The Inquisitr » fail blog

For eyelash use only!

Kim LaCapria — Tue, 22 Sep 2009 18:20:44 +0000

File under “sex sells.”

[Via Failblog]

Pantry stocking fail

Kim LaCapria — Fri, 04 Sep 2009 17:56:37 +0000

Look, there’s a dishwasher and ample shelving for… oh.

[FAIL Blog]

Stopping for gas fail

Kim LaCapria — Tue, 25 Aug 2009 17:18:17 +0000

Now I’ll feel like less of an idiot when I forget to close that little latchy door thing.

[Source: Fail Blog]

Summer Fun Fail

Kim LaCapria — Tue, 21 Jul 2009 17:42:13 +0000

Could have been worse- at least her arse is covered.

[Image: FAIL Blog]

Real estate fail?

Kim LaCapria — Thu, 16 Jul 2009 13:26:15 +0000

Or win, depending on your shopping criteria.

[Source: FAIL blog]

FAIL Blog to Guinness Book: Welcome teh internets. Please RTFM.

Kim LaCapria — Mon, 13 Jul 2009 22:07:10 +0000

Last week, FAIL blog pointed out that there was a world record for “Most Individuals Killed In A Terrorist Act” occupied by 9/11.

What’s more, this record had a page that encouraged someone to “break this record.” *facepalm* So FAIL blog made a fail out of it, and Guinness World Records Limited got their panties all in a twist. GWRL sent the standard “blogger, stand down” e-mail, to which FAIL blog responded with some epic win. The removed the pic- sort of- but in a way that ensures the outcome is way less desireable for GWRL, and guarantees more people will know a) that it happened and b) that GWRL are “douchebaggy cyber-bullies.”

Well played, FAIL blog. Full text (and pic) of the anti-apology:

Dear Sir/Madam,

Thanks for writing us an email regarding the “Record Breaking Fail”. Unfortunately, douchebaggy cyber-bullying emails will only bring upon you more shame on your house. I am also resisting the urge to write this email in ALL CAPS.

I believe it is the duty of FAIL Blog(TM) to call out organizations when they encourage the public to do such things as “Break the record” for the “Most Individuals Killed In A Terrorist Act”. We firmly believe that our publication of your fail is protected under the concepts of fair use, commentary and non-trademark use. Please RTFM and we welcome you to teh interwebs.

Since we at FAIL Blog(TM) don’t have a legal defense department, we have complied with your request to remove the trademarked term and logo from the original image. We have used the “naughty bits filter” on the image to secure your naughty, naughty, trademark assertions. However, we have posted your email so that our audience can see why we had to remove the name of the failer from the image. I hope that this is the outcome you have expected as now NO ONE WILL EVER KNOW THAT GUINNESS WORLD RECORDS LIMITED HAS FAILED.

The full legal response can be read here: icanhaz.com/legalresponse

Cheers,
FAIL Blog

Hee, hee.

[Source: FAIL blog]

Greed vs the greater good: the growing trend of blogs reposting videos as their own

Duncan Riley — Wed, 01 Oct 2008 02:10:01 +0000

One of the foundations of blogging has been sharing: we share links, we share stories with credit, we may repost an image or video. To date, the system has worked well, but there’s a new trend that replaces the notion of sharing with greed; a greed for traffic and a greed for attention.

We can’t embed an image from another site, so the expected norm has been a system of crediting images used. But video was different. YouTube popularized embedding video, so that instead of having to take a local copy and upload the video to present it on your own site, adding a video became an embed code away. The original uploader wins because they get more views on their video, and where appropriate a link back to their site, and bloggers get to show the video quickly and without any hassles. But things are changing. There’s a growing trend to rip a video and upload it as your own, complete with site branding.

I first noticed the trend on the Fail Blog, from the guys behind icanhascheezburger.com. Here’s an example of a video on the front page today. Note that this isn’t their video, but they’ve uploaded it to their own account and added failblog.org branding to it (and other times the branding includes “as seen on failblog.org).

I sat through a presentation from owner Ben Huh at Gnomedex in August (video can be viewed in this post) and I wanted to ask a question about why they were reuploading videos like this, but I didn’t get the chance. Huh was asked though about copyright, given that most images and videos on the site come from external sources, and all he said in response (and this is for memory) that they don’t have a problem with copyright 95% of the time, but they do act on any complaints when they come in. I’d note also that although Failblog credits the reader who submitted the video, they do so without a link to either the submitter, or the original source for the video.

Political sites join in

Failblog isn’t alone in this practice, although it was the first time I saw it. The trend has spread to political blogs as well, and sites that have started using the practice include TPM and to a lesser extent The Huffington Post. The Huff Post tends to vary between official content providers and its own uploaded content, and we can’t be sure whether they’re ripping video and reuploading it, or some of the video they captured themselves (and there are special mixes as well unique to the site), but TPM’s YouTube channel is full of TPM branded content available elsewhere, including directly from original content providers.

This isn’t an exhaustive list by any stretch, but it’s sites I’ve seen recently, and I’d bet others are doing the same thing as well.

The economics of reposting

The reasoning behind this trend is very simple: numbers, traffic and attention. By reposting this content to their own channels (say on YouTube), sites such as the Failblog build a stronger following through the branding in the videos, and by creating a popular YouTube channel that feeds back to the site. The presumption would hold true for TPM as well: a one stop shop of interesting politics videos, branded, creating a superior destination that drives more traffic and attention.

RedLasso

RedLasso isn’t to blame here, but the trend on political sites to post content uploaded to their own accounts as opposed to grabbing it from other sources seems to have come about in part due to RedLasso no longer being available with an ample selection of clips. The vacuum of content has been replaced by aggressive site specific uploads, particularly where no legal alternative exists. This particularly holds true for the Huffington Post, who switch between their own video and embeds provided legally by content owners such as MSNBC.

Copyright

The interesting thing about the rise of reposting videos is the copyright risk each site takes on when doing it. With traditional YouTube style embeds, the video is embedded from someone else, so if there is a copyright claim, it goes to the person who uploaded the video originally. By reposting this content on their own accounts, the copyright claim falls to the site itself, either directly or via the video host, so the risk to the site itself increases. Failblog is on shakier ground, because nothing they repost is their own, however the likelihood of that content attracting copyright attention is less due to the nature of the content itself. TPM, The Huffington Post and others face higher exposure to copyright claims as the reuploaded videos are normally exclusively taken from television broadcasts. They do have a fair use defense that may well stand up well in court, but the exposure is exponentially higher than before where many of these sites would have run RedLasso content. It’s really rolling the dice on copyright, and hoping that you’ll always get the result you’re after; worth it perhaps given the benefits of reposting the content, but a higher risk than the alternatives.

Conclusion

I’m torn on this trend. I dislike the idea that some sites are so greedy that they feel the need to rip and reupload content as their own, where as in the past blogs would have shared the love, and simply embedded content from the source. It’s a negative trend that goes against some of the underlying sharing principles that have helped the blogosphere grow.

However, I get the economics, and I understand why sites are doing this. I also couldn’t rule out doing something similar in the future, because the numbers case is that strong in favor of doing so. The main reason why I’m not about to start now, and I’m unlikely to do so in the future isn’t just moral (although the moral case is strong), it’s one of ease of use. It’s not super easy or quick to rip a video, brand it, and reupload it as your own (coupled with the fact that upload speeds in Australia make uploading video slower again), where as it’s always far easier to grab an embed code and run the video that way. I’m a touch lazy, and I’m time poor, so embedding wins over reposting.

Overall, this is a trend that deserves great discussion and attention. It may be another sign of the maturity of the blogosphere, that now we’ve past the peak, and money drives the topsites, that some will forgo sharing for an extra edge.