<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Inquisitr &#187; guy kawasaki</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.inquisitr.com/tag/guy-kawasaki/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.inquisitr.com</link>
	<description>The Better Mix</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 02:23:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Alltop goes for the clean look</title>
		<link>http://www.inquisitr.com/38408/alltop-goes-for-the-clean-look/</link>
		<comments>http://www.inquisitr.com/38408/alltop-goes-for-the-clean-look/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 18:02:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven Hodson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aggregator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alltop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guy kawasaki]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inquisitr.com/38408/alltop-goes-for-the-clean-look/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />I just caught this via @chrisbrogan on Twitter but it looks like the “best of the web” aggregator Alltop has taken a new look live. According to the head guy at Alltop, Guy Kawasaki, and his post about the new look by Out:Think actually went live August 17. Here is a before and after shot [...]<p><a href="http://www.inquisitr.com/38408/alltop-goes-for-the-clean-look/">Alltop goes for the clean look</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.inquisitr.com">The Inquisitr</a></p>
<br /><br /><br />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><center><img style="border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; display: inline; border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px" title="alltop" border="0" alt="alltop" src="http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/alltop.png" width="495" height="143" /> </center>
<p>I just caught this <a title="Twitter" href="http://twitter.com/chrisbrogan/status/4127610490">via <a href="http://twitter.com/chrisbrogan">@chrisbrogan</a>  on Twitter</a> but it looks like the “best of the web” aggregator <a href="http://alltop.com/">Alltop</a> has taken a new look live. According to the head guy at Alltop, Guy Kawasaki, <a href="http://blog.guykawasaki.com/2009/08/extreme-makeover-alltop-blog.html#axzz0Rfd6sWfo">and his post about the new look</a> by <a href="http://outthinkgroup.com/">Out:Think</a> actually went live August 17.</p>
<p>Here is a before and after shot courtesy of the team at Out:Think</p>
<p><img style="border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; display: block; float: none; margin-left: auto; border-top: 0px; margin-right: auto; border-right: 0px" title="Click for full view" border="0" alt="Click for full view" src="http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/alltopblogbeforeandafter.jpg" width="504" height="196" /> </p>
</p>
<p>I kind of like the new look but then I’m a big fan of the clean and simple look.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.inquisitr.com/38408/alltop-goes-for-the-clean-look/">Alltop goes for the clean look</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.inquisitr.com">The Inquisitr</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.inquisitr.com/38408/alltop-goes-for-the-clean-look/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:thumbnail url="http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/alltop.png" />
		<media:content url="http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/alltop.png" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">alltop</media:title>
		</media:content>
		<media:content url="http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/alltopblogbeforeandafter.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Click for full view</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Way to go Guy Kawasaki, thanks for the malware tweet</title>
		<link>http://www.inquisitr.com/27252/way-to-go-guy-kawasaki-thanks-for-the-malware-tweet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.inquisitr.com/27252/way-to-go-guy-kawasaki-thanks-for-the-malware-tweet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 01:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven Hodson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guy kawasaki]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inquisitr.com/27252/way-to-go-guy-kawasaki-thanks-for-the-malware-tweet/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />Wow, makes me almost glad that I don’t follow Mr. Kawasaki on Twitter, unlike Guy’s other 139,000 followers who were left open to a possible malware threat from one of his automated tweets. According to the report on CNet News Security blog a Twitter message sent by Kawasaki advertised a sexy video of TV star [...]<p><a href="http://www.inquisitr.com/27252/way-to-go-guy-kawasaki-thanks-for-the-malware-tweet/">Way to go Guy Kawasaki, thanks for the malware tweet</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.inquisitr.com">The Inquisitr</a></p>
<br /><br /><br />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img title="kawasakispam" src="http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/kawasakispam.jpg" border="0" alt="kawasakispam" width="474" height="212" /></p>
<p>Wow, makes me almost glad that I don’t follow Mr. Kawasaki on <a title="Twitter" href="http://twitter.com">Twitter</a>, unlike Guy’s other 139,000 followers who were left open to a possible malware threat from one of his automated tweets. <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-10272457-83.html?part=rss&amp;tag=feed&amp;subj=News-Security">According to the report on CNet News Security blog</a> a Twitter message sent by Kawasaki advertised a sexy video of TV star Leighton Meester of Gossip Girl. The problem was that if you clicked on the link and then tried to view the video you would find yourself the proud owner of a trojan.</p>
<p>Under the guise of needing to install a required codec to view the video, Kawasaki fans would instead download and install <a href="http://www.sophos.com/security/analyses/viruses-and-spyware/osxjahlavc.html">OSX/Jahlav-C for the Mac</a>. Kawasaki has stated that his account is set up to redistribute <strike>spam</strike> updates from user generated news site NowPublic.</p>
<p>While Kawasaki’s account wasn’t the only one to send out the message (it also went out on less popular accounts), Guy&#8217;s popularity on Twitter means many of his messages are ReTweeted, resulting in even further promotion of the malware.</p>
<p>But then again it was a trojan for Macs and we all know there is no such thing so I guess this isn’t really that important so go ahead and carry on with what you were doing …………….</p>
<p><a href="http://www.inquisitr.com/27252/way-to-go-guy-kawasaki-thanks-for-the-malware-tweet/">Way to go Guy Kawasaki, thanks for the malware tweet</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.inquisitr.com">The Inquisitr</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.inquisitr.com/27252/way-to-go-guy-kawasaki-thanks-for-the-malware-tweet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:thumbnail url="http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/kawasakispam.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/kawasakispam.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">kawasakispam</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter fail: the rise of the ghostwriters</title>
		<link>http://www.inquisitr.com/20801/twitter-fail-the-rise-of-the-ghostwriters/</link>
		<comments>http://www.inquisitr.com/20801/twitter-fail-the-rise-of-the-ghostwriters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 01:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Duncan Riley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guy kawasaki]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inquisitr.com/?p=20801</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />“If I am going to speak, it will come from me. It’s 140 characters. It’s so few characters. If you need a ghostwriter for that, I feel sorry for you.” Shaquille O’Neal. Twitter is the hot social service networking this year, but how social is it really? We&#8217;ll if your an ex-Apple executive and VC [...]<p><a href="http://www.inquisitr.com/20801/twitter-fail-the-rise-of-the-ghostwriters/">Twitter fail: the rise of the ghostwriters</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.inquisitr.com">The Inquisitr</a></p>
<br /><br /><br />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-20802" title="guy-kawasaki-grade-a-tool" src="http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/guy-kawasaki-grade-a-tool.jpg" alt="guy-kawasaki-grade-a-tool" width="500" height="295" /></p>
<p><em>“If I am going to speak, it will come from me. It’s 140 characters. It’s so few characters. If you need a ghostwriter for that, <strong>I feel sorry for you.</strong>” Shaquille O’Neal.</em></p>
<p>Twitter is <em>the</em> hot social service networking this year, but how social is it really? We&#8217;ll if your an ex-Apple executive and VC by the name of Guy Kawasaki, it&#8217;s apparently not all that social, because it&#8217;s a marketing tool that is best complimented with ghostwriters</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Why does it matter who is doing the tweeting? Either the content is good or not good. I’d rather follow a smart intern tweeting for a CEO than an dumb CEO tweeting for himself or herself. Twitter is great that way: Everybody, no matter who they are, gets 140 characters. Then you have to earn your followers and keep earning their allegiance with every tweet.&#8221; Guy Kawasaki</p></blockquote>
<p>The problem here is that Kawasaki sees Twitter as a content platform vs a social networking platform. Stowe Boyd: &#8220;Connectedness is king: it&#8217;s social media, right? The social is supposed to equate to real live human beings communicating with each other. Not &#8216;bots, and ghosts, and things that go bump in the night.&#8221;</p>
<p>The New York Times deals with who is using, and not using ghostwriters <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/27/technology/internet/27twitter.html?_r=3&amp;hp">here</a>.</p>
<p>To quote someone who DM&#8217;d me about this yesterday (not sure if I can disclose the name) &#8220;why follow guy when we don&#8217;t even know when its really him?&#8221;</p>
<p>Why indeed.</p>
<p>If it&#8217;s good enough for Lance Armstrong, Shaq or Ashton Kutcher to use Twitter directly, why not an ex-Apple executive?</p>
<p>I&#8217;d also rather see a poorly written Tweet from a company CEO or celebrity than a polished ghostwritten one if that tweet reflected a real connection, not a canned response. Celebrities are using Twitter to communicate directly with fans, cutting out the middle man and making real connections, but for some, once a tool, always a Twitter fail.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.inquisitr.com/20801/twitter-fail-the-rise-of-the-ghostwriters/">Twitter fail: the rise of the ghostwriters</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.inquisitr.com">The Inquisitr</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.inquisitr.com/20801/twitter-fail-the-rise-of-the-ghostwriters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
	
		<media:thumbnail url="http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/guy-kawasaki-grade-a-tool-150x150.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/guy-kawasaki-grade-a-tool.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">guy-kawasaki-grade-a-tool</media:title>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/guy-kawasaki-grade-a-tool-150x150.jpg" />
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

