<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Inquisitr &#187; music sharing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.inquisitr.com/tag/music-sharing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.inquisitr.com</link>
	<description>The Better Mix</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 00:26:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Last.fm again denies snitching on us, CBS disses blogs</title>
		<link>http://www.inquisitr.com/25037/lastfm-again-denies-snitching-on-us-cbs-disses-blogs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.inquisitr.com/25037/lastfm-again-denies-snitching-on-us-cbs-disses-blogs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 23:32:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kim LaCapria</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[denials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[last.fm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music sharing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[riaa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scrobbling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inquisitr.com/?p=25037</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />Sounding vaguely like a bunch of sleazy boyfriends, Last.fm &#38; CBS want us to know that baby, they really, really didn&#8217;t have anything going on with the RIAA. And all that scrobbling, that was ours and it meant something and they would never, ever share it with someone who might sue us or our tweens [...]<p><a href="http://www.inquisitr.com/25037/lastfm-again-denies-snitching-on-us-cbs-disses-blogs/">Last.fm again denies snitching on us, CBS disses blogs</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.inquisitr.com">The Inquisitr</a></p>
<br /><br /><br />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-25047" title="lastfm1" src="http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/lastfm1-300x161.png" alt="lastfm1" width="300" height="161" /></p>
<p>Sounding vaguely like a bunch of sleazy boyfriends, Last.fm &amp; CBS want us to know that baby, they really, really didn&#8217;t have anything going on with the RIAA. And all that scrobbling, that was <em>ours</em> and it <em>meant something</em> and they would <em>never, ever </em>share it with someone who might sue us or our tweens for many thousands of dollars.</p>
<p>The debacle began when Universal Music Australia <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_Line_on_the_Horizon#Release" target="_blank">accidentally leaked tracks</a> from the then-unreleased U2 album <em>No Line on the Horizon. </em>At the time, rumors flew across the blogosphere that the RIAA was demanding (and receiving) scrobbling data from Last.fm to grass up P2P hooligans (with questionable taste in old-dude rock.)</p>
<p>When allegations of data sharing between Last.fm, parent company CBS and the RIAA were <a href="http://arstechnica.com/media/news/2009/02/riaa-denies-rumors-that-lastfm-turned-over-data.ars" target="_blank">first raised in February</a>, denials were issued all around to anyone who would listen- infused with outrage that we would even suspect such a thing. True or not, it kind of reminded everyone that a lot of what we send out into the internet ether could land up somewhere, stick, and come back to bite us on the ass someday.</p>
<p>The story resurfaced this week after a blog previously accused of fabricating Last.fm stories went for a second round. In response, CBS <a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2009/06/lastfmriaa-drama-round-2-denials-denials-denials.ars" target="_blank">issued yet another statement</a> to <em>Ars Technica</em> yesterday denying any and all canoodling with the RIAA. And the RIAA backed up their alleged BFF CBS, as rep Cara Duckworth coyly told <em>Ars </em>that  &#8221;we&#8217;ve made no such request for this information.&#8221; (Hmmm&#8230; that&#8217;s kind of&#8230; <em>vague.</em>)</p>
<p>And charmingly, CBS had this to say to the <em><a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2009/05/26/lastfm-denies-data-sharing-accusations-again/" target="_blank">Wall Street Journal</a></em><a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2009/05/26/lastfm-denies-data-sharing-accusations-again/" target="_blank">&#8216;s Tech Blog</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8230;those who consult such blogs should be aware of the standard by which such postings are sourced and published.</p></blockquote>
<p>Because we all know the best way to get bloggers to trust and believe you is to attack their credibility.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.inquisitr.com/25037/lastfm-again-denies-snitching-on-us-cbs-disses-blogs/">Last.fm again denies snitching on us, CBS disses blogs</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.inquisitr.com">The Inquisitr</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.inquisitr.com/25037/lastfm-again-denies-snitching-on-us-cbs-disses-blogs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:thumbnail url="http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/lastfm1-150x150.png" />
		<media:content url="http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/lastfm1.png" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">lastfm1</media:title>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/lastfm1-150x150.png" />
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Napster Sale Could Be In The Works</title>
		<link>http://www.inquisitr.com/2748/napster-sale-could-be-in-the-works/</link>
		<comments>http://www.inquisitr.com/2748/napster-sale-could-be-in-the-works/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 15:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JR</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music sharing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[napster]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inquisitr.com/?p=2748</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />Poor old Napster may be back on the auction block again before long. Execs told shareholders via e-mail Friday they may be positioning the company for &#8220;strategic alternatives&#8221; to its current public status. The company&#8217;s board is currently in a state of turmoil. A few activists are trying to run for leadership spots, claiming that [...]<p><a href="http://www.inquisitr.com/2748/napster-sale-could-be-in-the-works/">Napster Sale Could Be In The Works</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.inquisitr.com">The Inquisitr</a></p>
<br /><br /><br />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/napster.jpg" alt='' class="alignright" />Poor old Napster may be back on the auction block again before long.  Execs told shareholders via e-mail Friday they may be <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-10028863-93.html?part=rss&#038;subj=news&#038;tag=2547-1_3-0-5">positioning the company for &#8220;strategic alternatives&#8221;</a> to its current public status.</p>
<p>The company&#8217;s board is currently in a state of turmoil.  A few activists are trying to run for leadership spots, claiming that the current management isn&#8217;t willing to consider a sale and that they would turn things around.  Gee, this all sounds <a href="http://www.inquisitr.com/1834/plea-to-yahoo-shut-up-and-sell-yourself-already/">awfully familiar</a>&#8230;</p>
<p>In any event, Napster brings back fond memories.  Its initial incarnation was a huge step in online filesharing &#8212; and, regardless of what <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lars_Ulrich">tiny Danish drummers</a> may think, it opened up the Internet in an exciting new way.  Now, though, it&#8217;s hard to imagine the site seeing anything in the way of huge success against the music downloading competition.  </p>
<p>Poor, poor Napster.  We miss our old friend.</p>
<div class="tradevibes_linkdiv"><a class="tradevibes_show_widget" href="http://venturebeatprofiles.com//company/profile/napster">Napster</a></div>
<p><script language="JavaScript" type="text/javascript" src="http://qbase.tradevibes.com/widget/napster"></script></p>
<p><a href="http://www.inquisitr.com/2748/napster-sale-could-be-in-the-works/">Napster Sale Could Be In The Works</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.inquisitr.com">The Inquisitr</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.inquisitr.com/2748/napster-sale-could-be-in-the-works/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:thumbnail url="http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/napster.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/napster.jpg" medium="image" />
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

