inquisitrlogo

 
Maxim’s Hot 100 Slightly Disappoints

Posted: May 14, 2008

I’m aware that my opinion, as a lady, doesn’t count for much when it comes to something like Maxim’s Hot 100 list. But I do know a few things about it: I should be able to muster up some jealousy about all the “Top 20″ girls if necessary, and there should be a lot of supermodels populating the upper echelon. Marisa Miller of Victoria’s Secret (pictured) got the #1 spot, with Scarlett Johansson, Jessica Biel, Eva Longoria, and Sarah Michelle Gellar following close behind.

But scanning their recently-published list, I had to wonder. Where’s Gisele Bundchen? She’s always in the public eye, works tirelessly, and is filthy, filthy rich. Did someone have a grudge or is she really “not that hot”?

The other thing I spent a lot more time pondering is how the f*ck could Britney Spears be ranked at number 19? Seriously. She beat out Heidi Klum, Jessica Alba, Zoe Saldana, and Mena Suvari, just to name a few. I don’t have enough time or space to tell you what’s wrong with this, but I know that you’ll be coming up with plenty of reasons, too.

Category: Celebrity News
Tags : ,
Posted: May 14, 2008
Duncan Riley

By Duncan Riley









Comments


3 Archived Responses to “ Maxim’s Hot 100 Slightly Disappoints ”

  1. The list is compiled more on the basis of women men would like to pork (LOL can’t believed I used that word) than actual beauty. So your question should be why would men want to boink (LOL) Britney Spears at rank 19 and it comes down to the fact that she looks boinkable. Even a wannabe photog/pappi took a slap and possibly recorded it. She might as well take a train like Vanessa Del Rio. Nothing was boinked or porked in the posting of this comment.

  2. So I take it you’ll be watching the sex tape, if there is one? “Boink” LOL.

  3. What the hell is so special about being leered at by a bunch of pervs anyway.? I don’t even pretend to understand the sick psyche of drooling men.