<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Inquisitr &#187; celebrity bloggers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.inquisitr.com/tag/celebrity-bloggers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.inquisitr.com</link>
	<description>The Better Mix</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 22:01:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>FTC admits celebrities can blog for freebies, no disclosure needed</title>
		<link>http://www.inquisitr.com/55857/celebrities-exempt-from-ftc-blogging-rules/</link>
		<comments>http://www.inquisitr.com/55857/celebrities-exempt-from-ftc-blogging-rules/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 22:49:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kim LaCapria</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bloggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[celebrity bloggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ftc to fine bloggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[goop gwyneth paltrow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gwyneth paltrow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[old media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unfair advantages]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inquisitr.com/?p=55857</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />The FTC has hinted in an interview with Daily Finance that the rules about fairly disclosing comps in blog posts doesn&#8217;t apply to people who happen to be awash in a sea of free goodies. Yes, you, poor mommy blogger, must disclose a sample of baby wipes you didn&#8217;t pay for, but people who are [...]<p><a href="http://www.inquisitr.com/55857/celebrities-exempt-from-ftc-blogging-rules/">FTC admits celebrities can blog for freebies, no disclosure needed</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.inquisitr.com">The Inquisitr</a></p>
<br /><br /><br />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-55858" href="http://www.inquisitr.com/55857/celebrities-exempt-from-ftc-blogging-rules/gwyneth-paltrow-2/"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-55858" title="gwyneth paltrow" src="http://images.inquisitr.com/wp-content/2010/01/gwyneth-paltrow.jpg" alt="" width="336" height="400" /></a></p>
<p>The FTC has hinted in <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/story/how-the-ftcs-endorsement-rules-unfairly-favor-celebrities/19305508/">an interview with Daily Finance</a> that the <a href="http://www.inquisitr.com/41114/my-ftc-disclosure-and-have-you-done-yours-yet/">rules about fairly disclosing comps in blog posts</a> doesn&#8217;t apply to people who happen to be awash in a sea of free goodies.</p>
<p>Yes, you, poor mommy blogger, must disclose a sample of baby wipes you didn&#8217;t pay for, but people who are important and better than you like Gwyneth Paltrow deserve nice things and thusly don&#8217;t have to abide by FTC disclosure rules. While celebrity endorsement has way more pull than your average blogging nobody, details like that don&#8217;t matter much to the FTC- Rich Cleland, associate director of the Federal Trade Commission&#8217;s ad division, explains the spotty logic behind the favoritism:</p>
<blockquote><p>The average consumer, Cleland said, might well be aware that celebrities of Paltrow&#8217;s stature often receive free clothing, trips and other swag. &#8220;It is one of the issues where celebrity endorsements are a little different than person-on-the-street endorsements,&#8221; he said. &#8220;Would consumers understand that celebrities are always getting free stuff? It&#8217;s a factual question.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Back in October when the new rules became a blogging issue, <a href="http://www.inquisitr.com/41249/ftc-to-celebs-you-are-responsible-for-what-youre-hawking/">Steve suggested celebrities might be in trouble</a> considering the new guidelines, but we can all rest easy. People like Gwyneth Paltrow can continue trading their heavily weighted words for <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/story/media/gwyneth-paltrow-will-the-ftc-call-about-her-ridiculously-lavis/19285779">&#8220;ridiculously lavish&#8221; vacations</a>. Sadly, it seems the regulations do <a href="http://www.inquisitr.com/41069/is-the-ftc-being-used-to-marginalize-independent-bloggers/">only exist to marginalize independent bloggers</a>. Because unfair advantages <em>cannot </em>be allowed to stand.</p>
<p>[via <a href="http://gawker.com/5442890/gwyneth-paltrow-will-never-answer-for-her-e+crimes">Gawker</a>]</p>
<p><a href="http://www.inquisitr.com/55857/celebrities-exempt-from-ftc-blogging-rules/">FTC admits celebrities can blog for freebies, no disclosure needed</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.inquisitr.com">The Inquisitr</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.inquisitr.com/55857/celebrities-exempt-from-ftc-blogging-rules/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:thumbnail url="http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/2010/01/gwyneth-paltrow-100x100.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/2010/01/gwyneth-paltrow.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">gwyneth paltrow</media:title>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/2010/01/gwyneth-paltrow-100x100.jpg" />
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kanye West Is Lazy, Not Mad</title>
		<link>http://www.inquisitr.com/9457/kanye-west-is-lazy-not-mad/</link>
		<comments>http://www.inquisitr.com/9457/kanye-west-is-lazy-not-mad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 18:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Duncan Riley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Celebrity News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[celebrity bloggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kanye west]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inquisitr.com/?p=9457</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />Do you know when you get really tired of doing things like pressing the space bar, soyoujustdon&#8217;t, or maybe the shift key, so you leave everything in ALL CAPS? Me neither, but apparently Kanye West does! He took to his blog to inform us that he&#8217;s not angry, but he likes to hold the phone [...]<p><a href="http://www.inquisitr.com/9457/kanye-west-is-lazy-not-mad/">Kanye West Is Lazy, Not Mad</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.inquisitr.com">The Inquisitr</a></p>
<br /><br /><br />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/kanye_west_is_lazy_not_mad.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-9459" title="kanye_west_is_lazy_not_mad" src="http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/kanye_west_is_lazy_not_mad.jpg" alt="kanye_west_is_mad_not_lazy" width="404" height="299" /></a></div>
<p>Do you know when you get really tired of doing things like pressing the space bar, soyoujustdon&#8217;t, or maybe the shift key, so you leave everything in ALL CAPS? Me neither, but apparently Kanye West does! He took to his blog to inform us that he&#8217;s not angry, but he likes to hold the phone to one ear and type:</p>
<p>&#8220;SIDEBAR: I USE ALL CAPS CAUSE I&#8217;M LAZY NOT MAD. I TYPE WITH ONE HAND AND HOLD THE PHONE WITH THE OTHER.&#8221;</p>
<p>No bluetooth? No headset? I don&#8217;t believe it. Of course, there are other reasons for one-handed typing, but I&#8217;m not going to go <em>there</em>. I just think he finally realized that his blog etiquette sucks, and that he&#8217;s got to come up with a reason.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.inquisitr.com/9457/kanye-west-is-lazy-not-mad/">Kanye West Is Lazy, Not Mad</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.inquisitr.com">The Inquisitr</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.inquisitr.com/9457/kanye-west-is-lazy-not-mad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:thumbnail url="http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/kanye_west_is_lazy_not_mad.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/kanye_west_is_lazy_not_mad.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">kanye_west_is_lazy_not_mad</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kanye West whines about the paps on his blog</title>
		<link>http://www.inquisitr.com/8533/kanye-west-whines-about-the-paps-on-his-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.inquisitr.com/8533/kanye-west-whines-about-the-paps-on-his-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 05:28:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Duncan Riley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Celebrity News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arrest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[celebrity bloggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kanye west]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paparazzi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scuffle with paps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wanker]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inquisitr.com/?p=8533</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />There is nothing we love more than a celebrity who blogs. Kanye West has put a rant up on his blog about the paparazzi and his recent arrest. You can tell he wrote it because its all in caps and says things that even a PR rep wouldn&#8217;t try to get away with, stuff like, [...]<p><a href="http://www.inquisitr.com/8533/kanye-west-whines-about-the-paps-on-his-blog/">Kanye West whines about the paps on his blog</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.inquisitr.com">The Inquisitr</a></p>
<br /><br /><br />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/kanyewest.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-8540" title="kanyewest" src="http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/kanyewest.jpg" alt="" width="250" height="270" /></a>There is nothing we love more than a celebrity who blogs.  Kanye West has put a rant up on his blog about the paparazzi and his recent arrest.  You can tell he wrote it because its all in caps and says things that even a PR rep wouldn&#8217;t try to get away with, stuff like, I am not a celebrity, I am a regular guy who happens to be famous.</p>
<p>According to Kanye the paparazzi are delivering him a world of darkness, apparently his photos are only worth $1,000 each.</p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote><p>REGARDLESS OF HOW MUCH LIGHT I PUT OUT, THERE ARE PEOPLE WORKING JUST AS HARD TO ONLY DELIVER DARKNESS. IF YOU LISTEN TO MY MUSIC, HOW COULD I DELIVER SO MANY POSITIVE UPLIFTING MESSAGES AND BE THE MONSTER THAT THE MEDIA PAINTS. PAPARAZZI GIVE REAL PHOTOGRAPHERS A BAD NAME.  A PICTURE IS WORTH A THOUSAND WORDS, THEIRS ARE WORTH A THOUSAND DOLLARS&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>According to Kanye the paps killed <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">Kenny</span> Princess Diana and his recent arrest was just a publicity stunt.</p>
<blockquote><p>I AM PROTECTING MY PERSONAL SPACE SINCE THERE ARE NO LAWS TO PROTECT THAT FOR ME.</p>
<p>I PUT MY HAND UP TO THE CAMERA IN SELF DEFENSE!</p>
<p>HERE&#8217;S WHAT HAPPENED&#8230;WHEN I LEFT THE CLUB, I WAS ENCOUNTERED BY A THIRSTY PAPARAZZI AS USUAL. HE FELT HE HAD MORE RIGHTS TO MY SPACE THAN ME, SO I PUT MY HAND UP TO PREVENT HIM FROM TAKING MY IMAGE. I DIDN&#8217;T ASSAULT HIM BUT MERELY PUTTING MY HAND UP TO COVER HIS LENS. MY SECURITY YELLED, &#8220;GET THE CAMERA OFF HIM.&#8221; I GUESS IN ALL THE COMMOTION THE CAMERA SCRAPED HIS NOSE.</p>
<p>THREE HOURS LATER I GET A KNOCK AT MY HOTEL DOOR. THERE WERE FIVE POLICE OFFICERS IN FRONT OF MY ROOM AND I HAD NO IDEA WHY. I HAD MY SECURITY GO SPEAK WITH THEM. THE COPS WERE VERY CORDIAL BUT TOLD ME THEY HAD TO ARREST ME BECAUSE A COMPLAINT WAS FILED. THAT WAS THE BOGUS PART. THEY PLACED ME IN HANDCUFFS AND DROVE ME TO THE STATION. THEY SPOKE ABOUT HOW THIS WAS OBVIOUSLY A PUBLICITY STUNT BY THE PHOTOGRAPHER BUT THEY STILL HAD TO GO THOUGH THE MOTIONS. WHEN I GOT BACK TO THE HOTEL THERE WERE PAPARAZZI HANGING OVER THE BRIDGE ABOVE THE HOTEL TRYING TO GET A SHOT OF ME GETTING OUT THE POLICE VAN. EVEN THOUGH I WASN&#8217;T CHARGED, THE DAMAGE WAS DONE. SURE ENOUGH THE NEXT MORNING, PLASTERED ACROSS EVERY MEDIA OUTLET&#8230; KANYE GETS ARRESTED. IT DIDN&#8217;T MATTER THAT I WASN&#8217;T CHARGED OR THE FACT THAT I HADN&#8217;T ASSAULTED ANYONE. ALL THAT MATTERED WAS THAT I WAS ARRESTED.</p>
<p>SIDEBAR, THEY QUOTED ME AS SAYING&#8230;&#8221;GET THE CAMERA OFF HIM!&#8221; LIKE I WAS TALKING IN THIRD PERSON. HE TRIED TO MAKE ME SOUND LIKE A CRAZY PERSON AND PEOPLE BELIEVED HIM. WHAT MERIT DOES THIS GUY HAVE THAT HE CAN SAY SOMETHING ABOUT ME AND PEOPLE TAKE IT AS LAW? THE FACT THAT HE COULD GET ME ARRESTED OFF A MERE COMPLAINT BUT I CAN&#8217;T ASK HIM TO STOP TAKING PICTURES OF ME IS VERY LOPSIDED.</p>
<p>WHO&#8217;S WINNING, ME OR THE MEDIA?</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;ll have a go at answering that Kanye. Its the media, you are famous, when you want to sell albums you suck up to the media in order to flog your wares.  You trade on your image and the publicity in order to make money.  We say suck it up.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.inquisitr.com/8533/kanye-west-whines-about-the-paps-on-his-blog/">Kanye West whines about the paps on his blog</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.inquisitr.com">The Inquisitr</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.inquisitr.com/8533/kanye-west-whines-about-the-paps-on-his-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
	
		<media:thumbnail url="http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/kanyewest.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/kanyewest.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">kanyewest</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

