<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Inquisitr &#187; popularity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.inquisitr.com/tag/popularity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.inquisitr.com</link>
	<description>The Better Mix</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 21:19:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Nintendo&#8217;s Wii more popular than cats in the UK</title>
		<link>http://www.inquisitr.com/86627/one-in-three-households-has-a-wii/</link>
		<comments>http://www.inquisitr.com/86627/one-in-three-households-has-a-wii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 22:06:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Greenhough</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[captain obvious]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nintendo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[popularity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wii]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inquisitr.com/?p=86627</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />I know the Wii is popular, but this is ridiculous: according to the number crunchers at GfK Chart-Track, Nintendo&#8217;s Wii console is now in one-third of British homes. That means there are more Wiis than cats (or dogs!) in the UK. Needless to say, Nintendo has leapt on this (admittedly impressive) stat in its marketing [...]<p><a href="http://www.inquisitr.com/86627/one-in-three-households-has-a-wii/">Nintendo&#8217;s Wii more popular than cats in the UK</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.inquisitr.com">The Inquisitr</a></p>
<br /><br /><br />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><a rel="attachment wp-att-86628" href="http://www.inquisitr.com/86627/one-in-three-households-has-a-wii/wii-in-one-in-three-homes/"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-86628" title="wii in one in three homes" src="http://images.inquisitr.com/wp-content/2010/10/wii-in-one-in-three-homes.jpg" alt="" width="360" height="259" /></a></p>
<p>I know the Wii is popular, but this is ridiculous: according to the number crunchers at GfK Chart-Track, Nintendo&#8217;s Wii console is now in one-third of British homes. That means there are more Wiis <a href="http://www.dogmagazine.net/archives/4954/uk-domestic-dog-population-is-larger-than-originally-thought/">than cats (or dogs!) in the UK</a>.</p>
<p>Needless to say, Nintendo has leapt on this (admittedly impressive) stat in its marketing for Christmas, which will involve the Queen appearing in an advert for the company. Or <a href="http://www.californiachronicle.com/articles/yb/150590814">Helen Mirren</a>. Which is sort of the same thing. Also appearing will be Terry Wogan, Alexandra Burke, and <em>X Factor</em> poppets JLS.</p>
<p>Nintendo&#8217;s dominance is greater in the UK than almost anywhere else &#8211; and just to prove it, GfK Chart-Track points out that one in six Brits own a <a href="http://www.californiachronicle.com/articles/yb/150590814">Nintendo DS</a>.</p>
<p>[Via <a href="http://www.gamesindustry.biz/articles/2010-10-04-one-in-three-households-have-wii-console">GamesIndustry.biz</a>]</p>
<p><a href="http://www.inquisitr.com/86627/one-in-three-households-has-a-wii/">Nintendo&#8217;s Wii more popular than cats in the UK</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.inquisitr.com">The Inquisitr</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.inquisitr.com/86627/one-in-three-households-has-a-wii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:thumbnail url="http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/2010/10/wii-in-one-in-three-homes-100x100.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/2010/10/wii-in-one-in-three-homes.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">wii in one in three homes</media:title>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/2010/10/wii-in-one-in-three-homes-100x100.jpg" />
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another brilliantly stupid idea of Twitter Lists &#8211; Country Lists</title>
		<link>http://www.inquisitr.com/46213/another-brilliantly-stupid-idea-of-twitter-lists-country-lists/</link>
		<comments>http://www.inquisitr.com/46213/another-brilliantly-stupid-idea-of-twitter-lists-country-lists/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 22:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven Hodson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A-List]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[popularity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ranking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter lists]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inquisitr.com/?p=46213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />It has only be a few days since the roll out of the Twitter Lists and while most of the social media mavens are getting woodies over how great this is all going to be we are seeing new ideas being thought of each day, hour, minute that will only go to show just how [...]<p><a href="http://www.inquisitr.com/46213/another-brilliantly-stupid-idea-of-twitter-lists-country-lists/">Another brilliantly stupid idea of Twitter Lists &#8211; Country Lists</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.inquisitr.com">The Inquisitr</a></p>
<br /><br /><br />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-46219" title="twitter-wish-list" src="http://images.inquisitr.com/wp-content/2009/11/twitter-wish-list.jpg" alt="twitter-wish-list" width="200" height="150" /></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #ffffff;">It has only be a few days since the roll out of the Twitter Lists and while most of the social media mavens are getting woodies over how great this is all going to be we are seeing new ideas being thought of each day, hour, minute that will only go to show just how badly this potentially great idea is going to get abused left right and center.</span></p>
<p>The current top idea that has come to light today is the idea being brought to you by a <em>&lt;shudder&gt;</em> social media consultancy <em>&lt;/shudder&gt;</em> called<a href="http://www.simplyzesty.com/"> Simplyzesty</a>. It started yesterday with them creating a hand curated list of Twitterers who live in Ireland, and now today the word is that they are starting with lists for the US and UK.</p>
<p>The thing is with these lists is that they will be using some sort of automated system to create these two lists. Automated huh, well we all know that means that just as with any other scripts that can be run this stand the chance of being hijacked in some form or another.</p>
<p>According to Mike Butcher at TechCrunch (Europe) the process for getting on these lists will be as follows:</p>
<blockquote><p>“Here’s how you get yourself into the list. The Irish one was built by hand, but  the others are going to be built with a script but <em>(sic)</em> Twitter users  tweeting “I want to get listed #TwitterCalifonia [or another state]” and  Simplyzesty will collect all the tweets and add them to the lists for each  State. In the UK Twitter users can tweet #TwitterEssex, replacing the county  name with the county you live in.”</p></blockquote>
<p>While Butcher notes that this won&#8217;t be a comprehensive list of sat Twitterers in Washington State or in London England I would be willing to bet that it will be full of spammer Twitter accounts. There is no mention in anything I have read about this automation of creating Country specific list as to whether there will be any oversight as to who actually gets on those lists.</p>
<p><a href="http://thenextweb.com/2009/11/04/twitter-lists-countries-work/">Even the guys at The Next Web</a> are having a hard time seeing any real value to the whole idea.</p>
<blockquote><p>While it’s certainly interesting to see what everyone in a particular area is  talking about, this isn’t the way to do it. All the company will have produced  is a list of the people who are attention-seeking enough to want to be on it.  What about all the other people out there in your state or county who aren’t on  the list? Don’t they have something interesting to say?</p></blockquote>
<p>On the surface, as with much of Web 2.0 and social media the warm and fuzzy of the goodness of man will win out, ideas like these are bound to become a way for spammers and less than ethical marketers to get their names on as many lists as possible thereby diluting the value of the original concept.</p>
<p>Call me pessimistic if you want but I tend to look at stuff like this with a healthy dose of realism and an understanding of how human nature isn&#8217;t always as pure in its motives as we might like to think.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.inquisitr.com/46213/another-brilliantly-stupid-idea-of-twitter-lists-country-lists/">Another brilliantly stupid idea of Twitter Lists &#8211; Country Lists</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.inquisitr.com">The Inquisitr</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.inquisitr.com/46213/another-brilliantly-stupid-idea-of-twitter-lists-country-lists/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:thumbnail url="http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/2009/11/twitter-wish-list-100x100.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/2009/11/twitter-wish-list.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">twitter-wish-list</media:title>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/2009/11/twitter-wish-list-100x100.jpg" />
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Technorati, the little service that couldn&#8217;t</title>
		<link>http://www.inquisitr.com/24111/technorati-the-little-service-that-couldnt/</link>
		<comments>http://www.inquisitr.com/24111/technorati-the-little-service-that-couldnt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 21:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven Hodson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[popularity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ranking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technorati]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inquisitr.com/24111/technorati-the-little-service-that-couldnt/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />At one time regardless of the number of new bloggers that poop-up up a daily basis one of the first ting we all did was to sign up for a Technorati account. This was the best way at the time to see how well our blog(s) where doing against the rest of ht blogosphere. It [...]<p><a href="http://www.inquisitr.com/24111/technorati-the-little-service-that-couldnt/">Technorati, the little service that couldn&rsquo;t</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.inquisitr.com">The Inquisitr</a></p>
<br /><br /><br />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><center><img title="technorati-button" border="0" alt="technorati-button" src="http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/technoratibutton.jpg" width="270" height="241" /></center> </p>
<p>At one time regardless of the number of new bloggers that poop-up up a daily basis one of the first ting we all did was to sign up for a <a title="Technorati" href="http://www.technorati.com">Technorati</a> account. This was the best way at the time to see how well our blog(s) where doing against the rest of ht blogosphere. It was out of the Technorati listings that we first got use to the term of a-Listers as well has our own ranking based on the number of discovered links that linked back to our posts..</p>
<p>Over the years though as the service tried to find new ways to make relevant to bloggers of all types that have showily moved further and further away from their core business – being an valuable ranking system an blog discovery system for other bloggers. Unfortunately even with their new leadership this divergence for the core business has progressed even further; with the individual becoming secondary to mainstream media being the driving force for a service barely limping.</p>
<p>In fact if you look at the numbers that have been collected by Dean Takahashi from the VentureBeat Blog it is easy to see that rather than the individual blogger; or the small blog networks it is all about mainstream publication taking over the ranking systems. In his breakdown Dean provides the numbers for the last 30 days – as well as the gainers and losers.</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>New to the top 50</strong>      <br />The Dallas Morning News      <br />San Jose Mercury News      <br />Star Tribune</p>
<p><strong>Out of the top 50</strong>      <br />US News &amp; World Report      <br />Rolling Stone      <br />Christian Science Monitor      <br />International Herald Tribune (now part of nytimes.com)</p>
<p><strong>Five biggest gainers in rank</strong>      <br />PBS      <br />The Houston Chronicle      <br />Google News      <br />NY Post      <br />Slate</p>
<p><strong>Five biggest losses in rank</strong>      <br />The Economist      <br />Chicago Tribune      <br />The White House      <br />Financial Times      <br />Newsweek</p>
<p><strong>Five biggest gainers in attention</strong>      <br />YouTube      <br />The Wall Street Journal      <br />CNN      <br />LA Times      <br />Wired</p>
<p><strong>Five biggest losses in attention</strong>      <br />Reuters      <br />Telegraph.co.uk      <br />The Boston Globe      <br />Financial Times      <br />The Economist</p>
<p><strong>Overall Rankings and Attention</strong>      <br />1.&#160;&#160; YouTube 60,644      <br />2.&#160;&#160; The New York Times 17,374      <br />3.&#160;&#160; guardian.co.uk 8,039      <br />4.&#160;&#160; The Wall Street Journal ­7,513      <br />5.&#160;&#160; The Washington Post 6,891      <br />6.&#160;&#160; CNN 6,330      <br />7.&#160;&#160; Telegraph.co.uk ­5,380      <br />8.&#160;&#160; Yahoo! News 5,070      <br />9.&#160;&#160; MSNBC 5,036      <br />10. The Los Angeles Times 4,536      <br />11. Reuters ­4,314      <br />12. FOX News 4,001      <br />13. The Boston Globe 3,838      <br />14. USA Today 3,619      <br />15. Daily Mail 3,530      <br />16. Time 3,524      <br />17. BBC News 3,399      <br />18. NPR 3,189      <br />19. NY Daily News 2,588      <br />20. Forbes 2,534      <br />21. San Francisco Chronicle 2,420      <br />22. Slate 2,187      <br />23. CBS News 2,156      <br />24. Google News 2,093      <br />25. Wired 2,062      <br />26. Financial Times 2,056      <br />27. PBS 2,053      <br />28. NY Post 2,025      <br />29. San Francisco Examiner 1,968      <br />30. BusinessWeek 1,949      <br />31. The White House 1,929      <br />32. Salon 1,928      <br />33. Chicago Tribune 1,924      <br />34. Newsweek 1,880      <br />35. CNNMoney 1,712      <br />36. CBC 1,696      <br />37. Yahoo! Finance 1,642      <br />38. The Economist 1,565      <br />39. New York Magazine 1,550      <br />40. philly.com 1,288      <br />41. The Houston Chronicle 1,120      <br />42. Science Daily 1,093      <br />43. MarketWatch 1,076      <br />44. People 1,066      <br />45. Miami Herald 1,049      <br />46. The Seattle Times 1,049      <br />47. Yahoo! Sports 1,047      <br />48. The Dallas Morning News 939      <br />49. San Jose Mercury News 879      <br />50. Star Tribune 877</p>
</blockquote>
<p>These are the top mover and shakers of the Technorati service, and where even a really a year a go you could still find some of the big name tech bloggers it would seem that those day’s are long gone.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.inquisitr.com/24111/technorati-the-little-service-that-couldnt/">Technorati, the little service that couldn&rsquo;t</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.inquisitr.com">The Inquisitr</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.inquisitr.com/24111/technorati-the-little-service-that-couldnt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
	
		<media:thumbnail url="http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/technoratibutton.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/technoratibutton.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">technorati-button</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

