inquisitrlogo

 
Trimming Healthcare Costs Could Be as Easy as Training Docs… Less

Posted: March 21, 2012

trim healthcare cost by trimming med school

With healthcare costs still rising, even before full implementation of the vastly-unpopular Obamacare, many health professionals are still trying to figure out a good way (or several ways) to reduce the price tag of medical care. Bioethicist Zeke Emanuel (brother of Chicago’s Rahm) and healthcare policy professor Victor Fuchs think that a good place to take a scalpel is med school.

In an op-ed to the Journal of the American Medical Association, the two argue that “there is substantial waste in the education and training of US physicians. Years of training have been added without evidence that they enhance clinical skills.” But wait, how long does it take to become an MD from start to finish? About fourteen years. Emanuel and Fuchs say shorten that by 30%.

A lot of the proposed cutting affects med school. They say that the only reason med school is four years long is because a report recommended it be that long… back in 1910. Most doctors can apparently be trained faster, and a few schools are taking the lead and training doctors faster. The proposed trimming of medical training by 30% (making it 10 years instead of 14) could trim doctor’s salaries.

According to the Washington Post, the average doctor tumbles out of med school roughly $160,000 in student loan debt. The cost is usually used to justify the high salaries of doctors, which are twice as high in the US as they are in most other countries.

Do you think trimming med school will help cut costs? Or will we just end up trading costs for… well… crappier doctors?



Comments


One Archived Response to “ Trimming Healthcare Costs Could Be as Easy as Training Docs… Less ”

  1. As an oncologist, Dr. Emanuel spent 4 years in undergraduate school, 4 years in medical school, 3 years as a resident in internal medicine and 2 years as an oncology fellow. What would he cut; the first 2 years of medical school which are the basic sciences, the last 2 years which aare clinical rotations; the length of residency or the length of fellowship?
    With Dr. Fuchs being a Ph.D., what can be cut from that education path?
    Seems the authors are disengenuous in their cutting the education.
    In not having patient responsibility, Dr. Fuchs is doubly disengenuous.
    Ernest M Kraus, R.Ph.