my website is website worthy, and have tried to remain confident, i will promoting website by myself, i think my website will more and more popular, come on jojo!
Jul 6, 2009
Why Roger is the greatest
1. He only have more overall losses to Nadal because he played Nadal more times on clay than Nadal did against him on other surfaces and as a matter of fact, because Nadal failed to bit lesser players along the way…
2. Roger only lost finals outside Roland Garros in the hands of Nadal and Djokavic came EXACTLY during his healthy problems…
3. Roger is more than 4 years older than Nadal which in tennis terms is a huge gap…Do you think a 23-year Federer would be bullied by a similar age Nadal? I don't think so…
4. Finally, Roger's problem against Nadal was mental…I really have the feeling that now that he won everything that there is…he will be a different player against Nadal or even Murray for this matter…
I foresse Roger willing the US Open and if stays fit we may see a Grand Slam next year…one thing is to play knowing if you lose there will be criticism either is to have nothing to lose…
If Ali had fought Frasier more times immediately after his defeat to Frasier himself in 1971, he would certainly lose every time, simply because one needs mental preparation…took Ali 3 years…unfortunately, in tennis you play someone several times in a year…
Jul 7, 2009
Yes, he is a king in tennis.
Jan 30, 2010
Federer is not even close to the greatest tennis player of all time- its the Australian woman Margaret Court whose record includes 24 Grand Slams and 64 majors. Federer is light years away.