<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Inquisitr &#187; search technology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.inquisitr.com/tag/search-technology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.inquisitr.com</link>
	<description>The Better Mix</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:37:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Google Talks Search Technology</title>
		<link>http://www.inquisitr.com/1723/google-talks-search-technology/</link>
		<comments>http://www.inquisitr.com/1723/google-talks-search-technology/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 19:05:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JR</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inquisitr.com/?p=1723</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />Google has published the second part of a blog series explaining the methods behind its search systems. Last week, we saw some broad Q&#038;A about the processes and the philosophies of Google search &#8212; including discussions on things such as whether search results are ever manually edited &#8212; but no major revelations about algorithms or [...]<p><a href="http://www.inquisitr.com/1723/google-talks-search-technology/">Google Talks Search Technology</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.inquisitr.com">The Inquisitr</a></p>
<br /><br /><br />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/googletech.jpg" alt="" title="googletech" width="250" height="246" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-1724" />Google has published the <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2008/07/technologies-behind-google-ranking.html">second part of a blog series</a> explaining the methods behind its search systems.</p>
<p>Last week, we saw some broad Q&#038;A about <a href="http://www.inquisitr.com/1568/google-opens-up-about-ranking-process/">the processes and the philosophies of Google search</a> &#8212; including discussions on things such as whether search results are ever manually edited &#8212; but no major revelations about algorithms or other closely guarded Google mysteries.  </p>
<p>This week&#8217;s edition, which was billed to be a more in-depth look at the technology driving the search process, doesn&#8217;t bring about any jaw-dropping &#8220;ahah&#8221; moments either.  Google Fellow Amit Singhal discusses basic concepts of the process and the general goals on which it focuses.  It&#8217;s certainly nothing earth-shattering &#8212; the post seems to be more PR-oriented than anything &#8212; but there are a couple of mildly interesting points worth a glance.</p>
<p>Here are the highlights, condensed down into a manageable 196 words for quick and easy digestion:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;It uses statistical signals of word salience, like word frequency, to rank pages.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;One of the key technologies we have developed to understand pages is associating important concepts to a page even when they are not obvious on the page.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Other technologies we have developed include distinctions between important and less important words in the page and the freshness of the information on the page.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;It is critical that we understand what our users are looking for (beyond just the few words in their query). We have made several notable advances in this area including a best-in-class spelling suggestion system, an advanced synonyms system, and a very strong concept analysis system.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p> &#8220;The same query typed in multiple countries may deserve completely different results. A user looking for [bank] in the US should get American banks, whereas a user in the UK is either looking for the Bank Fashion line or for British financial institutions.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Personalization is another strong feature in our search system which tailors search results to individual users. Users who are logged-in while searching and have signed up for Web History get results that are more relevant for them than the general Google results.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.inquisitr.com/1723/google-talks-search-technology/">Google Talks Search Technology</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.inquisitr.com">The Inquisitr</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.inquisitr.com/1723/google-talks-search-technology/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:thumbnail url="http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/googletech.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/googletech.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">googletech</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

