inquisitrlogo

 
Casey Anthony Not Guilty Verdict: A Juror Speaks

Posted: July 6, 2011

casey anthony trial verdict not guilty

The controversial Casey Anthony verdict has not surprisingly proven polarizing on social media and among Americans in general as they discuss the case.

One half of the debate is horrified a woman who appeared to be guilty of murdering her daughter walked free. The other contends that if the prosecution could not prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt, the system did work.

An alternate juror- who ultimately did not decide Casey Anthony’s fate- has spoken out about the verdict and outlined the reasons the prosecution failed, in their eyes, to secure a conviction for Casey Anthony. The three points he referenced were:

  • The prosecution “didn’t present the evidence that would have sustained either a murder charge or a manslaughter charge.”
  • They also failed to show a motive. “We … kept waiting to see what was the motive — just because Casey was a party girl did not show why she would possibly, you know, kill Caylee.”
  • And the prosecution was also unable to say “how did Caylee actually pass away.”

The alternate juror said that while Anthony’s failure to report her daughter’s death troubled the jury, it wasn’t enough to convince them to convict. Do you have an opinion on the Casey Anthony not guilty verdict?



Comments


7 Archived Responses to “ Casey Anthony Not Guilty Verdict: A Juror Speaks ”

  1. Kevin Eslinger
    Jul 7, 2011

    Every time I see this whore pig I want to puke!

  2. Marylyn Poulain
    Jul 7, 2011

    Cunt

  3. Angellynn Lopes
    Jul 10, 2011

    how can she be found not guilty and then sued so doesn't make money off this case….ok she will make money thru books and movies to pay you.Is this a new way to get away with murder? Sue them for the cost of the invesgation.It always breaks down to the mighty dollar.SO AGAIN NO JUSTICE FOR CAYLEE ANTHONY!

  4. Anonymous
    Jul 17, 2011

    I'm not sure I follow you. Are you saying Casey Anthony is suing the state of Florida? If so, you're wrong; she can't do that just because she was found not guilty. If that isn't what you're saying, what is it?

  5. Michelle Thompson Gross
    Dec 23, 2011

    Well we know the fact she did really crazy things! Apparently material things mean a lot to her so the money she cost the average tax payor and good hearted search teams in time that they could have a child that was missing sounds good to me. Let her find out that no matter what your verdict was lying and leading people on a wild goose chase should hit her in her pocket book! We have real abductions that need search teams and she most likely denied a real missing child a chance to live and a family to grieve!

  6. Rita Castel
    Aug 3, 2012

    Did these jurors listen to Ashton's and Linda's closing? he explained from the birth of Caylee and the lies from Casey just why she had to sacrifice her child for her freedom…a life that was thrust upon her and she was not ready for that began with her fictitious "job" and "nanny' a new lifestyle that could not include Caylee….to me that is MOTIVE! How did Caylee die? Did they not see the DUCT TAPE attached to her hair by the mouth area of the skull found? are they all blind and deaf? are we talking about the same trial?
    These 12 lazy jurors did not take notes, or review the overwhelming evidence….the car, the duct tape, the lies, the shovel..the computer searches…..the location of the remains conscienceness of guilt.all pointed to Casey! let's remember that at the beginning of their deliberations there were 6 that voted guilty on manslaughter.


1 Trackback(s)

  1. Jul 6, 2011 : Casey Anthony Not Guilty Verdict Rocks the Web with Huge Traffic Surges