inquisitrlogo

 
Comcast: The More You Surf, The Slower Your Speed


Already under fire for its traffic management practices, Comcast is now considering a plan to slow down the connections of users transferring the most data during peak times. The company has just officially said it’s “made no final decisions” about such a practice, but it makes no qualms about the fact that it’s been testing the idea.

So, what is this — some kind of misguided Internet tax system? The more you use, the less you get?

Remember, now, that Comcast first made waves over reports last year claiming it was intentionally slowing BitTorrent transfers to improve its overall network speed. The FCC formally issued its penalty just a day ago, saying that was a violation of communication law and requiring Comcast to disclose detailed information about its other practices. The newly passed regulation makes it illegal for ISPs to “slow any specific applications.”

The user-targeted tactic, then, wouldn’t technically be a violation, since a user isn’t considered an “application.” But give me a break…is it any better? It seems to me to be violating the same principle that led to that law — just doing so in a workaround, loophole-type way.

Comcast says it only seems “fair” to go after the people who are using the most bandwidth. Sure…if by “fair,” you mean “absolutely out of line.” Someone paying for access deserves to get it equally, whether he’s sending five e-mails a day or transferring 20 videos an hour. If Comcast can’t build a network that can handle that, maybe it should just stick to screwing up cable service and let someone else deal with the Internet.











Comments


5 Archived Responses to “ Comcast: The More You Surf, The Slower Your Speed ”

  1. I couldn't agree more. Right here the freeway is being widened as it clogs up during the peak hours. I suppose the authorities could have imposed a 30 or 40 mph speed limit to try and keep the traffic moving, albeit at a lower speed, but they don't. They spend the money (from the taxpayer), and make the road bigger.

    Why can't Comcast do that? Make the pipe bigger. Because Comcast are only really interested in TV, and the net is a very poor second. They'll gladly send me another 30,40,50 channels of dross down that cable, but they don't want to increase what is already one of the slower broadband internet speeds in the world.

    They even charge me more if I only want internet and none of the TV dross. That sucks too, but proves the point above.

    I'd quite happily pay more for Verizon FiOS, except it's not an option here.

  2. damien hobgood
    Feb 17, 2009

    The user-targeted tactic, then, wouldn’t technically be a violation, since a user isn’t considered an “application.” But give me a break…is it any better? It seems to me to be violating the same principle that led to that law — just doing so in a workaround, loophole-type way. ———– this is a nice point that you noticed