Category: News Author : Duncan Riley Posted: July 15, 2009
Tags : michael jacksons legs, michael jacksons legs photo
The photo below shows Michael Jackson’s legs covered in sores and needle marks, both of which doctors say were caused by IV needles and powerful drugs.
The 2002 photos of Jackson’s legs show blotchy skin pigmentation, a sign of the skin condition Vitiligo which Jackson claims to have suffered from. But what’s more alarming are a number of large patches where the skin appears to have been burned by a liquid chemical, and the area is surrounded by needle marks consistent with IV injection sites.
In an exclusive interview with
“On the photographs of Michael Jackson, it looks like there was necrosis on his lower leg where there might have been fluid that went into his lower leg,” Dr. Debra Jaliman, a leading dermatologist and spokeswoman for the American Academy of Dermatology, told ABC News.
“It looks like there are multiple puncture points from IV placement. If, in fact, he had an IV here, and the IV fluid, which may have been acidic fluid, went into his skin, it might may have, in fact, destroyed the skin,” she said. “That’s all dead skin that would then make an ulceration underneath that skin.”
“If you look at his lower leg you can see puncture points here, so it looks like there was a needle entry here, possibly a needle entry here on his leg,” she told ABC News.
“In 22 years of training, I’ve never seen an IV placed in the legs. You would put, you know, IVs in hands, arms, but oftentimes in my training when I have dealt with people who didn’t have veins anymore in their hands or arms, you look for veins that you can use and sometimes you have to look in other areas of the body,” Jaliman said.
[Source & Photos:
Jul 16, 2009
How in heaven's name do you expect us to believe these are actually Michael Jackson's legs?!! Inquirer it was tabloid rubbish like you that contributed to the destruction of this beautiful individual. Do us a favour and jump off a cliff.
Jul 16, 2009
Correction – the Inquisitr. Same junk.
Jul 16, 2009
why wont you guys just leave michael alone , the man is dead , the paparazzi and the news bothered him when he was alive and now he's dead they bother him even more , and i dont see any needle marks , all i see is a nasty looking thing on his left leg, which i heard he got bit buy some kind of spider. , and like the exsperts said , who can put an iv in there leg , it is normally put into the hand or the fold of the arm if im not mistaking , but not in the leg , for all we know those little marks could have came from anything , you guys make a big deal out of something that can be so small
Jul 16, 2009
I remember all my life seeing Michael all over the news about stupid things he did not do!
Yeah, do us a favour and jump off a cliff. You bastard!
You are a disgrace to mankind!
Jul 16, 2009
see more exclusive pictures on http://www.romania-destinatie-turistica.ro
Jul 16, 2009
i think all the people shut leave him alone already went he was alive people didnt stop measing with him he was a good person and nowbody can judge him only god so leave him alone he is just a human that give everything he had to everybody he could help let him rest he dont own anything to nowbody just to god leave him alone
Jul 17, 2009
why do and did bother michael jackson he was just an ordinary human being although he could sing and dance. all dose media and papparazi can just f off caus they dont need to be in his lif eand making up storys about him that wasent true and ijust want to say how do u feel. does legs evenif it is his who cares ther are his legs and you dont have to put them on the internet like that. now he gone in god hands u r still bothering him i hope he punished or curse them for what they said and done. and yes i did say that. and i will keep saying it.
Jul 20, 2009
If it really is his legs, I feel pain in my heart, my mind, and my whole body. Why God gives him such talent and taking away his health!!!!
I believe this should be stopped. Seems like they pull off his clothes and make him naked. This really disrespectful and I believe he never wanted people seeing this either. Since he is already dead, why don't you, media/news, stop all these stuff regardless it is true/untrue. Thank you
Jul 23, 2009
actually it is MJ
http://www.hollywoodbackwash.com/michael-jackso…