Zoo Officials Must Choose Which Species Live And Die
Zoo officials across the country are facing tough choices on which endangered species they can save and which they cannot, as funding does not allow them to save every animal, because of a skyrocketing list of endangered species.
The New York times reports that one such species is the lion-tailed macaque monkey, of which only 4,000 remain in the wild. While many zoos in America have begun to phase out the old world monkeys, the St. Louis zoo holds on, having been home to these creatures since 1957.
Unfortunately, Leslie Kaufman of The New York Times writes:
“To conserve animals effectively, however, zoo officials have concluded that they must winnow species in their care and devote more resources to a chosen few. The result is that zookeepers, usually animal lovers to the core, are increasingly being pressed into making cold calculations about which animals are the most crucial to save. Some days, the burden feels less like Noah building an ark and more like Schindler making a list.”
What does this mean for the lion-tail monkeys, like Ozzie at the St. Louis Zoo? It means that:
“American zoos are on the verge of giving up on trying to save them.”
With their numbers diminishing rapidly in India, their native home, zoos are unable to spend the time required to breed the aging zoo population. Gawker reports that:
“The more animals near extinction, the more zoos are being asked to take in. And sometimes the resources just aren’t there, especially when the species in question span mammals, fish, birds, and even insects.”
Because of this, zoos are forced to decide which species they can save and which they must let go.
The New York Times reports that Dr. Steven L. Monfort, the director of the Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, which is part of the National Zoo in Washington, stated:
“We as a society have to decide if it is going to be ethically and morally appropriate to simply display animals for entertainment purposes. In my opinion, that model is broken. There needs to be an explicit role for zoos to champion species.”
He went on to say that:
“I am comfortable with raising the standards for zoos so that eventually it will be harder and harder to be accredited unless you are doing that. If you can’t keep up, then you probably need to be dropped off the bottom.”
Dr. Monfort is suggesting that zoos should raise more money for conserving animals in the wild, and making that effort as important as erecting fancy accommodations for their current collections. He also believes, according to The Philadelphia Post-Gazette, that zoos should build facilities that are not necessarily open to the public, which are big enough to handle whole herds of animals, that way more natural reproductive behavior can occur.
Dr. Monfort adds that less emphasis should be placed on animals that, while popular attractions, are perfectly fine in the wild (including African elephants and California sea lions). Instead, he states, they should be replaced with animals that are in desperate need of rescuing.
Check out footage of the St. Louis Zoo’s lion-tailed macaques here:










![Obama Forgets Salute At Marine One, Sheepish President Quickly Returns [Video]](http://cdn.inquisitr.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Obama-Forgets-Salute-At-Marine-One-Sheepish-President-Quickly-Returns-100x100.jpg)







![‘Criminal Minds’ Finale Reveals The Replicator [Spoiler]](http://cdn.inquisitr.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Criminal-Minds-Season-Finale-100x100.png)

![Julianne Moore’s Toes Cause A Stir At Cannes [Video]](http://cdn.inquisitr.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Julianne-Moore-Toes-100x100.jpg)
May 29, 2012
So sad
Jun 2, 2012
As I note in my recent blog at http://thezooporter.blogspot.com/, if it were not for zoos and those “fancier accommodations”, millions of dollars in conservation funding would never be raised in the first place. The fact that zoos can generate the public support, both in attendance and dollars, is an indicator of what a powerful message zoos can generate. The best way to teach respect for and even awe of nature is to allow people to experience it – first hand. For most of us, who will never visit Africa to see giraffes in the wild, that experience occurs in the local zoo. It is one thing to see a giraffe on television, but it is quite another to have a giraffe wrap its long, wet tongue around a branch as you feed it at your local zoo.
But perhaps we do need to draw some distinctions and stop treating every non-human animal in the same manner. A frog, a zebra, and a chimpanzee are very different creatures with very different needs. Maybe we need to urge northern zoos to stop trying to keep elephants and urge southern zoos to stop trying to keep polar bears. And maybe we need to stop all zoos from keeping great apes and whales. If we are going to keep, breed, and preserve some species, maybe it should be done in special preserves or villages like, for example, the AZA elephant preserve in Florida. Maybe the biggest question of all is how do we keep pride, politics, and bureaucracy out of the decision-making process and do what is right for the animals?