<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Inquisitr &#187; phishing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.inquisitr.com/tag/phishing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.inquisitr.com</link>
	<description>The Better Mix</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 20:19:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Phishing sites found to be hanging out on Google Docs</title>
		<link>http://www.inquisitr.com/110113/phishing-sites-found-to-be-hanging-out-on-google-docs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.inquisitr.com/110113/phishing-sites-found-to-be-hanging-out-on-google-docs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2011 17:15:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven Hodson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google docs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inquisitr.com/?p=110113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />There is an automatic assumption that when you see a link with the google.com domain in the address that you are dealing with a safe and secure site but according to a report from security researchers at F-Secure you might want to reconsider that preception. They have found that nestled quite comfortably at Google Docs [...]<p><a href="http://www.inquisitr.com/110113/phishing-sites-found-to-be-hanging-out-on-google-docs/">Phishing sites found to be hanging out on Google Docs</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.inquisitr.com">The Inquisitr</a></p>
<br /><br /><br />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-110118" title="google_doc_phishing" src="http://images.inquisitr.com/wp-content/2011/05/google_doc_phishing.png" alt="" width="465" height="236" /></p>
<p>There is an automatic assumption that when you see a link with the google.com domain in the address that you are dealing with a safe and secure site but according to a report from security researchers at F-Secure you might want to reconsider that preception.</p>
<p>They have found that nestled quite comfortably at Google Docs a number of phishing sites that are extremely well done to the point that they are still unsure about one of the sites that they have found.</p>
<p>The problem with this is that by inserting themselves on Google Docs these phishing sites are able to by-pass your browsers normal ability to detect, and protect you, from these nasties. This is because the Google domains provide a valid SSL (secure sockets layer) certificate which the browser uses to be able to tell, and notify us, that you are on a secure site.</p>
<blockquote><p>While researching the many examples of Docs-hosted phishing sites, the F-Secure researchers came across this form (see below), which asks for your Google Voice number, email address and the secret PIN code on your account. It appears to be a phishing site, but oddly, at least one Google employee was found to have linked to the form on online Help forums.</p>
<p>This stumped the researchers, who then turned to Twitter to ask their followers what they thought.<a href="http://twitter.com/#!/mikkohypponen/status/75149600163512320">Tweets</a> Mikko H. Hypponen, F-Secure&#8217;s CRO:</p>
<p>&#8220;The consensus on Twitter seems to be that the weird page on google.com is a phishing site. The jury&#8217;s still out though.&#8221;</p>
<p>Writes one <a href="http://www.f-secure.com/weblog/archives/comments.html?PostID=00002168">commenter</a> on the original blog post: &#8220;I must say kudos to Google for anonymizing so well the form, there&#8217;s no way to tell who made it.&#8221; Uh-oh, Google.</p>
<p>via <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/Google_docs_found_hosting_phishing_sites.php">ReadWriteWeb</a></p></blockquote>
<p>Uh-oh is right.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.inquisitr.com/110113/phishing-sites-found-to-be-hanging-out-on-google-docs/">Phishing sites found to be hanging out on Google Docs</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.inquisitr.com">The Inquisitr</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.inquisitr.com/110113/phishing-sites-found-to-be-hanging-out-on-google-docs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:thumbnail url="http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/2011/05/google_doc_phishing-100x100.png" />
		<media:content url="http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/2011/05/google_doc_phishing.png" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">google_doc_phishing</media:title>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/2011/05/google_doc_phishing-100x100.png" />
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>WARNING: A new Twitter phishing attack</title>
		<link>http://www.inquisitr.com/72165/warning-a-new-twitter-phishing-attack/</link>
		<comments>http://www.inquisitr.com/72165/warning-a-new-twitter-phishing-attack/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 19:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven Hodson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inquisitr.com/?p=72165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />Okay I&#8217;m not totally sure if this is absolutely new, as in the last 24 hours, or not but I figured that better to be safe than sorry eh. I just got the following email in my inbox and as you can see it looks pretty legit The only problem is that when you click [...]<p><a href="http://www.inquisitr.com/72165/warning-a-new-twitter-phishing-attack/">WARNING: A new Twitter phishing attack</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.inquisitr.com">The Inquisitr</a></p>
<br /><br /><br />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay I&#8217;m not totally sure if this is absolutely new, as in the last 24 hours, or not but I figured that better to be safe than sorry eh.</p>
<p>I just got the following email in my inbox and as you can see it looks pretty legit</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-72166" title="twitter_phishing" src="http://images.inquisitr.com/wp-content/2010/05/twitter_phishing.png" alt="" width="526" height="414" /></p>
<p>The only problem is that when you click the link you end up being sent to a non-Twitter page at</p>
<p>h ttp://forum.tabrizchat.eclick.ir/lumps.html</p>
<p>Now normally I wouldn&#8217;t even give this a second thought as the address it was sent to wasn&#8217;t one that I had listed with Twitter but I had just blocked and reported some-one on Twitter so for some reason (I&#8217;m blaming lack of coffee) I decided to click the link.</p>
<p>DUMB.</p>
<p>When I saw the actual address show up in Chrome&#8217;s address bar I immediately closed the window so I don&#8217;t know exactly what is on the other end of the link but it probably isn&#8217;t good.</p>
<p>If this has already been passed around my apologies but like I said &#8211; better safe than sorry.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.inquisitr.com/72165/warning-a-new-twitter-phishing-attack/">WARNING: A new Twitter phishing attack</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.inquisitr.com">The Inquisitr</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.inquisitr.com/72165/warning-a-new-twitter-phishing-attack/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:thumbnail url="http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/2010/05/twitter_phishing-100x100.png" />
		<media:content url="http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/2010/05/twitter_phishing.png" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">twitter_phishing</media:title>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/2010/05/twitter_phishing-100x100.png" />
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Not so fast with the Hotmail jokes- additional 20K addresses compromised on GMail, AOL, Earthlink</title>
		<link>http://www.inquisitr.com/41031/not-so-fast-with-the-hotmail-jokes-additional-20k-addresses-compromised-on-gmail-aol-earthlink/</link>
		<comments>http://www.inquisitr.com/41031/not-so-fast-with-the-hotmail-jokes-additional-20k-addresses-compromised-on-gmail-aol-earthlink/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 16:23:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kim LaCapria</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gmail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gmail passwords posted]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hotmail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[msn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[passwords leaked]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows live]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows live mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows live passwords leaked]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inquisitr.com/?p=41031</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />Yesterday, when it was revealed that tens of thousands of Hotmail addresses and passwords were posted on a code-sharing site, everyone had a bit of a go at the remaining Hotmail users who haven&#8217;t abandoned the service for a cooler GMail account. But a second posting followed, with a list of Hotmail, Yahoo, AOL, Gmail, [...]<p><a href="http://www.inquisitr.com/41031/not-so-fast-with-the-hotmail-jokes-additional-20k-addresses-compromised-on-gmail-aol-earthlink/">Not so fast with the Hotmail jokes- additional 20K addresses compromised on GMail, AOL, Earthlink</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.inquisitr.com">The Inquisitr</a></p>
<br /><br /><br />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-41032" title="phishing" src="http://images.inquisitr.com/wp-content/2009/10/phishing.jpg" alt="phishing" width="250" height="285" /></p>
<p>Yesterday, <a href="http://www.inquisitr.com/40789/10000-phished-passwords-from-hotmail-com-msn-com-and-live-com-accounts-posted-on-internet/">when it was revealed that tens of thousands of Hotmail addresses and passwords were posted on a code-sharing site</a>, everyone had a bit of a go at the remaining Hotmail users who haven&#8217;t abandoned the service for a cooler GMail account.</p>
<p>But a second posting followed, with a list of Hotmail, Yahoo, AOL, Gmail, Comcast and Earthlink addresses. Collected as part of a phishing scam, <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/8292928.stm">the BBC reports that while some of the addresses are old, expired or invalid, several are confirmed as genuine</a>. The lists are still accessible.</p>
<p>The BBC also reports that an estimated 40% of internet users have a <a href="http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Life%20Password&amp;defid=3971376">life password, an inadvisable practice</a> that simplifies logging in but leaves accounts much more open to hacking. Carol Theriault, of security firm Saphos, indicated that scams such as the one used to gather the e-mail addresses are growing increasingly slick and more difficult to detect:</p>
<blockquote>
<p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 10px; padding-left: 0px; outline-width: 0px; outline-style: initial; outline-color: initial; font-size: 13px; margin: 0px;">&#8220;Phishing attacks are very subtle these days,&#8221; she said. &#8220;People do all kinds of tricky things.&#8221;</p>
<p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 10px; padding-left: 0px; outline-width: 0px; outline-style: initial; outline-color: initial; font-size: 13px; margin: 0px;">Fake websites, which ask for a users login details, can be made to look like those of reputable companies.</p>
<p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 10px; padding-left: 0px; outline-width: 0px; outline-style: initial; outline-color: initial; font-size: 13px; margin: 0px;">&#8220;This should be a wake-up call to Google and Microsoft to educate their users,&#8221; said Ms Theriault.</p>
</blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.inquisitr.com/41031/not-so-fast-with-the-hotmail-jokes-additional-20k-addresses-compromised-on-gmail-aol-earthlink/">Not so fast with the Hotmail jokes- additional 20K addresses compromised on GMail, AOL, Earthlink</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.inquisitr.com">The Inquisitr</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.inquisitr.com/41031/not-so-fast-with-the-hotmail-jokes-additional-20k-addresses-compromised-on-gmail-aol-earthlink/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:thumbnail url="http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/2009/10/phishing-150x150.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/2009/10/phishing.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">phishing</media:title>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/2009/10/phishing-150x150.jpg" />
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gmail Amps Up Phishing Protection</title>
		<link>http://www.inquisitr.com/1529/gmail-amps-up-phishing-protection/</link>
		<comments>http://www.inquisitr.com/1529/gmail-amps-up-phishing-protection/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 15:31:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JR</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dkim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domainkeys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ebay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gmail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paypal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phishing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inquisitr.com/?p=1529</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />Google is teaming up with eBay and Paypal to help protect Gmail users from phishing scams. The web-based mail service will now authenticate any e-mails coming from paypal.com or ebay.com. The move is an effort to combat the large number of spoofed messages that appear to originate from those domains. Now, any e-mails claiming to [...]<p><a href="http://www.inquisitr.com/1529/gmail-amps-up-phishing-protection/">Gmail Amps Up Phishing Protection</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.inquisitr.com">The Inquisitr</a></p>
<br /><br /><br />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src='http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/gmail.jpg' alt='' class='alignright' />Google is teaming up with eBay and Paypal to <a href="http://gmailblog.blogspot.com/2008/07/fighting-phishing-with-ebay-and-paypal.html">help protect Gmail users</a> from phishing scams.</p>
<p>The web-based mail service will now authenticate any e-mails coming from paypal.com or ebay.com.  The move is an effort to combat the large number of spoofed messages that appear to originate from those domains.  Now, any e-mails claiming to come from Paypal or eBay that don&#8217;t check out won&#8217;t even make it into your inbox.</p>
<p>The authentication process will use DomainKeys and DKIM technology to confirm legit messages.  Google says it&#8217;s been testing the process for a few weeks already.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.inquisitr.com/1529/gmail-amps-up-phishing-protection/">Gmail Amps Up Phishing Protection</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.inquisitr.com">The Inquisitr</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.inquisitr.com/1529/gmail-amps-up-phishing-protection/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:thumbnail url="http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/gmail.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/gmail.jpg" medium="image" />
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

