<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Inquisitr &#187; survey</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.inquisitr.com/tag/survey/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.inquisitr.com</link>
	<description>The Better Mix</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 22:26:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Secret Smartphone Videos Survey Reveals What People Like To Capture</title>
		<link>http://www.inquisitr.com/150970/secret-smartphone-videos-survey-reveals-what-people-like-to-capture/</link>
		<comments>http://www.inquisitr.com/150970/secret-smartphone-videos-survey-reveals-what-people-like-to-capture/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2011 13:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Johnson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smartphone Survey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smartphone Videos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[survey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voyeur]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inquisitr.com/?p=150970</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />While &#8220;sexting&#8221; might be the hot button issue for many Smartphone photo and video takers there are other activities that believe it or not actually end up consuming more of an amateur videographers time. According to a recent report by the Baltimore Sun the following video captures are the most common among Smartphone users: 23%: People in [...]<p><a href="http://www.inquisitr.com/150970/secret-smartphone-videos-survey-reveals-what-people-like-to-capture/">Secret Smartphone Videos Survey Reveals What People Like To Capture</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.inquisitr.com">The Inquisitr</a></p>
<br /><br /><br />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-150971" title="iPhone 4 Video shooting" src="http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/2011/10/iPhone-4-Video-shooting.png" alt="iPhone 4 Video shooting" width="482" height="292" /></p>
<p>While &#8220;sexting&#8221; might be the hot button issue for many Smartphone photo and video takers there are other activities that believe it or not actually end up consuming more of an amateur videographers time.</p>
<p>According to a recent report by the <em><a href="http://weblogs.baltimoresun.com/news/technology/2011/10/americans_love_to_shoot_secret.html" target="_blank">Baltimore Sun</a> </em>the following video captures are the most common among Smartphone users:</p>
<ul>
<li>23%: People in embarrassing outfits.</li>
<li>15%: A person tripping or falling.</li>
<li>10%: A sexy waitress.</li>
<li>9%: A shirtless hunk mowing the neighbor’s lawn.</li>
<li>7%: Cheerleaders.</li>
<li>7%: A boss or co-worker eating a second donut.</li>
<li>6%: Repulsive grooming habits.</li>
</ul>
<div>It should be noted that only 50% of those surveyed said they would take a secret video using their Smartphones which means the answers above only represent half of the actual Smartphone using market.</div>
<div>With HD recording capabilities now available on most new to market Smartphones I can&#8217;t say it surprises me that so many secret videos are being recorded, although the subject matter is something completely different than what I would have suspected.</div>
<div>Have you taken a secret Smartphone video? What was your video about?</div>
<p><a href="http://www.inquisitr.com/150970/secret-smartphone-videos-survey-reveals-what-people-like-to-capture/">Secret Smartphone Videos Survey Reveals What People Like To Capture</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.inquisitr.com">The Inquisitr</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.inquisitr.com/150970/secret-smartphone-videos-survey-reveals-what-people-like-to-capture/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
	
		<media:thumbnail url="http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/2011/10/iPhone-4-Video-shooting-100x100.png" />
		<media:content url="http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/2011/10/iPhone-4-Video-shooting.png" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">iPhone 4 Video shooting</media:title>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/2011/10/iPhone-4-Video-shooting-100x100.png" />
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apparently Canadians are jumping all over that new-fangled smartphone thing</title>
		<link>http://www.inquisitr.com/110330/apparently-canadians-are-jumping-all-over-that-new-fangled-smartphone-thing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.inquisitr.com/110330/apparently-canadians-are-jumping-all-over-that-new-fangled-smartphone-thing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 21:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven Hodson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[survey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inquisitr.com/?p=110330</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />I realize that for the most part us Canucks (Canadians to the rest of ya) are a pretty laid back bunch of folks who take our time to warm up to new and cool things but it seems that we are only now joining our neighbors to the south in their love for all things [...]<p><a href="http://www.inquisitr.com/110330/apparently-canadians-are-jumping-all-over-that-new-fangled-smartphone-thing/">Apparently Canadians are jumping all over that new-fangled smartphone thing</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.inquisitr.com">The Inquisitr</a></p>
<br /><br /><br />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-110331" title="canadian-flag" src="http://images.inquisitr.com/wp-content/2011/05/canadian-flag.jpg" alt="" width="380" height="277" /></p>
<p>I realize that for the most part us Canucks (Canadians to the rest of ya) are a pretty laid back bunch of folks who take our time to warm up to new and cool things but it seems that we are only now joining our neighbors to the south in their love for all things smartphonie.</p>
<p>This is according to a new survey from Ipsos Reid where they are reporting that 31% of Canadians now own a smartphone, which is a jump of more that 50% over last year.</p>
<p>Not only are more of us owning the things but we&#8217;re doing more things on them than we ever have in the past.</p>
<blockquote><p>“For several years, smartphone growth was incremental at best, but in 2011, it’s been exponential” says Steve Mossop, President with Ipsos Reid’s Western Canada practice. “A combination of device enhancements, Android, and the explosion of apps has resulted in a significant uptake of smartphones among Canadians to the point where usage levels are competing television viewing and internet browsing in terms of hours spent.”</p>
<p>Not surprisingly, smartphone ownership is significantly higher amongst younger Canadians; in particular, 46 percent of those online Canadians aged 18 to 34 own a smartphone, and their usage (21 hours per week) is significantly higher than older Canadians.</p>
<p>And for the first time ever, the majority of smartphone usage (54 percent) is for activities other than talking (you know, the original purpose of a phone back in the 1900s). Smartphone users take photos (70 percent), send or read email (70 percent), check the weather (52 percent), and send or receive IM’s (52 percent) with their device. The most drastic increase in smartphone usage rates is connected with social networking (Facebook, Twitter, etc.), with 48 percent of smartphone owners use their devices to check social networking sites, an increase of nearly twenty points since previously measured in the spring of 2010.</p>
<p>via <a href="http://www.techvibes.com/blog/canadian-smartphone-ownership-has-shot-up-50-percent-in-just-one-year-2011-05-31">TechVibes</a></p></blockquote>
<p>I will say that it sure makes those long winter nights in the igloo a lot more enjoyable.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.inquisitr.com/110330/apparently-canadians-are-jumping-all-over-that-new-fangled-smartphone-thing/">Apparently Canadians are jumping all over that new-fangled smartphone thing</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.inquisitr.com">The Inquisitr</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.inquisitr.com/110330/apparently-canadians-are-jumping-all-over-that-new-fangled-smartphone-thing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
	
		<media:thumbnail url="http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/2011/05/canadian-flag-100x100.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/2011/05/canadian-flag.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">canadian-flag</media:title>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/2011/05/canadian-flag-100x100.jpg" />
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Would people pay for Twitter? Survey says &#8230;. No.</title>
		<link>http://www.inquisitr.com/80399/would-people-pay-for-twitter-survey-says-no/</link>
		<comments>http://www.inquisitr.com/80399/would-people-pay-for-twitter-survey-says-no/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 17:35:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven Hodson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[survey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inquisitr.com/?p=80399</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />Like this is any real surprise but Mike Melanson over at ReadWriteWeb brings us the results of a recent survey taken by the University of Southern California&#8217;s Annenberg School for Communications and Journalism as part of its yearly Digital Future report (pdf). The survey asked 2,000 people if they would pay to use Twitter and [...]<p><a href="http://www.inquisitr.com/80399/would-people-pay-for-twitter-survey-says-no/">Would people pay for Twitter? Survey says &#8230;. No.</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.inquisitr.com">The Inquisitr</a></p>
<br /><br /><br />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-80401" title="twitter-banner" src="http://images.inquisitr.com/wp-content/2010/07/twitter-banner.png" alt="" width="424" height="136" /></p>
<p>Like this is any real surprise<a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/survey_0_would_pay_for_twitter.php"> but Mike Melanson over at ReadWriteWeb brings us the results</a> of a recent survey taken by the University of Southern California&#8217;s Annenberg School for Communications and Journalism as part of its yearly <em>Digital Future</em> report (<a href="http://www.digitalcenter.org/pdf/2010_digital_future_final_release.pdf">pdf</a>).</p>
<p>The survey asked 2,000 people if they would pay to use Twitter and the results were that &#8230; are you ready &#8230;. zero percent would be willing to pay.</p>
<blockquote><p>Jeffrey Cole, director of the Center for the Digital Future, said that the  response shows just how difficult it can be to begin charging users for services  and goods they already receive for free.</p>
<p>&#8220;Twitter has no plans to charge its users, but this result illustrates,  beyond any doubt, the<br />
tremendous problem of transforming free users into  paying users,&#8221; said Cole. &#8220;Online providers<br />
face major challenges to get  customers to pay for services they now receive for free.&#8221;</p>
<p>Of the survey&#8217;s 1,981 respondents, 49% had &#8220;used free micro-blogs such as  Twitter.&#8221; While 70% said that they found Internet advertising annoying, it was  by far the most preferable outcome (outside of completely free, ad-free  content), with 55% of respondents saying they &#8220;would rather see Web advertising  than pay for content.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Like I said, color me surprised.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.inquisitr.com/80399/would-people-pay-for-twitter-survey-says-no/">Would people pay for Twitter? Survey says &#8230;. No.</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.inquisitr.com">The Inquisitr</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.inquisitr.com/80399/would-people-pay-for-twitter-survey-says-no/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:thumbnail url="http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/2010/07/twitter-banner-100x100.png" />
		<media:content url="http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/2010/07/twitter-banner.png" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">twitter-banner</media:title>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/2010/07/twitter-banner-100x100.png" />
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hell, yes: 64% of gamers prefer physical copies over digital downloads</title>
		<link>http://www.inquisitr.com/77679/hell-yes-64-of-gamers-prefer-physical-copies-over-digital-downloads/</link>
		<comments>http://www.inquisitr.com/77679/hell-yes-64-of-gamers-prefer-physical-copies-over-digital-downloads/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 01:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Greenhough</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dlc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gamers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[survey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inquisitr.com/?p=77679</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />Call me a bluff old traditionalist out of touch with the modern world, but I&#8217;d take a physical copy of a game over a downloadable version any day of the week. Why do I feel this way, when downloadable games are so easily accessible, environmentally friendly, and convenient? Well, there are a few reasons. I [...]<p><a href="http://www.inquisitr.com/77679/hell-yes-64-of-gamers-prefer-physical-copies-over-digital-downloads/">Hell, yes: 64% of gamers prefer physical copies over digital downloads</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.inquisitr.com">The Inquisitr</a></p>
<br /><br /><br />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><a rel="attachment wp-att-77680" href="http://www.inquisitr.com/77679/hell-yes-64-of-gamers-prefer-physical-copies-over-digital-downloads/physical-games-rule/"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-77680" title="physical games rule" src="http://images.inquisitr.com/wp-content/2010/07/physical-games-rule.jpg" alt="" width="501" height="346" /></a></p>
<p>Call me a bluff old traditionalist out of touch with the modern world, but I&#8217;d take a physical copy of a game over a downloadable version any day of the week. Why do I feel this way, when downloadable games are so easily accessible, environmentally friendly, and convenient?</p>
<p>Well, there are a few reasons. I love the ceremony and process of browsing through games in a bricks-and-mortar store, I love the thrill of opening a new game, I love that fresh box smell, I love a <em>lot</em> of videogame boxart, and I love being able to sell games that I&#8217;m done with.</p>
<p>None of which is part of <em>coldly downloading a game</em>.</p>
<p>Thankfully, it&#8217;s not just me who feels this way. 64% of us gamers still prefer physical copies of our games over digital downloads, according to a survey of over 1,000 people by research firm Ipsos MediaCT. Aside from the reasons I mentioned above, gamers also fear losing games that have been downloaded.</p>
<p>While I accept that traditional physical games will eventually be phased out, I dearly, dearly hope it&#8217;s not for a long time. Now get off my damn lawn.</p>
<p>[Via <a href="http://www.computerandvideogames.com/article.php?id=254121?cid=OTC-RSS&amp;attr=CVG-General-RSS">CVG</a>]</p>
<p><a href="http://www.inquisitr.com/77679/hell-yes-64-of-gamers-prefer-physical-copies-over-digital-downloads/">Hell, yes: 64% of gamers prefer physical copies over digital downloads</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.inquisitr.com">The Inquisitr</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.inquisitr.com/77679/hell-yes-64-of-gamers-prefer-physical-copies-over-digital-downloads/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:thumbnail url="http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/2010/07/physical-games-rule-100x100.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/2010/07/physical-games-rule.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">physical games rule</media:title>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/2010/07/physical-games-rule-100x100.jpg" />
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>People gaming for longer, &#8216;extreme gamers&#8217; averaging 48 hours per week</title>
		<link>http://www.inquisitr.com/74025/people-gaming-for-longer-extreme-gamers-averaging-48-hours-per-week/</link>
		<comments>http://www.inquisitr.com/74025/people-gaming-for-longer-extreme-gamers-averaging-48-hours-per-week/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 05:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Greenhough</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gamers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardcore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[npd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[survey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inquisitr.com/?p=74025</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />Industry analysts are forecasting lower videogame sales this year, but people are playing games for longer than ever. A new online survey of over 18,000 people by the NPD Group shows gamers in the U.S. spend an average of 13 hours per week at their PC, on their game consoles, or with a handheld device [...]<p><a href="http://www.inquisitr.com/74025/people-gaming-for-longer-extreme-gamers-averaging-48-hours-per-week/">People gaming for longer, &#8216;extreme gamers&#8217; averaging 48 hours per week</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.inquisitr.com">The Inquisitr</a></p>
<br /><br /><br />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><a rel="attachment wp-att-74026" href="http://www.inquisitr.com/74025/people-gaming-for-longer-extreme-gamers-averaging-48-hours-per-week/hardcore_gamer/"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-74026" title="hardcore_gamer" src="http://images.inquisitr.com/wp-content/2010/05/hardcore_gamer.jpg" alt="" width="485" height="263" /></a></p>
<p>Industry analysts are forecasting lower videogame sales this year, but people are playing games for longer than ever.</p>
<p>A new online survey of over 18,000 people by the <a href="http://npd.com/corpServlet?nextpage=corp_welcome.html">NPD Group</a> shows gamers in the U.S. spend an average of 13 hours per week at their PC, on their game consoles, or with a handheld device in their mitts. That&#8217;s up from from 12.3 hours in 2009.</p>
<p>So far, so mildly interesting, but the NPD also divided survey participants on how much time each spent playing.</p>
<p>They found a minority at the top, labeled by NPD as &#8220;extreme gamers&#8221;, who averaged 48.5 hours of playing games per week &#8211; close to <em>seven hours a day</em>. Oh, sure, mock all you want, but these are the zombie-slayers and robot-killers of tomorrow, and they&#8217;re more prepared than <em>you</em> for when it all goes tits up in the real world. Heroes, the bally lot of you.</p>
<p>[Via <a href="http://www.gamasutra.com/view/news/28729/Average_Gaming_Time_On_The_Rise_In_US.php">Gamasutra</a>]</p>
<p><a href="http://www.inquisitr.com/74025/people-gaming-for-longer-extreme-gamers-averaging-48-hours-per-week/">People gaming for longer, &#8216;extreme gamers&#8217; averaging 48 hours per week</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.inquisitr.com">The Inquisitr</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.inquisitr.com/74025/people-gaming-for-longer-extreme-gamers-averaging-48-hours-per-week/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:thumbnail url="http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/2010/05/hardcore_gamer-100x100.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/2010/05/hardcore_gamer.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">hardcore_gamer</media:title>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/2010/05/hardcore_gamer-100x100.jpg" />
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yup, It&#8217;s true, we have influence &#8211; now what?</title>
		<link>http://www.inquisitr.com/6604/yup-its-true-we-have-influence-now-what/</link>
		<comments>http://www.inquisitr.com/6604/yup-its-true-we-have-influence-now-what/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 06:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven Hodson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[survey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inquisitr.com/?p=6604</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />This is hilarious after a fashion. On one hand we had the big kerfuffle last week about blogs dying off and being replaced by microblogging services like Twitter, FriendFeed etc. Now we have Jupiter Research; who was commissioned by BuzzLogic, saying that bloggers are growing not only numbers but also in influence. Would somebody please [...]<p><a href="http://www.inquisitr.com/6604/yup-its-true-we-have-influence-now-what/">Yup, It&#8217;s true, we have influence &#8211; now what?</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.inquisitr.com">The Inquisitr</a></p>
<br /><br /><br />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/wtf_cat.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-6605" style="margin-left: 10px; margin-bottom: 10px;" title="Would you people please make up your minds" src="http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/wtf_cat-242x300.jpg" alt="Would you people please make up your minds" width="242" height="300" /></a>This is hilarious after a fashion. On one hand we had the big kerfuffle <a title="Oh No! Everything Is Dead Let’s Microblog About It" href="http://www.inquisitr.com/6263/oh-no-everything-is-dead-lets-microblog-about-it/">last week about blogs dying off</a> and being replaced by microblogging services like Twitter, FriendFeed etc. Now we have <a href="http://www.jupiterresearch.com/bin/item.pl/home/">Jupiter Research</a>; who was commissioned by <a href="http://www.buzzlogic.com/">BuzzLogic</a>, saying that bloggers are growing not only numbers but also in influence. Would somebody please make up their freaking minds because this is bordering on being nothing short of stupid. Not only that but we also have some Rubicon Consulting number crunchers saying that <a title="Word of mouth tops online reviews as purchase influencer, survey finds " href="http://www.inquisitr.com/6341/word-of-mouth-tops-online-reviews-as-purchase-influencer-survey-finds/">word of mouth and online reviews</a> are trumping everything as purchasing influencers. It makes one wonder if these people can even add one and one and come up with two for crying out loud.</p>
<p>According the the report which I came across <a title="Study Proves Blogs Influence Online Population Once Again" href="http://profy.com/2008/10/28/study-proves-blogs-influence-online-population-once-again/">via Svetlana Gladkova</a> at Profy.com half of the blog readers said that they used blogs to find purchasing information. First off the survey only accosted 2,200 iinternet users as part of the survey so 50% of that works out to 1,100 people who said they read blogs &#8211; well I guess that&#8217;s a pretty good percentage but when it comes to whether the blogs they read were of Engadget or Inquisitr quality or if in fact they were all like some Dimwitty from Boise blog.</p>
<p>As rosy as this might paint the revenue streams for bloggers with the color green let&#8217;s get realistic here. No two sets of numbers are the same which in reality makes them all suspect and full of crap. It doesn&#8217;t matter what cute little fad comes along that is proclaimed as the next great communication medium because no two people can agree on that either. It&#8217;s all a matter of stupid hype. the best thing we can honestly do is keep on doing what we are doing. Keep on being honest with our readers and let them decide <strong>as they always have and always will</strong> whether we are worth their attention.</p>
<p>Hopefully here at the Inquisitr we do just that &#8211; that is the best we can hope for.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.inquisitr.com/6604/yup-its-true-we-have-influence-now-what/">Yup, It&#8217;s true, we have influence &#8211; now what?</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.inquisitr.com">The Inquisitr</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.inquisitr.com/6604/yup-its-true-we-have-influence-now-what/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:thumbnail url="http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/wtf_cat.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/wtf_cat.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Would you people please make up your minds</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

