inquisitrlogo

 
Wade Rowland Sanders: Motives For Child Porn Were “Pure and Innocent”

Posted: December 23, 2008

wade-rowland-sandersWade Rowland Sanders, a decorated Vietnam veteran who worked closely with the Clinton administration, pleaded guilty to possessing child pornography this week. He maintains, however, that he never did it for personal or sexual reasons.

Wade Sanders’ Story

Wade Sanders is a retired Naval Reserve captain with a Silver Star, Bronze Star, and Purple Heart in his possession, media reports indicate. He was President Clinton’s deputy assistant secretary of the Navy for reserve affairs. Now a lawyer, he had been serving as a senior military adviser for California’s lieutenant governor until his arrest.

Agents took Wade Rowland Sanders into custody on November 7 following a two-and-a-half year investigation. They say — and Sanders, in court, admitted — he had hundreds of images showing minors in sexual acts. The files included a 21-minute video depicting young girls engaged with an adult man, court records obtained by the San Diego Union Tribune indicate.

Sanders’ Child Porn Explanation

So why would his motives be “pure and innocent,” as Wade Sanders is quoted as saying in the Tribune‘s report? He had worked with the Clinton administration on helping child sex abuse victims internationally, he says, and had downloaded the files to research an article related to the subject. He claims he didn’t know viewing the material for research purposes would constitute a crime.

“I have no sexual attraction to children whatsoever,” Sanders tells the paper. “There was no evil intent.”

Wade Sanders could face up to 10 years in prison, along with a possible $250,000 fine and required registration as a sex offender.

“I thought since my motives were pure and innocent, that would make a difference,” he says. “I’m technically guilty of the crime.”

FBI Timeline of Wade Rowland Sanders’ Case

The following timeline, assembled by the Tribune, shows some of the key moments in the Wade Rowland Sanders investigation:

• October 2007: Investigation into Wade Rowland Sanders begins; FBI agents report finding pornographic images of children on a computer in Sanders’ home via a filesharing network

• May 2008: Agents seize Sanders’ computer; Sanders reportedly admits to having the images but says he deleted the files immediately after their downloads

• May 2008: The FBI finds multiple videos showing child pornography on Sanders’ hard drive, according to official documents obtained by the Tribune

• November 2008: Sanders is arrested

• December 2008: Sanders pleads guilty to one felony charge of possession of images of minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct

Sanders’ sentencing is scheduled for March 30.



Comments


5 Archived Responses to “ Wade Rowland Sanders: Motives For Child Porn Were “Pure and Innocent” ”

  1. This will be buried like all the other crimes committed by the left. there pals in the media will never let a story like this gain traction. Of course if this were a Republican….anyone remember what the slimy press did in 2006 to Mark Foley, Fla Congressman running for re election? He was accused by the MOTHER of a former Congressional page of writing what SHE claimed were “creepy” and inappropriate emails to her son. Mind you the boy was NOT a minor at the time this allegedly took place and NO laws were broken. This did not stop the crap throwing left though. They hounded this guy into retirement and won that seat from the Republicans. It was non stop 24/7 coverage unli9ke anything that happens when it is a liberal who is involved.

  2. tomebaden
    Dec 25, 2008

    This is what you get for allowing people like yourself to write the laws so that “pure and innocent motives” are not recognized. Why should we believe you? 600 is alot of porn and people have been convicted on as little as 2 deleted child porn involving children in that appear to be at least 15 with no prepubescent. Do you expect us to believe someone with 600 wasnt getting off on them? Now call all of your stupid friends that wrote the fedral law that made is a crime to just click on a url that says it goes to child porn, 10 years for a click? and since the link is fake, how on earth could you even say it was an accident or that you would have called the authorities if you had seen child porn? No, in my opinion at this stage the more government people cought up in their own web the better, I hope you get the maximum you hypocrit lying pedophile! and go see my sight for more of his ilk
    http://meganslaw.angelfire.com

  3. Maybe they were pure and inoccent, childrent are often described in this way. SURE MAN that guy
    chesterfield in sandiego who killed that neighbor girl …Damm… something I forget the name, said he was doing
    research too.