Category: Celebrity News Author : Meieli Sawyer Posted: October 6, 2008
Tags : , ,
Subscribe: Entertainment RSS Feed, Email, Twitter

Astrology Geniuses Hint That Rachel Zoe is a Decade Older


    StumbleUpon Digg Reddit Mixx del.icio.us MySpace Fark Facebook TwitThis Propeller Wikio Yahoo! Buzz

I love astrology, especially when it can potentially out a celeb who might have been lying about her age. By up to a decade. Experts have looked at celebrity stylist Rachel Zoe’s claim to be a triple-Virgo (born in Virgo, rising sign in Virgo, moon in Virgo) and proclaimed it to be way off:

“[It] isn’t possible if Zoe is 37 and was born on Sept. 1, 1971 [...] In fact, says our pro, she’d actually be five to 10 years older than that if she were indeed a Triple-V. So either Zoe’s fibbing, or she’s just starry-eyed when it comes to her sign.”

I vote that Rachel’s not starry-eyed at all, especially after looking at pics like these. At least we don’t have to blame her tanning bed for all the damage! We’d all be a lot nicer about her raisin face if we knew it was 10 years older, wouldn’t we?

Astrology masters, I salute you. This makes so much sense.



You might also like

  • leslieevan
    Her partner looks to be in his early thirty’s. Have no idea his real age but I’m of the opinion that adds to the pressure to lie about her age.

    Which everybody appears to agree she obviously is. Celebrity Astrology
blog comments powered by Disqus