Category: Media Industry, Technology Author : Duncan Riley Posted: September 1, 2008
Tags : , , , , , , ,

By 2015, every new television will be internet enabled

  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Mixx
  • del.icio.us
  • Fark
  • Facebook
  • TwitThis
  • Kwoff
  • Propeller

From the sublime to the ridiculous, years of promise in bringing the internet to the television screen is finally starting to deliver. We’ve covered Sony and Samsung entering the race to deliver internet to the lounge room, now add Panasonic and Phillips to the list.

Panasonic’s VieraCast will incorporate content from EuroSport, Bloomberg, Google’s Picassa and YouTube, with more in the pipeline with the first sets to go on sale in the northern spring 2009. Phillips’ Net TV service will also be built into sets going on sale in 2009.

In terms of marketshare, the only company missing from the list is the US number three player LG. Although they have yet to demonstrate an internet enabled television, LG is the company that brought the world the internet refrigerator, and currently supports internet access in their Blu-ray players, allowing users to stream or download content from Netflix. It’s not a matter of if LG will join the party, it’s only a question of when.

2009 will be the year of internet television. All major players will offer internet connectivity in some form or another across parts of their product range.

But availability doesn’t deliver ubiquity.

Television sales are interesting in the context of the US downturn, actually rising as the economy slowed. Two factors today are driving sales: the affordability and desirability of large screen televisions, and the impeding switch to digital television. Both apply nearly equally across Western countries. We want our big screens, and word of mouth and clever marketing is driving demand for HD. Where as a television may have remained in the family for 20 years in the past, we willingly update our television sets every 5 years or so now to keep up with the Jones’.

The economics of replacement exist, if you don’t have a big screen now you may have budgeted it as a future purchase. If you have a big screen now, you may be wondering whether it’s big enough, a question I’ve already asked myself about our 18 month old 40″ Sony Bravia. I know I’m not about to go out and replace my set, but as prices continue to fall and screens get bigger, it’s conceivable that in the next 2-3 years, I’ll be upgrading again.

But what defines one set to another? Sony, Panasonic, Phillips and Samsung believe that internet access will be a selling point in driving future sales. Some will offer a more open platforms than others, and users will be given a variety of choices. If considering the same sized television, with the same screen resolution, inputs, at the same price, and one has internet access, it’s pretty obvious which one consumer will choose. The differentiation will then drive supply, as those not offering internet enabled televisions will scramble to match the competition. Features will improve, the range will expand, until ultimately we get to the point where every new television offered for sale will become internet enabled.

2015 will be 6 years after internet television hits the big time. Even if we take a television replacement cycle out to 6-8 years, enough people will be in the market to drive the adaption forward so that internet functionality won’t be a driver, it will become just another standard feature as technology such as OLED become the new focal points. Every television set will offer internet connectivity, as those that didn’t offer access have ceased selling, or been upgraded to keep up. In 2015, the idea that your new television set isn’t internet enabled will be foreign to general populous.

So long broadcast television

When I wrote about the death of broadcast television, I mentioned the rise of the internet enabled television as the driver of the nail into traditional televisions nail. What I didn’t know then was how quickly this change would come around, and even months ago I couldn’t have predicted that in 2009 internet enabled televisions would be everywhere. I’m still putting the death at 10 to 20 years, but what we are seeing now can only hasten the downfall of broadcast television. Take it as a given that by 2014 the majority of people will have an internet enabled television, and that by the end of the decade all bar a small few will have digital delivery of content in their lounge rooms. We can look no further than the content deals already being cut with this first generation of internet televisions that cable channels in particular are scrambling to offer their content on demand digitally, and smart television companies will follow, because they will realize that to reach their audience, digital content delivery will win out over broadcast television when everyone has access via their remote control.

If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to our RSS feed or follow us on Twitter. Thanks for visiting!



Viewing 2 Comments

Trackbacks

close Reblog this comment
blog comments powered by Disqus
  • September 1, 2008 at 6:10 pm Zee from WeDoCreative
    hopefully sooner
  • September 1, 2008 at 6:14 pm Duncan Riley
    could be sooner, and it will be among the big names, but all those dodgy cheap Korean and Chinese brands will need time to catch up :-)
  • September 1, 2008 at 6:20 pm Robert Scoble
    And by 2015 a lot of us will have five screens on our family room walls instead of just one.
  • September 1, 2008 at 6:21 pm Mike Sansone
    By 2015, we might not need a wall to watch the five screens
  • September 1, 2008 at 6:23 pm todd
    We might not even have screens anymore.
  • September 1, 2008 at 6:24 pm Robert Scoble
    todd: i seriously doubt that. I've seen screens that won't be available until 2010. They won't become obsolete in five years.
  • September 1, 2008 at 6:24 pm Rahsheen
    Won't we have some type of ocular implant by then? Or at least a contact lens/glasses for watching stuff
  • September 1, 2008 at 6:27 pm Duncan Riley
    Rasheen/ Todd, I'd like to think that, but it isn't happening, at least in the next decade anyway. Thinner and bigger is the general direction, although Scoble I think 5 screens is still some time away, by the sheer force of building design. Newer houses might allow it, but I haven't got a wall in my loungeroom for the extra units :-)
  • September 1, 2008 at 6:28 pm AlexScoble(Robert'sBro)
    By 2015 this news story will be irrelevant.
  • September 1, 2008 at 6:28 pm Robert Scoble
    Duncan: you're probably right in many homes. The new screens are so freaking thin they are great as picture frames.
  • September 1, 2008 at 6:29 pm todd
    You gave me 7 years to play with. Shortening it to 5 seconds isn't fair :-) I'm voting for the glasses that project images directly on your iris. Cut out the middleman and start painting directly in light.
  • September 1, 2008 at 6:31 pm Robert Scoble
    I meant years. :-)
  • September 1, 2008 at 6:31 pm peter huesken
    @todd... I´d prefer glasses/lenses that project images directly on my retina...
  • September 1, 2008 at 6:32 pm Robert Scoble
    Glasses will have their place, but we will always enjoy shared media experiences. That means something that hangs on the wall.
  • September 1, 2008 at 6:32 pm Andrew Feinberg
    Right now the FCC is considering whether or not to require all Cable Set Top Boxes to have Ethernet interfaces instead of FireWire. Think about it.
  • September 1, 2008 at 6:32 pm todd
    @peter... Whoops, you're right. Thanks. It's the retina.
  • September 1, 2008 at 6:33 pm Zee from WeDoCreative
    Alex - where the heck have you been? Getting ready for the wedding?
  • September 1, 2008 at 6:33 pm Steve Spalding
    @Duncan check out IFA Berlin, they had some incredible new television tech from Samsung and Sony.
  • September 1, 2008 at 6:35 pm Robert Scoble
    Steve: the Panasonic that Duncan wrote up was introduced at a Panasonic press conference in IFA. So that news was directly from IFA. Also, Philips had the thinnest screen I saw. 8mm thick. Unbelieveable. I have pictures of some of the thin screens here: http://www.flickr.com/photos/scobleizer/
  • September 1, 2008 at 6:36 pm Robert Scoble
    Here's a picture of the Panasonic Press Conference where the presenter was showing off its thin screen: http://www.flickr.com/photos/scobleizer/2805390333/
  • September 1, 2008 at 6:36 pm Robert Scoble
    Here's a slide that shows off Panasonic's expected sales of HDTVs: http://www.flickr.com/photos/scobleizer/2805386431/
  • September 1, 2008 at 6:37 pm John Worthington
    Don't mean to be all 'Mr Conspiracy' or 'Mr Fearmonger' but what implications will this have for security and privacy. My major concearn is what access is available to the TVs from 'untrusted' sources. Can content or ads be placed in my TV with my knowledge? Can my viewing habits be mined from third parties. I hope this is addressed and solved cause I'm all about digital connectivity through my house :)
  • September 1, 2008 at 6:37 pm Stewart Rogers
    probably sooner. bye bye cable!
  • September 1, 2008 at 6:38 pm Robert Scoble
    John: in the case of the Panasonic TV? Probably not. The system is very limited. You can't view a lot of Internet content. Just YouTube and a few select others. I seriously doubt that Panasonic would put a system in that sends much data home. Either way, I bet NBC's Olympics Website has a lot more info being sent home than this TV will.
  • September 1, 2008 at 6:38 pm peter huesken
    @Scoble... A shared media experience doesn´t always need a single shared screen. It could also be somethjing along the lines of a "Silent Disco" type experience for screens (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silent_Disco)
  • September 1, 2008 at 6:42 pm John Worthington
    @Robert, indeed. My issue is not so much with the big Brands but the slew of cheap knock-offs that are sure to follow. .. Which people like my mum and dad are likely to buy :)
  • September 1, 2008 at 6:58 pm Ian May
    I am really behind here, with my little 25 inch regular CRT TV, but then I seldom watch any TV.
  • September 1, 2008 at 7:08 pm Amir Gharaat
    How do you feel about privacy of your TV activity vs PC/browser activity? Do you consider your viewing habits on Hulu, for example, less sensitive than your viewing habits on your Comcast box (read Hulu privacy policy to notice relatively broad rights for personal and anonymous info). What if the TV policies and user options to control usage were similar to those provided by Facebook?
  • September 1, 2008 at 7:13 pm John Worthington
    Well for me, I do not have an issue. But for my parents, and a large number of people I know who exist outside the tech-bubble we like to float around in, they get nervous anytime anything touches the internet.
  • September 1, 2008 at 7:13 pm AlexScoble(Robert'sBro)
    Hey, Zee...I've was at PAX 2008 all weekend.
  • September 1, 2008 at 7:24 pm Tim Hoeck
    Why wait till then? Mine is "internet enabled" now.... and I don't have to pay the TV manufacturer twice as much to get it.
  • September 1, 2008 at 7:38 pm Ron
    I hoping that they would be. hehe tired of paying extra for a modem.
  • September 2, 2008 at 3:03 am alphaxion
    my pc *is* my tv!

Add a comment on FriendFeed