Previous research has linked exposure to long-chain perfluorinated compounds with birth defects.
An October 2014 petition called for a ban of FCSs in common food packaging. It was filed by nine organizations: the Natural Resources Defense Council, the Center for Food Safety, the Breast Cancer Fund, the Center for Environmental Health, Clean Water Action, the Center for Science in the Public Interest, Children's Environmental Health Network, Environmental Working Group, and Improving Kids' Environment. The FDA's decision comes in response to the petition.
The environmental coalition's petition referred to a safety review the FDA undertook in 2010 of long-chain perfluorocarboxylates, which are structurally similar to the three perfluorinated chemicals regulated on Jan. 4. The agency's review raised concerns that the perfluorocarboxylates could harm the male and, possibly, female reproductive systems. The coalition said,
"Based on this conclusion, FDA took the unprecedented step of asking three companies with effective Food Contact Substance notifications (FCN) for perfluorocarboxylates to cease their sale and distribution in the United States. In 2011, all three voluntarily agreed,"
FDA is now saying that new information shows, "the toxicity of substances structurally similar to these compounds demonstrate there is no longer a reasonable certainty of no harm from the food-contact use of these [food-contact substances]."
The three banned chemicals are already rarely used, the FDA said in a statement, with most food packaging manufacturers willingly staying away from them. The Daily Environment Report says that the SPI–The Plastics Industry Trade Association seconded the FDA's findings. In their statement, they said,
"It is the understanding of SPI's member companies that the materials listed in FDA's final rule are no longer manufactured for food-contact applications and represent an old technology. FDA's action thus does not impact SPI's members."
"The FDA's ban is an important first step—but just a first step—toward improving the safety of our food supply. Now it should act on our petition to ban the seven other chemicals we believe—and government agencies such as the toxicology program at the National Institutes of Health have found—cause cancer."
According to a report in Bloomberg Bureau of National Affairs (BNA), the Environmental Working Group sees the ban as a hollow one. EWG President Ken Cook said to BNA,
"Industrial chemicals that pollute people's blood clearly have no place in food packaging. It's taken the FDA more than 10 years to figure that out, and it's banning only three chemicals that aren't even made any more."
[Photo by Luke Sharrett/Getty Images]