<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Inquisitr &#187; baby photos</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.inquisitr.com/tag/baby-photos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.inquisitr.com</link>
	<description>The Better Mix</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 23:54:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Do I Hear 16? Angelina&#8217;s Baby Pics to Fetch 15 Mill. Minimum</title>
		<link>http://www.inquisitr.com/778/do-i-hear-16-angelinas-baby-pics-to-fetch-15-mill-minimum/</link>
		<comments>http://www.inquisitr.com/778/do-i-hear-16-angelinas-baby-pics-to-fetch-15-mill-minimum/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 16:45:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Duncan Riley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Celebrity News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[angelina jolie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[baby photos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inquisitr.com/?p=778</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />And the numbers are soaring: now it looks like PEOPLE and OK! are the only ones left having it out over the photos of the soon-to-be hatched Brangelina spawn. According to one source, the photos are worth so much that the magazines are willing to &#8220;print blank pages&#8221; to be able to afford them. TMZ [...]<p><a href="http://www.inquisitr.com/778/do-i-hear-16-angelinas-baby-pics-to-fetch-15-mill-minimum/">Do I Hear 16? Angelina&#8217;s Baby Pics to Fetch 15 Mill. Minimum</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.inquisitr.com">The Inquisitr</a></p>
<br /><br /><br />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/jolie-angelina-portrait-6500224.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-779" title="Angelina Jolie" src="http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/jolie-angelina-portrait-6500224-219x300.jpg" alt="" width="219" height="300" /></a></div>
<p>And the numbers are soaring: now it looks like <em>PEOPLE</em> and <em>OK!</em> are the only ones left having it out over the photos of the soon-to-be hatched Brangelina spawn. According to one source, the photos are worth so much that the magazines are willing to &#8220;print blank pages&#8221; to be able to afford them. <a href="http://www.tmz.com/2008/06/02/brangy-baby-pics-will-fetch-fortune/">TMZ reports</a>:</p>
<p><em>Brad&#8217;s peeps didn&#8217;t return our calls. A PEOPLE rep says, &#8216;We&#8217;d love to see the photos in PEOPLE. We wish the family well.&#8217; OK!&#8217;s rep refused to address a dollar figure, but admits they&#8217;d be &#8220;foolish&#8221; not to make a play for the photos.</em></p>
<p>That&#8217;s not very good news for anyone who doesn&#8217;t care about the baby pics. Will we be forced to read crap quality magazines for the rest of the year after their budgets get decimated?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.inquisitr.com/778/do-i-hear-16-angelinas-baby-pics-to-fetch-15-mill-minimum/">Do I Hear 16? Angelina&#8217;s Baby Pics to Fetch 15 Mill. Minimum</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.inquisitr.com">The Inquisitr</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.inquisitr.com/778/do-i-hear-16-angelinas-baby-pics-to-fetch-15-mill-minimum/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:thumbnail url="http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/jolie-angelina-portrait-6500224.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/jolie-angelina-portrait-6500224.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Angelina Jolie</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

