Apple Seeks US Samsung Sales Ban, More Money In Damages
Apple is hoping to continue its advantage over Samsung Electronics by seeking a court order on a wider US ban on Samsung’s products, as well as an additional $707 million in damages.
Apple won a massive victory over Samsung last month, and it seems that the tech giant has gone back to the same San Jose, California court that ruled in their favor last month for the additional request, reports CNet.
The court ruled that Samsung’s products had copied several key elements of the iPhone. Samsung, in turn, it seeking a new trial, saying that there were a number of instructional errors and decisions regarding evidence in the trial that should require additional examination.
Apple won the case after the San Jose jury ruled Samsung infringed on a number of the Cupertino, California company’s key patents, awarding Apple $1.05 billion in damages.
After the initial victory, the iPhone maker sought to ban the products mentioned at the trial. Now, however, they wish to extend that ban to any Samsung products that could potentially infringe on its design patents, which could extend the ban to Samsung’s new Galaxy S III.
Reuters notes that Samsung, in asking the US court for a new trial, stated that:
“The Court’s constraints on trial time, witnesses and exhibits were unprecedented for a patent case of this complexity and magnitude, and prevented Samsung from presenting a full and fair case in response to Apple’s many claims. Samsung therefore respectfully requests that the Court grant a new trial enabling adequate time and even-handed treatment of the parties.”
A separate statement by the Korean tech company expressed their displeasure that patent rulings cover issues like the shape of the product, as well as technological points. Samsung added that, “It is unfortunate that patent law can be manipulated to give one company a monopoly over rectangles with rounded corners, or technology that is being improved every day by Samsung and other companies.”
Apple, along with asking for the extended ban on Samsung products in the US, added that it wants the court to award it damages that reflect “a rational and fair effort to address Samsung’s willful misconduct that has and will impose lasting harm on Apple.” Samsung was labeled the world’s top smartphone maker in the second quarter of 2012 after they shipped 50 million phones (almost twice that of Apple’s 26 million iPhone shipments).





![Pauly D Shows Off His New Hair, Twitter Weighs In [Photo]](http://cdn.inquisitr.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Pauly-D-New-Hair-100x100.jpg)


![Aniston Plays French Maid With ‘Ellen’ [Video]](http://cdn.inquisitr.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/jennifer-aniston-french-maid-outfit-100x100.png)
![Zach Sobiech, ‘Clouds’ Songwriter Who Touched Millions, Has Died At 18 [Video]](http://cdn.inquisitr.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/zach-sobiech-dying-teen-clouds-singer-songwriter-viral-video-dies-at-age-18-100x100.jpg)







![Wolf Blitzer Asks Atheist If She ‘Thanked God’ After Surviving Tornado In Oklahoma [Video]](http://cdn.inquisitr.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Oklahoma-Tornado-Victims-Reunited-With-Pets-And-Photos-100x100.jpg)


Sep 23, 2012
This is the only way Apple can compete in the smartphone market. Just look at the iPhone 5. It is clear they cannot innovate in this market anymore, so they are trying to wipe out the innovators over rectangles, icons and touch gestures… And the American court in the back yard of Apple was stupid enough to believe that prior art wasn't prior art, so they awarded Apple money that they will never see. This publicity is not helping Apple at all in the public's eye. Samsung's stock took a temporary hit and has since quickly recovered, and while the iPhone 5 has helped Apple, there are many people who were at one time refusing to buy anything But Apple, now who refuse to buy anything Apple instead, because of their tyrannous activity in the courts. Apple's greed shows so very well, and people who are buying iPhones are being looked down on because they support such a company. The verdict in the trial in the US will be overturned, and these "patents" eventually invalidated.