Okay, just a few comments: forget the mole business, forget the horror that was R. Kelly’s face when that evidence was presented, too. . . because he has been acquitted of all fourteen counts of child pornography. There’s not too much I can say, since he’s Not Guilty, but I admit that I Feel Weird. After reading so much on the trial, it really seemed to be going in another direction. Especially after this.

Is this another case of a celebrity getting off easy? Perhaps after I hear from you, I’ll realize that the better question was– did I need to ask?

No related posts.

R. Kelly’s going to be in trouble, or so it seems as we watch his trial progress this week. The R&B star faced damaging testimony regarding the 27-minute sex tape filmed with a girl as young as 13, and it all had to do with his mole.

After freeze-frame shots taken from the vid were compared to R. Kelly’s photos, it turned out that the same mole, in the exact same place, made a little cameo. Not surprisingly, Kelly was looking pretty grim as the evidence was trotted out. In addition, it would have taken 44 years to add the mole frame by frame, video expert Grant Fredericks stated.

So answer this: who’s screwed now? (Sorry, I couldn’t resist!)

No related posts.