Posted in: Celebrity News

Dog Whisperer Host Cesar Millan Divorce Finalized, Must Pay Ex-Wife $33,000 A Month

Cesar Millan Ilusion Divorce

Dog Whisperer host Cesar Millan must pay his ex-wife, Ilusión, a single payment of $400,000, another $10,000 a month for child support, and an additional $23,000 a month in spousal payment. With a whopping $33,000 a month in payments to his ex-wife for child support and spousal payment, the National Geographic Channel’s Dog Whisperer host well be missing a sizable portion of the $170,000 a month that TMZ reports he makes according to his filed divorce documents.

In regards to his recent divorce, Cesar’s website posted a statement on Friday which read:

“We are sad to announce that after 16 years of marriage we have decided to file for divorce. The decision was made after much consideration and time. We remain caring friends, and are fully committed to the co-parenting of our two boys.”

Ilusion Millan cited irreconcilable differences as she filed for divorce in a Los Angeles court on Friday. People.com reports that she is seeking primary physical custody of the children and their father Cesar will be allowed visitation rights as well as spousal support.

Cesar, who currently makes over $2 million a year, famously came to the United States as a young man from Mexico with a mere $100 in his pocket and an unusual dream of becoming a famous dog trainer. With his long-running television series Dog Whisperer on the National Geographic Channel, several best-selling books, and famous clients including Jada Pinkett Smith, Millan has quite obviously achieved his dream of becoming a reputable and successful canine trainer. His show has millions of viewers and is broadcast in more than 80 countries.

What are your thoughts on Ilusion’s divorce from Cesar Millan?

Articles And Offers From The Web

Comments

71 Responses to “Dog Whisperer Host Cesar Millan Divorce Finalized, Must Pay Ex-Wife $33,000 A Month”

  1. Scott Uebelhor

    Women want equality but in divorce the man is always completely screwed financially, you never hear of women paying spousal support. Women get married to get divorced because the laws make it like winning the lottery if some sucker marries you. Women only want equality in situations where it is to their advantage.

  2. Kate Reinke

    Scott, you're an idiot. I know at least 5 women personally who have been forced to pay spousal support because they were the higher money earner.

  3. Madelina Colón

    mr, uebelhor…women wanted and STILL r trying to get EQUAL PAY for EQUAL WORK….idiots like u always want to turn things to make us women look like gold diggers…Ilusion has been with Cesar B 4 he became famous and worked w him on the show…in case u haven't seen the first shows….

  4. Anonymous

    Fellas, if you haven't learned yet, get that prenup. She probably got the house, too. He gets to visit his kids and all his old s**t 2X a month, not counting all the stuff she sold for $1/each out of spite. When his show gets cancelled, she'll still be collecting that $400k/year until he gets bled enough for a judge to say he can't afford to pay her.

    This isn't 1950 anymore; marriage isn't forever and the laws are all set up for the woman. If you ain' t no punk…

  5. J Pedro Veiga

    Madelina Colón Funny that you called him an idiot. It reveals a lot about your intelligence, Mrs. Colón.

    Tell me: in a free market, where profit is the number one goal, does it make any sense for an employer to discriminate?

    If women are as capable as men of doing the same job, and if they work for 3/4 of what a man makes, why don't the corporations hire only women?

    Will you respond to this? Will you even acknowledge what I'm saying? Inform yourself, lady. What Scott said is very true: there is an agenda against men in the court system and every time a man brings it up politely, he is bombarded like women like yourself that spew nonsensical theories and call him an idiot.

    Inform yourself, lady: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EwogDPh-Sow

  6. Aazita Z. Afshari

    I hate to admit it but, yes….the courts seem to always rule AGAINST the man, no matter the reason.

  7. Aazita Z. Afshari

    I hate to admit it but, yes….the courts seem to always rule AGAINST the man, no matter the reason.

  8. Christy Thompson

    I feel bad for the divorce. You like to see what appears to be nice people to work out and to have the marriage and solid family we all dream of. We do not know why so we can not question.

  9. Corina Brunais

    She should be fair, yes if she has the kids moer often she gets the child support but she does not need 33,000 a month. I would not ask for that amount. I would ask for 6,000 so I can pay bills and go to school to become independant and get away from any ties to him financially.

  10. Denise D Lebron

    I think that is INSANE! I mean REALLY $33,000 a month. That's ridiculous! Why does she need that much? Just get the fair amount for child support and do what you have to so you can be an independent single mother and not have to continue to be financially tied to Ceaser. Come on the man has his success and now you want to suck him dry. What example are you setting for those kids? That's a shame. Show them you don't need a man to survive. If he was able to come to this country with $100 in his pocket why can't you start your new journey with what ever you have in yours, (i"m sure it's more than $100).

  11. Johnny Ramos

    The notion that women don't make as much as men for equal work is straight BS. The proponents of this theory purposely falsify the results. How many women for in the coal mines? How many women work on fishing boats? The hardest jobs in America, pay the most but these aren't jobs women take. But the proponents of this theory still count these jobs among others in their averages.

  12. Kim Lambert

    I have no thoughts as it is not my buisness, it is theirs, how can I comment on someone elses life, I only see him on tele, and he does a great job, x.

  13. Ben Thomas

    The $10k for the kids should go into accounts for them only – and surely she can survive on $10k a month herself. Ridic.

  14. Sabrina Marie Sollmann

    I always think "irreconcilable differences" is a crock of shit. You made vows "for better or for worse." "Irreconcilable differences," to me, says you didn't want to deal with the "for worse" part, or you WERE the "for worse" part.

  15. Shiri Mann

    I cannot believe all of u are obsessing about the money they're splitting and no one is sorry for the breaking of a family and marriage of 16 years. I hope they both find happiness and love.

  16. Katii Blood

    Why do men obsess about having to share what BOTH people in the marriage built when the marriage goes bad? I KNOW that's not how they feel if it was their 'business' partner who wanted to 'breakup' and take everything but a 'token' monthly payment and calling it "even." Yeah, like would ever happen. Not. The partner that was getting screwed would have his 'ex' in court so fast it'd make his head spin. By the way, that goes for women too! Like Denise Lebron here who admonished Ilusion! for accepting what she EARNED. Gawd.

  17. Anonymous

    That Madelina person is right about her being with Cesar before he became really successful. But she is WAY OFF on the subject of equal pay. There is no wage gap anymore. That's just a lie being force fed to women so they continue to feel oppressed. If people did REAL research, they'd know it's just a fallacy. The only problem women have is not knowing how to negotiate pay for a salaried position. I know this first hand. And when it comes to hourly pay…..name ONE place that pays women less. The honda factory here is equal. Mcdonalds is equal. Burger king is fair. Retail shops are too. It's a shame that women are still falling for this non-sense.

  18. Renee Hope

    I guess that's just her way of publicly admitting she is nothing without him…makes me embarrassed to share her gender!

  19. Renee Hope

    Sorry to say i saw this coming…love him, but can see how he might be getting too big for his britches and feeling above his little home town Mexican wife…too bad. But it was her that filed…

  20. Joan Gambino

    I see nothing wrong with this. First, she helped him build an empire. Second, she kept his house and is raising his children. He makes 2 mill a year and can easily afford this. Fourth it will be 10 less when the kids get 18. Also there is no reason for her stanard of living to drop when he can contribute. Also the marriage would be considered a long durarion and thus gets more money.

  21. Renee Hope

    But they didn't mention the settlement…that's just what he has to pay her after it is all said and done! You don't think she walked with no assets do you…she probably got half of the empire, PLUS he has to pay!

  22. Marianna Ponziani

    And Scott there was a woman just recently who was beaten and raped by her husband and was still ordered to give him spousal support! Spousal support is stupid no matter what, I understand child support but I don't think you owe each other anything in money if you are married anymore, you only owe them the care of your children and the respect of not speaking badly about one another in front of the children.

  23. West Side

    He was banging someone else, so I hope his ex wife gets the money SHE so deserves. They were married while he was making shitloads of money. He had a wondering dick, so now he's pissy because he has to pay for HIS WIFE AND KIDS? Shit, the beaner makes 2 MILLION a year for christ's sake. He sure IS NOT a role model for how to treat a woman, his wife, who happens to be the MOTHER OF HIS KIDS. He's an asshole.

  24. Iván De Miguel García

    Pues es una lástima, siempre me pareció una pareja muy compenetrada, entregada a sus hijos y a su trabajo con los perros. En cualquier caso espero que cada uno por su lado encuentren la felicidad que no han conseguido juntos.

  25. Matthew Reeves

    What a load of tosh, I know at least 100 women personally who haven't been forced to pay spousal support even though they were the higher money earner. See how stupid a statement that is!

  26. Matthew Reeves

    She was ordered to pay whilst he was ACCUSED! Accusation ESPECIALLY during a divorce DOES NOT MEAN GUILTY! What is this? Innocent until proven guilty unless you're a man accused by a women?

  27. Matthew Reeves

    What exactly did she do to contribute to HIS success? I love how this mythology has been spearheaded by women like you that everything a man does in the marriage is due to the woman's help, everything the women does is because she's so great. Here's an idea you don't like men obsessing about sharing the money that they make, well fine, why then do women obsess with not sharing the kids more …. or is 85%+ custody rate for the past 20 years just a coincident.

  28. Jess Weston

    That is truly saddening. I thought he had it all, just proves that you have to make sacrifices to continue your dreams. At least they are still civil to each other and are raising the boys together. My heart goes out to his family.

  29. Danna Wright

    Eliminate child support money being tied to visitation time, and this problem evaporates. She did all the unglamorous heavy lifting in their business, that they created together, from the beginning. She did the money, contracts, insurances, acquisitions, and other important behind the scenes things (and she raised the kids too – doing the not fun stuff with them, like discipline and homework oversight), while he was off doing the fun, glamorous stuff. It's fun working with clients and dogs. It's fun getting famous, and winning the adoration of so many (and of so many women willing to throw themselves at a married man, most likely). Without her doing the heavy lifting in the back rooms, they would not have been as successful as they are – except the world perceives it was only he who did all the work, when that is not accurate. So, he did what is easy and fun, and she did the hard, not fun stuff. She earned the money just as much as he did. The biggest problem is the utter lack of respect for women and their roles (unless the woman acts just like a man, and does not have children). It reveals a crisis is the mentality of men and some women – to value wives and the mothers of their children so little.

  30. Danna Wright

    They started the business together. She did all the unglamorous heavy lifting in their business, that they created together, from the beginning. She did the money, contracts, insurances, acquisitions, and other important behind the scenes things (and she raised the kids too – doing the not fun stuff with them, like discipline and homework oversight), while he was off doing the fun, glamorous stuff. It's fun working with clients and dogs. It's fun getting famous, and winning the adoration of so many (and of so many women willing to throw themselves at a married man, most likely). Without her doing the heavy lifting in the back rooms, they would not have been as successful as they are – except the world perceives it was only he who did all the work, when that is not accurate. So, he did what is easy and fun, and she did the hard, not fun stuff. She earned the money just as much as he did. In addition, (now) he (only – as opposed to both of them, together), earns $170,000 per month. Her $33,000 per month is only 19.4% of that, and yet, there's 3 in her home (herself and the 2 kids), but there's only 1 in his home, for which he gets $147,000 per month. This reveals just how much this world hates women and children, to begrudge her, her 19.4%, especially since she built the business just as much as he did.

  31. Danna Wright

    They started the business together. She did all the unglamorous heavy lifting in their business, that they created together, from the beginning. She did the money, contracts, insurances, acquisitions, and other important behind the scenes things (and she raised the kids too – doing the not fun stuff with them, like discipline and homework oversight), while he was off doing the fun, glamorous stuff. It's fun working with clients and dogs. It's fun getting famous, and winning the adoration of so many (and of so many women willing to throw themselves at a married man, most likely). Without her doing the heavy lifting in the back rooms, they would not have been as successful as they are – except the world perceives it was only he who did all the work, when that is not accurate. So, he did what is easy and fun, and she did the hard, not fun stuff. She earned the money just as much as he did. In addition, (now) he (only – as opposed to both of them, together), earns $170,000 per month. Her $33,000 per month is only 19.4% of that, and yet, there's 3 in her home (herself and the 2 kids), but there's only 1 in his home, for which he gets $137,000 per month. This reveals just how much this world hates women and children, to begrudge her, her 19.4%, especially since she built the business just as much as he did. She expected love and loyalty in her marriage, and I'm sure she would trade all the money, for that. He was not able to provide love and loyalty (to her, even though he did for everyone else except her), and so, the money takes the edge off. I'm sure she will go back to school and do something useful with her life, but again, she earned the $2 million per year, just as much as he did.

  32. Danna Wright

    They started the business together. She did all the unglamorous heavy lifting in their business, that they created together, from the beginning. She did the money, contracts, insurances, acquisitions, and other important behind the scenes things (and she raised the kids too – doing the not fun stuff with them, like discipline and homework oversight), while he was off doing the fun, glamorous stuff. It's fun working with clients and dogs. It's fun getting famous, and winning the adoration of so many (and of so many women willing to throw themselves at a married man, most likely). Without her doing the heavy lifting in the back rooms, they would not have been as successful as they are – except the world perceives it was only he who did all the work, when that is not accurate. So, he did what is easy and fun, and she did the hard, not fun stuff. She earned the money just as much as he did. In addition, (now) he (only – as opposed to both of them, together), earns $170,000 per month. Her $33,000 per month is only 19.4% of that, and yet, there's 3 in her home (herself and the 2 kids), but there's only 1 in his home, for which he gets $137,000 per month. This reveals just how much this world hates women and children, to begrudge her, her 19.4%, especially since she built the business just as much as he did.

  33. Matthew Reeves

    Danna you just talked about utter lack of respect for women, whilst showing utter lack of respect for men. He goes off and does all the "fun" stuff … what are you talking about? I and many people would define "fun" stuff as being the primary care taker of kids, rather than having to work within the rigours that he had to, don't try to apply your own perspective of what you consider "fun" onto this situation. That is a poor argument as it is perspective driven. Rather I argue based on productivity who brought in the money WHY such vasts sums of money were earned, THAT HAS NOTHING to do with the wife, and is quantatively provable. Also do you really think she did all the heavy lifting … yes I'm sure they had absolutely no secraterial staff, show producers, booking agents etc etc. Maybe at the very beginning she did but when it got big WHICH IS WHEN THE MONEY CAME ROLLING IN! It was not her doing all the HEAVY lifting as you put it.

    What's more don't try to imply I have prejudice against women. If you did a complete gender reversal, a female star/talent builds up a business becomes rich and famous and then her husband who only job was looking after the children and some small secretarial work I would be arguing just as hard – I hate having to say that it should be obvious . BUT WE DON'T EVER EVER see that do we! Why not, because their gender bias against MEN. Please don't try the saying that if I disagree with you, this verdict and believe their is bias against men, that I therefore have disrespect for women. That is a logical disconnect. I don't and men shouldn't have to defend ourselves against your so called "crisis" because it is complete supposition, non evidential, clap trap, but then again prats like you who work through an argument with their feelings rather than logic are the bane of intelligent debate.

  34. Danna Wright

    Yes, men have it so hard. That's why they hold 482 of the 500 CEO positions in the Fortune 500 companies. It takes nurturing a business at the beginning, for the lag time effect of success in the long run. If the roles were reversed and she was the star, then she would be paying him, the same. You are flat out wrong when you say, (in caps – yelling), "BUT WE DON'T EVER EVER see that do we!"

    We have a crisis in the lack of good, kind, and loyal men today. Men who are, do not lose their wives to divorce.

  35. Katii Blood

    Scott, how is getting less than half of a fortune created "together" with your husband translate to the husband getting screwed?

    It sounds to me like Ypu and way too many others in this thread are just stupid if you believe any partner in marriage or business should just walk away from all they EQUALLY helped to build because you, and some women here have some deep-seated hatred and/or jealously of women who WITH their husband become wealthy – together.

  36. Katii Blood

    Corina, who are you to decide what's "fair"? And what is "fair" about giving up what YOU BUILT TOGETHER with your husband? Where do you people come up with this ridiculous crap?

    Tell us, if you and a partner built a business together and your partner decided he didn't want to partner with you anymore, would you still call it "unfair" for you to expect to be compensated with half the business? No, of course you would NOT tell your partner, "Oh, OK, take it all because it would be UNFAIR of me to walk away with the profits of my labor." Not in a million years would you do that. Which, based on your comment about Mrs. Milan being unfair, you are a hypocrite.

  37. Katii Blood

    Corina, who are you to decide what's "fair"? And what is "fair" about giving up what YOU BUILT TOGETHER with your husband? Where do you people come up with this ridiculous crap?

    Tell us, if you and a partner built a business together and your partner decided he didn't want to partner with you anymore, would you still call it "unfair" for you to expect to be compensated with half the business? No, of course you would NOT tell your partner, "Oh, OK, take it all because it would be UNFAIR of me to walk away with the profits of my labor." Not in a million years would you do that. Which, based on your comment about Mrs. Milan being unfair, you are a hypocrite.

  38. Danna Wright

    http://loosegarments.com/2012/09/26/im-considering-a-gender-neutral-nickname-for-my-resume/

    Proves that men are favored, even by scientists, who supposedly have objective minds. Men make more money, at the get go, and would be working anyway.

    When I stopped working my 12 hour days at my off site office to care part time for my then 2 year old son (I had lost his full time nanny), I had to gain a stamina to care for him. Caring for him was WAY harder than working with designers and contractors, and, I was then required to work 18 hour days.

    Matthew, please do humanity a favor, and never have children, for with your mindset, you will most likely not be able to treat their mother well (which is the greatest gift a father can give his children), you will cause an eventual divorce, (which rocks a child's sense of security in that their nest is obliterated – they adapt, but it leaves them damaged, even if adults' happy talk to relieve themselves of responsibility says the kids are fine), and you will most likely pass long your woman hating attitudes to your children – something this world can do without.

  39. Matthew Reeves

    Yes women have it so hard over 99% of workplace deaths happen to men, let's not even talk about the draft, men dying in wars etc etc. Read Warren Farrell "Why Men Earn More" to discredit your CEO positions comment, can't be arsed to refute another bullshit argument. YAY I hope we do have a crisis in men who you would define as good kind and loyal, ya know why BECAUSE men don't have to conform to what you think men should be. Some women are entitlement prone, and don't accept men for who they are, thanks to many modern reasons. Anyways ill get onto your second comment later, cooking dinner for the family at the moment.

  40. Danna Wright

    Dividing her $33,000 per month by the 3 people in her household = $11,000 per person, per month, whereas, he gets $137,000 per person per month.

    So, he gets 12.45 times more money per person, than she gets, which is 622% more than she and the children get.

    And you imply she's a money grubber? Again, this shows just how much this world hates women and children.

  41. Danna Wright

    Matthew, her husband was convicted of abuse and is serving 6 years. While he is in jail, she does not have to pay him alimony,* but as soon as he gets out of jail, she's been ordered to pay him alimony. So, once again, you are wrong.

    * Due to the efforts of an abused wife in years past, who changed the CA laws that made her pay her convicted and jailed abuser husband alimony while he was in jail for beating her up so badly, she ended up in the hospital. She still had to pay her jailed abuser alimony, but she changed the laws for others who came behind her.

    CA family law and the family law courts are completely unfair to abuse targets – they almost always let the abuser off scott free – which sends a very bad message to the next generation, and which emboldens the abusers even more, because their lawyers tell them that nothing will happen to them. I hold the judiciary at fault, for being bizarrely ignorant about the dynamics of abuse, the markers and manipulation methods of abusers, and the markers of their targets' resultant behaviors. The judiciary does little to stopping abusers from running up legal fees – forcing their target to have to respond to frivolous and perjurious litigation, which drains the target's financial resources away from the children, and into the lawyers' pockets. I'm hoping the judiciary will wake up and stop this aiding and abetting of abuse.

  42. Michelle Shelton Rosier

    Yeah, like me supporting my husbands dream of being famously successful at his dream! U r an idiot who has never had a womans alove that doesn't think it is going to end badly. Too bad 4 u! Bitter..table for one!

  43. J Pedro Veiga

    Katii Blood Why should you acknowledge the facts presented when you can just accuse people of jealousy or hatred or some other pseudo-Freudian explanation?

    Why should you make sure you know what you're talking about when you can just go ahead and say it?

    Why do I know that you won't be very polite in your response to me but instead you'll just resort to condescending sarcasm?

  44. Anonymous

    Matthew Reeves well I guess Im s.o.l. cause Im one of the women who have to pay

  45. Gabriela Torres

    I think she deserves more $$$$$$$. He's making a lot of money :)

  46. Alvaro Aragon

    You do know whom that person that you reply is a woman right? Little ultra feminist aren't we? If they shared the business and if she did help him get there then yes she is legally entitled to it since she put in the hard work. However , there are many women who are just looking for easy money and try to scam themselves into it by getting pregnant and hooking themselves in and just live off child support. I believe that is something that you would not agree with. am i correct Danna?

  47. Danna Wright

    Correct. I do not agree with any woman who gets pregnant for ulterior motives. It's another form of lying. If men want to ensure this duping doesn't happen to them, then have sex only with post menopausal women. (In other words, men get a lot of benefit from having sex….and then, they don't want to pay, after they play. This type of male non-responsibility attitude is equally wrong.)

  48. Danna Wright

    And yes, I know it's a woman who is begrudging the ex wife and children a small percentage of the money. Women (other than his wife) slept with Tiger Woods. There was a female judge involved with letting Jerry Sandusky off, years ago, when they investigated him, feebly. A female judge was threatening to sanction Savannah Dietrich for tweeting about her rape, when the female judge gave her 2 rapists a slap on the wrist for ruining her life. In other words, there are all sorts of women who hate women and children, too. It's not a gender issue as much as it is a right and wrong issue.

  49. Gina Garritano

    yea… she doesn't raise the children by herself… DUH they have dual custody… So she's allowed to not have a job now, and take his money for just being married? How is that fair… That's incredibly ignorant… Maybe a lump sum, sure whatever, but a FAIR amount for child support is one thing. No child needs 5,000 a month for food, and shelter. Most of that should get donated…

  50. Bernadette Holliday

    Danna Wright I feel sorry for who ever marries you, you and Illusion are nothing more than gold diggers. You are part of the reason women are thought so poorly of.

  51. Bernadette Holliday

    Amen not all of us women are lucky enough to get someone as devoted to her as he was. She's pretty now but it won't last, she'll be sorry when she's old and she can't turn a single head anymore

  52. Kelly Levine

    Isn't funny how when men get famous they always dump there wife they had, and the next thing you see is some hot 20 year old on their arm. Look at James Cameron he had a wife from the 70's then he hit it big and got rid of her. I guess they just can't resist the new attention they get. The only good thing the old wife's get is usually no Pren-up so they can get a big chunk of money.

  53. Faith Peterson

    I am so sorry to hear of your divorce. Did you two try everything prior? Sorry your sons don't have both parents together. & a whole family unit. Again sorry….I'm divorced after 20 years & children it's sad. Best to you both

  54. Michael Chiasson

    Funny the range of thinking on this couples divorce settlement. To me, this looks like a fair settlement to both. To give her nothing would have been unfair. But to have given her half would have been even more unfair, in that she would not be working for that money and she was not equally responsible for their success. If the judge drew up this settlement, I'd say he did a good job. Once there is no child living with her, she will make 276K/yr. But that will not go on forever. If the show ends and his income drops, the judge will be asked to rule again, unless the original agreement was for a limited number of years.

  55. Amanda Anderson

    I don't care if I am really late on this reply, but I must say that you have just made yourself sound like a fool. I sir am a single mother who works her ass off for my daughter and do everything I can to make sure she has what she needs in life mentally and physically. My ex husband did not pay me child support at all. Nit only that he decided that he didn't want to be a part of her life. I raise my daughter on my own, I make my own money even if it's not a lot. I pay my own way in life. So think before you speak there buddy because not all women are money hungry like you think. You are arrogant and pompous for thinking that all we women need are men and their money in order to survive. Well guess what I just proved you wrong.

  56. Steven Hinds

    Heavy lifting? Give me a break. If you think doing the checkbook and talking on the phone is the "heavy lifting" in a successful small family business, that is based entirely upon the talents and abilities of one of the two people, you're sadly mistaken. If the wife keeps the books for a top surgeon are you telling me she has done the "heavy lifting"? Give me a break. Keeping the books and dealing with insurance takes very little talent or work. The TV producers dealt with Cesar not Illusion. I never saw Illusion wrestling with a Great Dane or breaking up a Pit Bull fight. My wife and I run a small business (animal) based primarily on my knowledge. We DO share much of the REAL "heavy lifting" AND the paperwork. We will both tell you the paperwork and record keeping is the easiest part of the business and sure as hell is not the "heavy lifting".

  57. Peter Ayala

    FYI, she filed for divorce. He did not want the divorce. He went into depression for some time because of his wife leaving him.

  58. Norma Jean B. Martinez

    To begin with it's nobody's business why a divorce came about.He became famous,married and divorced.Did any one of you live with these people? No you did not.Stay out of their business.He is a great dog trainer.That's all we have to know.I hope he finds happiness.We all deserve to be happy.

  59. Ann B Franklin

    That's a lot of dogs to train for 33,000 a month. Nobody's business but theirs. Don't like that they do not have joint custody of the children. Not my decision though.

  60. Norma Jean B. Martinez

    Ann B Franklin His younger son lives with him…..

  61. Olivia Planas Candole

    I agree with the child (children) support, not wife. Unless probably she's disabled or something. Sorry..