<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Inquisitr &#187; memphis police</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.inquisitr.com/tag/memphis-police/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.inquisitr.com</link>
	<description>The Better Mix</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 22:05:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Bloggers&#8217; Protection Being Put to the Test</title>
		<link>http://www.inquisitr.com/1904/bloggers-protection-being-put-to-the-test/</link>
		<comments>http://www.inquisitr.com/1904/bloggers-protection-being-put-to-the-test/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 14:50:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JR</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[american civil liberties union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anonymous speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bloggers rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memphis police]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inquisitr.com/?p=1904</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />A new legal proceeding could lay the groundwork for bloggers&#8217; rights &#8212; or lack thereof &#8212; when it comes to freedom of speech. The Memphis Police Department has filed a subpoena asking AOL to provide them the identity of the person or people behind the MPD Enforcer 2.0 blog, which is apparently hosted on AOL&#8217;s [...]<p><a href="http://www.inquisitr.com/1904/bloggers-protection-being-put-to-the-test/">Bloggers&#8217; Protection Being Put to the Test</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.inquisitr.com">The Inquisitr</a></p>
<br /><br /><br />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/gavel.jpg" alt="" title="gavel" width="200" height="139" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-1905" />A new legal proceeding could lay the groundwork for bloggers&#8217; rights &#8212; or lack thereof &#8212; when it comes to freedom of speech.</p>
<p>The Memphis Police Department has <a href="http://mpdenforcer20.blogspot.com/2008/07/larry-subpoenas-aol.html">filed a subpoena</a> asking AOL to provide them the identity of the person or people behind the <a href="http://mpdenforcer20.blogspot.com">MPD Enforcer 2.0</a> blog, which is apparently hosted on AOL&#8217;s servers.  The blog takes a critical look at the police department, in particular its leaders.</p>
<p>&#8220;It has been a common practice for the administration to cover up political incidents in an attempt to climb the ladder of power within the department,&#8221; the <a href="http://mpdenforcer20.blogspot.com/2008/07/what-does-mpd-have-to-hide.html">latest post</a>, written Wednesday, reads.</p>
<p>The blog has evidently become quite popular with police and the general public alike.  Though the police department has not given a specific reason for why it wants the bloggers&#8217; identities &#8212; currently known only as <a href="http://www.blogger.com/profile/12303949231769623502">the alias &#8220;Dirk Diggler&#8221;</a> &#8212; its request has gotten both the American Civil Liberties Union and the Electronic Privacy Information Center fired up.</p>
<p>&#8220;We are quite interested in preserving the anonymity of the bloggers,&#8221; ACLU Tennessee Executive Director Hedy Weinberg told the <a href="http://www.commercialappeal.com/news/2008/jul/22/police-director-sues-find-identity-blogger-critica/">Memphis Commercial Appeal</a>.  &#8220;Anonymous speech has long been protected speech under the First Amendment.&#8221; </p>
<p>The bloggers say they&#8217;ve <a href="http://mpdenforcer20.blogspot.com/2008/07/enforcer-has-selected-washington-dc.html">hired the Public Citizen Litigation Group</a> to represent them in the case.  AOL, however, has <a href="http://www.crime-research.org/news/2002/11/Mess0703.htm">lost a similar battle</a> to protect users&#8217; identities before: In 2001, a Japanese electronics company demanded the name of a user it said had posted &#8220;false, defamatory and otherwise unlawful messages&#8221; on a message board.  Despite AOL&#8217;s efforts to keep the information private, a Virginia Supreme Court ruled in the other company&#8217;s favor.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.inquisitr.com/1904/bloggers-protection-being-put-to-the-test/">Bloggers&#8217; Protection Being Put to the Test</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.inquisitr.com">The Inquisitr</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.inquisitr.com/1904/bloggers-protection-being-put-to-the-test/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:thumbnail url="http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/gavel.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/gavel.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">gavel</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

