Adolf Hitler’s Baby Brother Hons Taken Away From Parents

What the hell people have a right to name their kids anything they want why don't DYFS do their damn job better and take kids that end up dead before they get that way, Why because they never stick their nose in where they should and always where they shouldn't.

Your article states that the DYFS is prohibited from stating why the child was removed. How in the world can you ask people if they were right in removing the child? You are continually so biased and stupid in your articles and questions!

I believe teaching kids hate should be a crime. But that's just my opinion.

I don't agree with the offensive names they named their children, but that doesn't make them bad parents…unless there is total proof that they abuse their children, I think they should be returned to the parents…There are to many other children out there with decent names that are abused day and day out and are still living with their abusers and no one bothers to take them away like they should!

those people should be sterilized.

maybe we should have illegal names like they do in damn near every other country in the world so that this sort of retardation doesn't happen?

There must be more to the story as any fool would know the government has no voice in the naming of its citizens children.

You drones will never figure it out will ya. The progressive liberals keep taking you rights away as they tell you it's the other guys are the bad guys. They just take a little away at a time. It's ok it does not effect me directly. Raise taxes on smokers I do not smoke. Raise taxes on liquor I do not drink. Raise taxes on gas I do not drive a car. raise tax on people making over $50,000.00 I only make 40 doesn't effect me.

Teaching hate is wrong but it's not ground for removing the childern from the home. I was raised by a racist parent, I however am not racist. The kids may not be either.

I'm sure the reason the baby was taken was because of the previous child abuse charges. Not because of the name.

I'm not totally opposed to these children being placed in better homes, you can be certain that with names like these the parents will teach intolerance and hate, this presents a clear and present danger to the safety of these children and those around them at school. Some people are to stupid to reproduce… these guys are most def to stupid to have children… why would you make your own children targets for ridicule?

What are you talking about

you're crazy. This has nothing to do with your political mantra. Progressive liberals aren't out in force picketing for children to be taken from their Nazi parents. weirdo.

so should you.

Agreed. Still baffled as to why we stopped that program about 6 years ago where we were paying crack addicts $300 for their eggs (females obviously). Would have put a major ease on entitlement spending. The people in this article need to be locked up in a prison in Harlem

Name one personal freedom progressives have tried to make illegal lately?

his personal freedom to buy a browning .50 cal and mount it on his roof, pointed at the black neighbors across the street. lol

Obviously, to make a moral judgement like you are asking, )us to do) we need to know more about why the other children were removed from the parents custody. Even the state cannot take away a child because of a name, there must be a lot more we are not being told. I will not judge…

Adolf Campbell? Honszlynn Campbell? JoyceLynn Campbell? What's the problem, other than the kids will end up hating their parents for giving them those first names? There has to be more to the story. Especially since they wouldn't let the mother have any contact with her newborn.

People have the right to name their kids any name they want.They should get the kids back plus a large settlement.

By naming their children the way they did, this couple has proven to the world that they don't just have off-the-wall beliefs but that they are mentally unstable in some way.

So basically, DYFS claims the authority to kidnap children and refuse to be held accountable to anyone for doing it.

I don't know, I think you need more information to be able to judge. the connection between mother and child should be sacred and there is a line you have to draw between what's good for the child and the rights of the child (like being with its mother). it all depends: do we trust that our government agencies are able to objectively determine that these children are in serious danger when left with their parents, and do we agree that this process does not have to be transparent?

I feel there are reasons we do not know that have caused this-especially having taken the baby away just after giving birth to it. I really don't believe the names were the cause, but the reason all the attention was brought their way in the first place. Made all take notice of their lives-every little detail.

This article is extremely lacking in information. The following article from NY Daily News provides much more information about the original custody case. Note the children's names were not brought up in the custody case! The names probably drew more attention to the parents' issues. I still want more information before I make my ruling, I am a constitutionalist and don't like seeing our rights and freedoms violated, even if the person being violated is ignorant or racist. It does sound like there is reason to question the SAFETY of the children. http://articles.nydailynews.com/2010-08-05/news/27071868_1_appeals-court-family-court-court-rules

That's actually legal, with the right permits of course, well except pointing it at people.

NO. They should NOT have taken the children! (BUT I'M GLAD THEY DID).

Besides who in their right mind would name their kid after such a complete utter failure of a person? What a pathetic loser. And I'm half German.

What a stupid reason to take children away from their parents. I mean seriously at least we can pronounce their names. So what if they are named after people who preach intolerance what do you think you are doing. As for the parents I hope they get their kids back and I hope that they sue the pants off of that state. I think counseling would have been better and teaching the children anti hate but seriously we allow crack heads whores to have babies everyday and they get to keep custody of them and sometimes their crackhead mother sells their kids for crack or end up killing it because they cried too much… this world is backa$$wards~!

We don't even know for sure WHY they were taken, so it's hard to give you an answer.I think it's a dumb question to ask!

Don't care much for the name of a racist man, but they have the right to name their child anything they desire and that is not REASON ENOUGH to remove children from parents. Now if there are signs of abuse, that's another story.

My job consists in collecting newborns names from parents and here are some of the most recent ones given by parents: Jellybean, Computer, Mandela, Baby, Apple, Cherry, Harlem, Blood, Purple, Snake, Sky, God, (yes, GOD), Acid-Gene and HIPPO! (no lies and I am not exaggerating!)….If that is the sole reason for removing child from parents, then we are in trouble with USA for they have to open many ORPHAGAGE homes! ) there go our tax dollars wasted again for another just cause?

The only reason I would agree with taking ANY of the children is there being abuse in the home. The unusual names I agree are a concern, but that is not reason enough to remove them from the home, and definitely not baby Hons. What concerns me is the interview I saw of children from the "Baptist" church in Kansas that protests at our soldier's funerals. I would consider them to be more of a harm to their children, and their ways basically brainwashing the minors. STOP PROTESTING AT MILITARY FUNERALS. IF YOU HAVE SOMETHING TO SAY, SAY IT TO THE LIVING NOT THEIR MOURNING LOVED ONES.

The State can't remove children based on their names. There has to be some threat of abuse or abuse happening. In Maine, if the parents have lost custody of their children and the issues of abuse have not been resloved then any subsequent children will be removed at birth. The new baby will be taken because it is in jeopardy of the same abuse claims as the older children. I am not sure why they were removed in the first place but I do know that the State has to have good reason to remove children, because they have to convince a judge to sign the order. I hope all works out well for the children and I hope the parents do what they have to do to get their children back, if that is the safest place for them.

Children belong with their parents…..They have the right to name their children any names they wish…they should be taken if they are abusing them or not taking care of them but that's not this case.
GIVE THEM BACK!

Bruce, apparently the wife gave a letter to the neighbor which said her husband was teaching her child to murder people at 3-years-old and abusing her and her child. There is definitely more to the story, if you search on Inquisitr we have more articles about the incidents that have occurred with the family.

You do realize this is tabloid junk right? It's the Inquisitor… lol.

if children were taken away from their parents soley on the basis of offensive or stupid names half of hollywood wouldn't have their kids. No one knows due to privacy laws exactly why these kids were taken away. If it was for a good reason, then any kid should be taken away from them, because if they are doing something that bad with the others, they will with each subsequent one. And please, people, before you flame cps learn something about what they have to deal with. I had a neighbor who hated me because I didn't keep my grass short enough and she didn't like that my bushes on the lawn were pruned to look natural rather than like green tupperware. I was visited at least four times a year by cps on completely false complaints, but they are not allowed to refuse to come out, or charge the person doing it. By the time the kids were 16 and 13 the cps lady Jody used to call me and id have tea and cookies for her. She alone carried a case load of 80 families, not counting ridiculous bs like mine. Some of these workers are idiots and lazy like some people are in any field. But I worked for years as a home health community nurse and I got to see firsthand how the workers reccomendations have to be decided on by committees and such and take forever , the lowly worker who actually is the one hands on with the family has less say than anyone in the process. nursing isn't much different, I left community nusing for that reason. its the red tape, and endless bullshit of the system, not the lowly workers who are to blame most of the time. most of them do the best they can in an impossible situation, and they sure don't do it for the money.

Did you miss the part where ABUSE is repeatedly mentioned? If we are not privy to the files on this, we shouldn't be deciding what should happen. The author was ridiculous to ask people's opinions, since the facts are not available to the public.

Okay….i guess this DYFS is equivalent to CPS..so I do not believe that the names is the problem…cONSIDERING the children were taken away..there had to be some reason, unless, it was because the names, then I this DYFS is in for some serious problems just for taking away children from the parent based on the names's meanings…However, I feel sorry for the children having had been given names of terrible people from our history..I mean, come one 'Adolf Hitler' that is like the poster child for the criminally, and mentally insane..Sure people are going to be offended..I mean the Leader Hitler Killed millions of innocent people just cause he did not like them..the man is frying in hell right now….But in honesty…the children should be given back, unless, there was something terribly wrong, which there had to have been in order for such an organization to intervene.

Matthew Twinam The killing, killed off any good that came from that man..and it was not that much to begin with..just looking at the man, you could tell he had no true soul and was pure evil from the get go..So no, you can't look past the killing..it aint right…Jews had a right and those rights were stripped away by a racist insane pig…who is now, should i mention, burning in hell and is satan's new Biotch!.

Then, I'll tell you what: I think your kids ought to be taken from you for your ignorance and placed with someone smarter. The next time you call someone too stupid, spell "too" correctly so you don't look this stupid, yourself.

So, you would compare someone that displayed poor spelling and grammar on a message board with a family of neo-nazis? thats redonkulous! good luck living life with your head up your ass.

they have to be crazy people to name their kid a name like that after all the history behind it….

THIS IS ABSERD! DYFS SHOULD BE PUNCHED IN THE FACE AND THE PARENTS DESERVE COMPENSATION FOR THEIR PAIN!

Rebecca, were you aware that the mother of baby adolf gave the neighbor a letter pleading for help because the father was reportedly teaching the baby "how to kill people" at the age of 3 and allegedly beating his children? The name just happens to fit into a history of other problems (which I can't say surprises me).

Assuming this article is real, which it may or may not be since I don't particularly trust the source, the DYFS shouldn't have confiscated their children. People will hate and believe what they want, and they can teach their children to hate as well but only small children soak up beliefs and information like a sponge. As they grow up, their beliefs will mature in ways their parent's didn't, and if they don't, well, that's one of their unfortunate character flaws. Taking away someone's kids in order to prevent them from gaining certain beliefs is a precedent that shouldn't be set, no matter the case, and even though I disagree with the names and their parents' probable association with the Nazi party, that's their beliefs and their flawed vision of the world. They'll have to nourish their deprived morality with their own hands.

Robby, did you read our previous article about the baby's mother giving the neighbor a letter in which she said the baby's father was teaching it to kill people at the age of 3 and all of the other abuse, she basically begged (literally) for help from the neighbor. The name has just received most of the attention because, well…enough said.

James Johnson No, I haven't read that one. That changes things. In that case I agree that the children should've been taken away from the father.

Robby Kulesza Agreed. I do think the mother would like to take care of them, after all she gave the letter to the neighbor, at the same time I don't know how she would protect the children from their father if she had them alone.

James Johnson True. well, with if there was abuse involved, I would assume the mother could of protected her and her children from the father by legal means.

James Johnson oh did not know that.. but just when you read this article above it doesnt state all that information…only what it states. having known all the information prior i would change my statement. but in a normal case for taking children away for no reason told…i wouldnt change the statement. but thank you for informing me seeing as i always get the end of stories rather the beginning of them.

Rebecca Ann Holder No problem, in any case it's a sad series of events.

Hitler was just a misunderstood artist. Rejection is the most brutal of human conditions and young Adolf underwent the metamorphosis into the monster of our historical lore by his rejection from art school. See him his happiest and read all about it at http://dregstudiosart.blogspot.com/2010/02/happy-little-hitler.html.

@Patience Your grammar is incorrect.

GOOD.!!!!your jus mad because they thought about the name before you did

Everyone should seriously google these people. They named their kids this to honor the Third Reich. They say so. They may not be physically abusing their kids in the normal sense but raising a young nazi youth really is a form of abuse. Hitler wasn't exactly kind to his young army. It should be considered a matter of national security. I normally do not side with the US government stripping rights from individuals but just consider in 30 years another holocaust due to these two people starting a little army inside of America.
http://articles.nydailynews.com/2009-01-21/local/17914319_1_third-reich-nazis-family-court-judge
skip down past the google ads and they state the names are in honor of the Third Reich. So many would be quick to look at any Iraqui as a terrorist but these two get sympathy? Seriously? Was the attempted genocide of an entire race so far off in history that people can't get outraged over this. I bet the families of the survivors feel betrayed. We are supposed to learn about history so it is not repeated. I hope she is sterilized. The kids are not to blame but these two are mocking our government and banking on naiveness from the American people. I bet if someone named their child Klu Klux Klan and then said "It is simply a name. So what if we hate African Americans." People would get a little heated. Same concept, different race.

They should let the children name themselves when they become old enough to speak.

"I hope she is sterilized." Why, because she believes in something that you or someone else may find morally repugnant? I can't say I'm too find of naming a child "Adolf Hitler" or "Aryan Nation", but I do assume the parents named their children after their beliefs, something the U.S. itself preaches tolerance of (Freedom of Religion? Speech?). Making a statement like that makes you no better than her or the Nazis themselves, who felt it was their responsibility to "cleanse" the world of Jews and non-whites. On the one hand you imply how you don't understand how people can't be outraged by this, but for 1) I don't see how it affects you in the slightest and 2) I don't understand how you feel you should make comments like that knowing full well the extent of what the Jews went through in the concentration camps. It's not the parents who are mocking our government, it's people like you who feel they need to stomp on the rights of every American citizen who thinks or behaves differently from you. This isn't a government built upon your views and opinions, it's supposedly built upon the views and opinions of everyone living here, regardless of how different their views might be.

Pathetic. Regardless of whether the article is true or not, it's pathetic how people can have their children taken away because of their beliefs. Granted, there are rumors where abuse may have been involved. If that's the case, then by all means take them away. However, if the children being taken away is solely due to their names, then that is in itself an act of hate and terrorism. And people are advocating this behavior because of a parent's point of view? Equally pathetic. People need to learn to grow up and mind their business. So you don't like the Skinheads down the street. Shut up and go about your business. Maybe the Jews down the other side don't like you. Deal with it. If people would mind their own business and worry about their own kids, maybe we wouldn't have so many orphans in America. If people cared about their own kids instead of their neighbors', maybe we wouldn't have some many pedophilia cases. Grow up and learn some responsibility for your own issues and leave other peoples' issues be. Pathetic.