Category: Media Industry Author : Steven Hodson Posted: May 23, 2009
Tags : censorship, newspaper
Freedom of the press? Not when your boss is the police

It appears that the union representing Los Angeles police officers isn’t too happy with the editorial stance being taken by the San Diego Union-Tribune and is pressuring the paper’s owners to make changes.
The newspaper’s owners, private Beverly Hills firm Platinum Equity, it turns out relies on a $30 million investment from the pension fund of Los Angeles police officers and fire fighters to help fund its acquisitions. It is this investment that the League President Paul M. Weber believes makes them part owners in the newspaper and as such have a voice in the editorial position taken by the paper.
"Since the very public employees they continually criticize are now their owners, we strongly believe that those who currently run the editorial pages should be replaced," Weber wrote in a March 26 letter to Platinum CEO Tom Gores.
Weber, in an interview, emphasized that the League is not demanding changes in the paper’s news coverage of the issue or in its staff of reporters. "It’s just these people on the opinion side. There is not even an attempt to be even-handed. They’re one step away from saying, ‘these public employees are parasites,’ " Weber said
Source: LA Times Blogs
Bob Kittle, editor of the newspaper editorial page, says that no one from Platinum or the paper’s management has contacted him about the union’s request.
Hopefully the investment company’s hands-off policy with the newspaper will stick because to do otherwise sets a very dangerous precedent.






![[VIDEO] First Portal 2 TV spot released](http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/2011/03/portal-2-tv-ad-100x100.jpg)
May 23, 2009
In fairness to Weber, it's not the “police union” doing the pressuring, but instead a big investor of the paper that happens to be the union's fund.
If Weber was asking them not to report a story, I'd agree a problem.
But, if their editorial opinions are offensive or unfair to either them or any other investor, investors are always free to say change or we'll walk.
I'm not suggesting Weber is right, but not as much a threat to journalism as suggested in this post.
May 23, 2009
Actually John if your read the originating news story it is indeed Weber who is trying to exert the pressure via the investment firm. His argument is that because the police union has a large amount of money invested 'through' the investment firm in the paper the union should have a say in the editorial process. It is the investment company that is saying 'not a chance'