Posted in: News

Oklahoma Abortion Law Requiring Ultrasounds Struck Down By Judge

Sonogram Abortion Law

An Oklahoma law that requires women to undergo an ultrasound and receive a detailed description of the fetus has been struck down by an Oklahoma district judge.

The judge ruled that the abortion law was unconstitutional before it violated a doctors’ First Amendment rights by forcing them to read a speech to their patients which was written by lawmakers.

As the judge notes, the statue is nothing more than a “special law” because it attempts to treat the act of abortion differently than any other medical procedures women might face.

The Oklahoma law has been the center of controversy since 2010, originally it was vetoed by then-Governor Brad Henry but the state legislature overrode that veto. The law however was never enforced because of a lawsuit filed by the Center for Reproductive Rights. That group led by its president managed to start a nationwide campaign that backlashed against state lawmakers.

In the district judges decision he wrote:

“The court has resoundingly affirmed what should not be a matter of controversy at all—that women have both a fundamental right to make their own choices about their reproductive health, and that government has no place in their decisions,”

The judges decision comes at a time when various anti-abortion bills appear to be failing in other states includes George and Pennsylvania.

In the meantime some groups have instead turned to “personhood” bills which they claim do not take away a women’s right to choose but instead attempt to simply determine when a fetus becomes a human being. Personhood bills are being met with the same opposition as standard abortion bills.

Articles And Offers From The Web


3 Responses to “Oklahoma Abortion Law Requiring Ultrasounds Struck Down By Judge”

  1. Iman Oldgeek

    While I don't believe in abortion in place of birth control, I also am firmly against the damned government at any level trying to legislate morality. I am a grown man and I don't have a "right to life"–every day makes demands on me so I can go on living–so what makes legislators and fundamentalists think a fetus has any such right?

  2. Jamie Vang

    If the argument not to allow a woman to b fully informed of the outcome of both her choice to abort and not to abort is in question…. how is that treating this procedure any differently from another. Doctors r forced to let us know all info before making a decision. Why is the procedure of abortion one that a doctor should not b forced to give us.

  3. Lazy Cash

    my friend's mother-in-law makes $77 every hour on the internet. She has been without a job for eight months but last month her pay check was $14248 just working on the internet for a few hours. Go to this web site and read more

Around The Web