<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:series="http://organizeseries.com/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Inquisitr</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.inquisitr.com/343198/bad-news-kids-sat-scores-lowest-in-40-years/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.inquisitr.com</link>
	<description>The Better Mix</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 05:54:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Bad News, Kids: SAT Scores Lowest In 40 Years</title>
		<link>http://www.inquisitr.com/343198/bad-news-kids-sat-scores-lowest-in-40-years/</link>
		<comments>http://www.inquisitr.com/343198/bad-news-kids-sat-scores-lowest-in-40-years/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 19:58:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dusten Carlson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 graduates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 seniors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SAT scores]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SAT scores lowest in 40 years]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inquisitr.com/?p=343198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.inquisitr.com/343198/bad-news-kids-sat-scores-lowest-in-40-years/" title="Bad News, Kids: SAT Scores Lowest In 40 Years"><img width="475" height="275" src="http://cdn.inquisitr.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/large2-e1348603030220.jpg" data-attID="343226" class="attachment-single-leader wp-post-image" alt="About those SAT scores..." /></a></p><br />Kids today, right? They&#8217;re apparently having a bit of trouble reading these days, as scores in that area are the lowest they&#8217;ve been in 40 years. Graduating seniors of 2012 have clocked in with an average SAT reading score of 496, making them the worst students in reading since 1972, according to a number study...  <a class="excerpt-read-more" href="http://www.inquisitr.com/343198/bad-news-kids-sat-scores-lowest-in-40-years/" title="ReadBad News, Kids: SAT Scores Lowest In 40 Years">Read more &#187;</a><p><a href="http://www.inquisitr.com/343198/bad-news-kids-sat-scores-lowest-in-40-years/">Bad News, Kids: SAT Scores Lowest In 40 Years</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.inquisitr.com">The Inquisitr</a></p>
<br /><br /><br />]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.inquisitr.com/343198/bad-news-kids-sat-scores-lowest-in-40-years/" title="Bad News, Kids: SAT Scores Lowest In 40 Years"><img width="475" height="275" src="http://cdn.inquisitr.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/large2-e1348603030220.jpg" data-attID="343226" class="attachment-single-leader wp-post-image" alt="About those SAT scores..." /></a></p><p>Kids today, right? They&#8217;re apparently having a bit of trouble reading these days, as scores in that area are the lowest they&#8217;ve been in 40 years.</p>
<p>Graduating seniors of 2012 have clocked in with an average SAT reading score of 496, making them the worst students in reading since 1972, according to a number study from the <a title=" SAT reading scores hit a four-decade low" href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/sat-reading-scores-hit-a-four-decade-low/2012/09/24/7ec9cb1e-0643-11e2-afff-d6c7f20a83bf_story.html?Post+generic=%3Ftid%3Dsm_twitter_washingtonpost">College Board</a>, the organization that administers the test. Additionally troubling, seniors&#8217; scores in &#8220;writing&#8221; have also dropped to to 488, a decrease of nine points since 2006. So, should we be worried about the class of 2012 as they leave high school and make moves to become responsible, productive members of society?</p>
<p><a title="In Defense of the SAT" href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/blogs/nurture-shock/2009/09/18/in-defense-of-the-sat.html"><em>The Daily Beast</em></a>&#8216;s Po Bronson in 2009:</p>
<p>&#8220;It’s commonly said that the SAT, taken in a senior year of high school, has only about a 40% correlation with a student’s freshman year college GPA.&#8221; But there&#8217;s an assumption there, pointed out by Alexander Abad-Santos of <a title="SAT Reading Scores Are the Lowest They've Been in 40 Years" href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/national/2012/09/sat-reading-scores-are-lowest-theyve-been-40-years/57208/"><em>The Atlantic Wire</em></a>. &#8220;The line of thinking implied by that statement is that numbers are just numbers, to some extent, and not predictors of future successes, necessarily. They <em>are</em> general predictors of who will get into which colleges,&#8221; he writes. Back to Bronson, &#8220;I’ve always had a skeptical feeling about the 40% correlation statistic, and so I’ve never relied on it or used it in print.&#8221;</p>
<p>So, in short: Yeah, we should be worried.</p>
<p>There are a few factors to be taken into consideration. <a title="These kids today – SAT scores are the lowest in 40 years" href="http://now.msn.com/sat-reading-scores-are-at-496-their-lowest-since-1972"><em>MSN</em></a> notes that an unprecedented number of students took the test this year. Almost half were minorities and roughly a quarter are not native English speakers.</p>
<p>Though I don&#8217;t know if that&#8217;s the good news part. You decide! Sound off, readers!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.inquisitr.com/343198/bad-news-kids-sat-scores-lowest-in-40-years/">Bad News, Kids: SAT Scores Lowest In 40 Years</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.inquisitr.com">The Inquisitr</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.inquisitr.com/343198/bad-news-kids-sat-scores-lowest-in-40-years/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
