Category: Technology Author : Duncan Riley Posted: August 13, 2008
Tags : , , ,
Subscribe: Tech Feed, Email, Twitter

A State of Fear


    StumbleUpon Digg Reddit Mixx del.icio.us MySpace Fark Facebook TwitThis Propeller Wikio Yahoo! Buzz

The San Francisco Museum of Modern Art (SFMOMA) has finally responded to the Thomas Hawk incident (our coverage) with a terse media release claiming that Hawk was photographing staff in an “inappropriate and harassing manner” and admitting no wrong. SFMOMA concludes the statement by saying that “We have heard the concerns that have been expressed, and we hope that online discussion concerning SFMOMA can now return to focus on the terrific exhibitions we currently have on view…”

It would appear that SFMOMA believes that they are beyond reproach, and that the legitimate concerns raised in the matter need not be addressed. A perhaps typical answer from an old fashioned cultural institution that believes itself to be better than the general population. The facts remain that Hawk offered to show the pictures to Museum employees, that he was not using a zoom lense but a wide angle lense, and that he was taking shots looking down into the atrium at a distance. They have now slandered Hawk, and with any luck this may end up in court, where the truth may eventually be revealed.

I don’t want to dwell on the points of the case, but the whole thing raises something far more concerning for society as a whole: that today we live in a state of fear. A fear that a person taking pictures is a pervert, a pedophile or even a terrorist.

How did we get to where we are today?

The obvious target is the media, who likes nothing more than beating up minor incidents into national or international stories. I don’t seek to belittle the serious nature of crimes, particularly against children, because one incident is one too many, however the number of perverts behind cameras as a general portion of the population is extremely small. And yet, today if you are taking pictures from the ledge of an atrium, or even of your child playing in the park, society has been conditioned to label you a pervert first without any due process or evidence. It is healthy to be wary that there are evil people in society, but have we gone so far as to have created a state of fear where photography has become a crime, at least in the eyes of bystanders? And what of the lost opportunities, the artistic expression that is lost because people feel unsafe in taking photos? Are we as a society better off in this state of fear than we were before?

We of course cannot blame the media alone, for ultimately we choose to fear, and we choose to presume the worst in varied situations, where as 20 or even 40 years ago we presumed the best first. I just hope no one reading this will ever be on the receiving end of the mob justice such fear inevitably delivers, I’ve been fortunate, but I know every time I pick up my camera that the mob can often be around the next corner.



You might also like



  • Mel
    Excellent post, you have echoed my sentiments, wrap this up in the post 9/11 war on terror and the hobby of photography becomes a crime in the average persons eyes.
  • Wasn't GI Joe comic #1 where Cobra dressed up as press carrying cameras with long lenses that were actually firearms?
  • gregory
    mountain out of a molehill, with the me-too friendfeed ingoup ganging up like junior highschool kids. hawk is a spoon, maturity is never an option for a stirrer. put the camera away and move on into the exhibit. you are not going to change the photo policies of britain or new york no matter how much your ego screams.
  • Taking a step back to see both sides of this incident your post is a refreshing perspective. Taking your point a step further this incident is a perfect example of where there is fear of photographers and photographers are fearful of their perceived intent. This state of fear has put everyone on edge. It is indeed unfortunate.
  • This is one of the best bits of writing I have read on this whole scenario. Those who detract Hawk seem to miss a few important points.

    He was acting entirely within the law, and entirely within the posted rules of the museum. His only crime? To point a camera at a crowd.

    Regardless of the he-said she-said specifics of the incident, the fact that people such as Gregory seem to think that our cries for justice are, in fact, cries of revolution is disturbing. What state are we in when one quietly enjoying one's hobby in public is subjected to the whims of those who don't care for the way one is looking at them?

    Anyway, thank you for boiling this down in a much better way than I have managed to achieve.

    I was given "the eye" by four security guards as I walked around Portland last night with my camera and tripod. Just walking by...
blog comments powered by Disqus
King.com (Midasplayer.com Ltd.)