<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Inquisitr &#187; Tele Atlas</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.inquisitr.com/tag/tele-atlas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.inquisitr.com</link>
	<description>The Better Mix</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 23:40:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Google&#8217;s challenge to mapmaker exclusivity is a good thing</title>
		<link>http://www.inquisitr.com/42103/googles-challenge-to-mapmaker-exclusivity-is-a-good-thing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.inquisitr.com/42103/googles-challenge-to-mapmaker-exclusivity-is-a-good-thing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 18:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven Hodson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google maps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Navteq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tele Atlas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inquisitr.com/?p=42103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />A lot of folks might give Google flack over its 800 pound gorilla status whenever it enters into a new arena, myself included, but there are times where the company&#8217;s stature does do some good. Such as case is Google&#8217;s decision to start using its own accumulated mapping data for the back end of Google [...]<p><a href="http://www.inquisitr.com/42103/googles-challenge-to-mapmaker-exclusivity-is-a-good-thing/">Google&#8217;s challenge to mapmaker exclusivity is a good thing</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.inquisitr.com">The Inquisitr</a></p>
<br /><br /><br />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-42105" title="google-map" src="http://images.inquisitr.com/wp-content/2009/10/google-map.png" alt="google-map" width="261" height="190" /></p>
<p>A lot of folks might give Google flack over its 800 pound gorilla status whenever it enters into a new arena, myself included, but there are times where the company&#8217;s stature does do some good. Such as case is Google&#8217;s decision to start using its own accumulated mapping data for the back end of Google Maps. Up until this point it had been using the data provided by Tele Atlas and Navteq before that to populate their Maps data points.</p>
<p>In his post announcing the change <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_maps_ditches_teleatlas_in_favor_of_street_view_cars_crowdsourcing.php">Frederic Lardinois at ReadWriteWeb discusses</a> the reasons why Google made the change</p>
<blockquote><p>The question, of course, is why Google plans to make its own maps now. For  one, chances are that Google is currently paying Tele Atlas a lot of money for  using its maps. Mapping services are notoriously protective of how their data  can be used, which is one of the reasons Apple can&#8217;t offer turn-by-turn  directions in the built-in mapping application on the iPhone, for example.  Google probably wants to be free to do whatever it wants to do with its maps  without having to worry about licensing issues.</p>
<p>By providing its own maps and an API for others to use these maps, Google  could potentially become a major competitor to Tele Atlas and Navteq now and if  Google continues to make these maps easily available to developers without  cumbersome licensing restrictions, it could bring radical change to the mapping  business.</p></blockquote>
<p>For much too long niche businesses like Tele Atlas have been able to charge exorbitant amounts of money for their services only because the competition in their field  was so narrow. Regardless of how companies in niche businesses might like to claim that because their potential area of business is so small and so much work goes into providing their service they need to charge the high fees that they do.</p>
<p>Unfortunately this kind of action has a negative impact on innovation because of the high cost of building interesting and useful accessory services. By Google stepping into the map making business the way that they are they have removed that barrier which can only lead to innovative uses of that data.</p>
<p>If I were Tele Atlas or Nokia&#8217;s Navteq division I&#8217;d be doing some serious reconsideration of fees and data access because Google has once again changed the game in another industry.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.inquisitr.com/42103/googles-challenge-to-mapmaker-exclusivity-is-a-good-thing/">Google&#8217;s challenge to mapmaker exclusivity is a good thing</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.inquisitr.com">The Inquisitr</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.inquisitr.com/42103/googles-challenge-to-mapmaker-exclusivity-is-a-good-thing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:thumbnail url="http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/2009/10/google-map-100x100.png" />
		<media:content url="http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/2009/10/google-map.png" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">google-map</media:title>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/2009/10/google-map-100x100.png" />
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

